Anonymous
9/7/2025, 9:16:29 AM
No.17980528
[Report]
>>17980545
>>17980549
>>17980715
>>17983373
>>17985668
>>17986453
Who is more to blame for the development of liberalism?
>>17980663
>>17980667
>>17980677
LMAO it really didn't take long to rattle you history inept retards out of your cages didn't it?
All it takes is saying something bad about Germany (even if it's not Hitlers Germany)
Germany was the first country whom in 19th century passed through welfare state reforms such as pensions, largely to appease the masses of the growing Socislist party. France for example still relied on social aid.
The socislist parties in UK and France were small while the socislist party in Imperial Germany held a third of the vote. The same goes for labour movements whom were much larger in Germany than Britain and France because of Germanys exploding coal and iron industry which put a strain on workers harsh conditions and unfair wages. UK experienced this during their industrialization as well, but the government was far more successful at cracking down on organized labour movements.
Germany also spawned some of the most influential socialist intellectuals (no not just Marx). The overwhelming majority of The International were German (many of them Jewish, seethe and cope stormfags), Max Weber and Tönnies, Luxemburg, Engels, Bernstein. All of these were far more influential than early British or French socialist intellectuals.
Imperial German universities were pumping them out to the world.
Also, France was completely democratic yet the socislist parties struggled to achieve any influence. Germany on thr other hand was deeply authoritarian ruled by a junta, whom still struggled extremely hard to keep the massive socislist movements and parties in check, and had to constantly make concessions.
The 1848 revolution was far more about socialist reforms than they were in UK/FR.
The arguments that Imperial Germany had the largest socislist sentiments among its population compared to other states is overwhelming, and that these German movements and thinkers were far more influential in international socialist movements than in Britain and France.
>>17980667
>>17980677
LMAO it really didn't take long to rattle you history inept retards out of your cages didn't it?
All it takes is saying something bad about Germany (even if it's not Hitlers Germany)
Germany was the first country whom in 19th century passed through welfare state reforms such as pensions, largely to appease the masses of the growing Socislist party. France for example still relied on social aid.
The socislist parties in UK and France were small while the socislist party in Imperial Germany held a third of the vote. The same goes for labour movements whom were much larger in Germany than Britain and France because of Germanys exploding coal and iron industry which put a strain on workers harsh conditions and unfair wages. UK experienced this during their industrialization as well, but the government was far more successful at cracking down on organized labour movements.
Germany also spawned some of the most influential socialist intellectuals (no not just Marx). The overwhelming majority of The International were German (many of them Jewish, seethe and cope stormfags), Max Weber and Tönnies, Luxemburg, Engels, Bernstein. All of these were far more influential than early British or French socialist intellectuals.
Imperial German universities were pumping them out to the world.
Also, France was completely democratic yet the socislist parties struggled to achieve any influence. Germany on thr other hand was deeply authoritarian ruled by a junta, whom still struggled extremely hard to keep the massive socislist movements and parties in check, and had to constantly make concessions.
The 1848 revolution was far more about socialist reforms than they were in UK/FR.
The arguments that Imperial Germany had the largest socislist sentiments among its population compared to other states is overwhelming, and that these German movements and thinkers were far more influential in international socialist movements than in Britain and France.
