← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17981920

23 posts 8 images /his/
Anonymous No.17981920
>Various presidents have used their office to mold the nation. George Washington was known as "The Father of His Country." Andrew Jackson was seen as the champion of the small American against moneyed interests. Abraham Lincoln guided the nation through one of its severest tests. Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt molded the presidency into an instrument of social justice.

>Nixon did none of these things. His actions as president were purely in self-interest, his belief that in fact the president was an emperor above the rule of law. Clearly he had no respect for the careful system of checks and balances our founders laid down. Yet Nixon could hardly have acted alone; he was not the disease but merely a symptom of it. During the post-World War II years, the body politic in America was becoming increasingly rotted from within, the ideas of integrity in government slowly diminishing. During the worst times of corruption in the Gilded Age, honorable men such as Rutherford Hayes and Grover Cleveland rose to the Oval Office and stood above the masses of dishonest machine politicians. The idea that corruption and willful ignorance of the rule of law would come to the White House had not yet appeared.

>Postwar Americans were increasingly accepting of corruption in government, arguing that it was the norm and something to be joked about rather than be disgusted at. There was also increasing lack of respect, whether accidental or deliberate, of the Bill of Rights and basic civil liberties. After all, our nation had survived its first 150 years without an FBI, a CIA, security clearances, domestic surveillance, and presidential enemies' lists, and it had done quite well for itself.
Anonymous No.17981946
Anonymous No.17981955 >>17981986 >>17982381
>dems still seething at some random guy because he's their scapegoat for why their socialist nigger/spic homosexual revolution didn't sweep the US
Anonymous No.17981986
>>17981955
OP is LBJfag.
Anonymous No.17981988 >>17981995 >>17982006 >>17982067
reminder that Nixon was engaged in secretive negotiations with North Vietnam during the 68 election, before he was president. he belonged in prison for treason.
Anonymous No.17981995
>>17981988
shut up lbjfag
Anonymous No.17982006
>>17981988
No he wasnt
Anonymous No.17982014 >>17982103 >>17982395
Nixon allowed you to buy gold for the first time since 1933.

Nixon opened relations with China (splitting up China and the USSR) in what Bob Dole credited with a 30 year period without any major war, a feat that has not been accomplished before or since really. Pax Nixonia

Nixon created the EPA and Clean water.

Nixon desegregated the southern schools without violence or another civil war breaking out.

Nixon was the first and last president to fully fund NASA spaceflight outside orbit.

Check out Geoff Sheppard roundtables or speeches and also Monica Crowley on video sites.

Nixon finally ended the longest war in American history up until that time.

If Nixon wasn't driven from office both Iran (the middle east) and Cambodia would not have descended in bloodshed.

Nixon was called the greatest friend of a certain group of people in the Eastern Mediterranean.
Remember you have to be 18 to post here, educate yourself before mouthing off.
Anonymous No.17982067
>>17981988
deboonked
Anonymous No.17982103
>>17982014
>Nixon allowed you to buy gold for the first time since 1933.
no that was Ford
Anonymous No.17982381
>>17981955
>for why their socialist nigger/spic homosexual revolution didn't sweep the US
It did, it just had to wait a while longer, until January 20, 2009 to begin.
Anonymous No.17982395 >>17982480
>>17982014
>Nixon was the first and last president to fully fund NASA spaceflight outside orbit.
lmao what do you mean "last"? Did NASA just pull money out of their ass for all the more recent Mars Exploration, Discovery, Solar System Exploration, large strategic science missions, and New Frontiers programs?
Anonymous No.17982480 >>17982489
>>17982395
There are some that believe we still have spaceflight to the moon and beyond, I'm not talking probes or landers and you already know that.

Ford may have signed the bill but Nixon pulled the trigger.
Anonymous No.17982489 >>17982492 >>17982619
>>17982480
But how would you justify more lunar missions by 1972? By 1972 we had already conducted 8 Successful Lunar missions and 6 successful Lunar Landings. NASA could've either conducted a 7th Lunar Landing mission, or they could've instead focused on Skylab and Space Shuttle development, and at the end of the day the latter was a far easier sell to Congress because at the time it felt like little more progress could even be made with Apollo when the US didn't even have a functional Space Station yet.
Anonymous No.17982492 >>17982494
>>17982489
This thing seems like an efficient form factor. Why didn't they send more up? Not enough room for nerd shit?
Anonymous No.17982494 >>17982503
>>17982492
Part of the appeal of the ISS was that it was highly modular, and could be built piece-by-piece over time as needed. Skylab wasn't as scalable.
Anonymous No.17982503
>>17982494
oh yeah, the ISS. And the telescopes. I dunno, they should have ten of these by now and just lease them to other countries.
Anonymous No.17982619 >>17982624
>>17982489
Ever see that song video Whitey on the Moon?

Again I think we are arguing past each other, apples and oranges. I never implied NASA died after August 1974 (although there were massive layoffs a few different eras).

from January 1969- August 1974 NASA was never as fully funded as any other administration for outside orbit flights. I wouldn't refer to my drone as a "flight" but something manned. Even if you count unmanned I really don't think any other president's administration comes close to the fully funded area. How much of that was RN? Ok, but he ran with it and didn't stop it.
Anonymous No.17982624 >>17982643
>>17982619
I honestly don't think it was over seethe from blacks, I genuinely just think more moon missions were a hard sell for Congress after 1972 because we had already done it 8 times with little progress made for how much they cost when NASA instead would've been better off on developing things like Skylab. I know it's easy to romanticize the Apollo Program nowadays but taxpayers just weren't doing that back in '72.
Anonymous No.17982643 >>17982650
>>17982624
Jews wanted the money for their socialist utopias in LA and NYC but all they got were aids. Reptubs were just eager to cut anything because the economy was tanking
Anonymous No.17982650 >>17982653
>>17982643
Unironically, what do you think Apollo 18 would've accomplished? We didn't even have a functional Space station yet. And nobody would've been impressed if we went back to the moon to collect rocks again at that point. We restarted our manned moon mission with Artemis because we might be able to put a base up there now but even that's a massive "maybe". And it's still up in the air whether or not anything is going to become of Artemis (I personally still think we are going to put boots on the moon again in the 2030s one way or another)
Anonymous No.17982653 >>17982681
>>17982650
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bella_Abzug
I don't care about it really
Anonymous No.17982681
>>17982653
WASHINGTON, May 23 (AP) —A $3.073‐billion appropriation authorization bill for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration was passed toplay by the House on a 322‐to73 vote and sent to the Senate.

The legislation sets ceilings on how much money may be appropriated later for NASA or the fiscal year starting July 1.

The authorized allotments include $2.254‐billion for research and development, $112‐million for construction of facilities, and $707‐million for research and program management.

A motion by Representative Bella Abzug, Democrat of Manhattan, to eliminate all funds for the space shuttle program was defeated 95 to 20.