>>17978410 (OP)
Semites are not more East-Asian-like than Indoeuropeans, so no. There was a difference between Romans of the time of Cincinnatus and the time of Sy(/u)lla genetically, but I'm very skeptical about the whole aristocrat vs plebeian division here (not saying that everyone was exactly the same or anything). Also, a lot of the newcomers were Anatolians (IE-speaking of mostly local pre-IE ancestry) rather than Semites
>>17978410 (OP)
No, he wasn't you fucking moron. Gobineau thought the Bible was a history book and should be interpreted literally. He thought the world was created 6800 years before him, had no idea about genetics, let alone haplogroups, there was nothing scientific about his perception of the world, and you are a fucking retard for making this thread.
>>17978997
Yes, if you could read, there was only among the plebs with quote 'feebly Semitic rapports' during the times of Cincinnatus and an aristocracy of a 'mestizo majority of white and yellow' . Then during the times of Sylla we suddenly have a plebbitry consisting of Greeks, Hellenists, Semites from Asia Africa and Spain. The aristocracy consists of Italiots partly mixed with Hellenic blood.
