← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17982921

28 posts 10 images /his/
Anonymous No.17982921 >>17982930 >>17982933 >>17983964 >>17984264
Oof....

>One of the craziest things about America since the 1960s is that until today, nobody knew for sure if whites, men, and heterosexuals enjoyed equal rights under civil rights law or not. Federal appeals courts had ruled differently on the question. Thus, in five-twelfths of the country, whites, men, and heterosexuals were — until this morning — official legal Untermenschen when it came to the right to sue over discrimination.

LBJfags, your response?
Anonymous No.17982930 >>17982936 >>17982941
>>17982921 (OP)
when civil rights laws were implemented some form of affirmative action was necessary to undo intentionally created systems of disenfranchisement.
Anonymous No.17982933
>>17982921 (OP)
forgot to include the link

https://www.stevesailer.net/p/supreme-court-rules-1964-civil-rights
Anonymous No.17982936 >>17982956 >>17982990
>>17982930
oh yes, by disenfranchising another group, because two wrongs make a right, y'know?
Anonymous No.17982941 >>17982956 >>17982990
>>17982930
>intentionally created systems of disenfranchisement.

The evidence is in and it's obvious that the issue all along wasn't "disenfranchisement" but that Blacks simply cannot function in Western civilization.
Anonymous No.17982956 >>17982972 >>17982972 >>17983106
>>17982936
it was a necessary and temporary measure

>>17982941
this is just base prejudice
Anonymous No.17982972
>>17982956
necessary how? you're just one of those idiots that spouts John Stuart Mill rhetoric and calls yourself a socialist. you're transparent.

>>17982956
who cares? you talk like a fag.
Anonymous No.17982990 >>17983019 >>17983020 >>17983106
>>17982936
>disenfranchising another group
Not really? Many white people also qualified for AA and AA was far from the only equity measure used in the US back then and now. You should know this if you weren't trying to farm engagement.

>>17982941
>Blacks simply cannot function in Western civilization.
Considering they can occupy positions of power and status in it on top of being in sectors like academia and industry says otherwise.
Anonymous No.17983019 >>17983028
>>17982990
>farming engagement
I mean its working as intended here so I guess I got what I wanted
Anonymous No.17983020 >>17983028
>>17982990
He means blacks as a group. Due to their genetically predetermined low average IQs and high levels of aggression (among other traits) they are collectively dysfunctional and incapable of participating in complex civilization. They are much better suited to living in primitive tribes, which is how they evolved and lived until Europeans foolishly tried to civilize them.
Anonymous No.17983028 >>17983055 >>17984159
>>17983019
People sage.
>>17983020
>Due to their genetically predetermined
That is a peak dropout take.
>high levels of aggression (among other traits) they are collectively dysfunctional and incapable of participating in complex civilization
So vague talking points that you can't even grasp. Wh ybother
>which is how they evolved and lived until Europeans foolishly tried to civilize them.
People were literate in many parts of MENA and SSA before Euros came
Anonymous No.17983055 >>17983065 >>17983089
>>17983028
Which part of SSA were people literate in? You mean Ethiopia, where Arabs introduced language? I never said no blacks can learn to read, but most aren't good at it and they never independently developed it or developed it at all in most of west, central and southern Africa. Not sure why you're talking about MENA, those aren't black subsaharan Africans, completely different ethnic group.

>That is a peak dropout take.
No, black people have low IQ because of their genetics, longitudal twin adoption studies prove this.
Anonymous No.17983065 >>17983074
>>17983055
>Which part of SSA were people literate in?
Do research
>You mean Ethiopia, where Arabs introduced language?
They didn't. Arabic isn't even a South semitic language.
>they never independently developed it or developed it at all in most of west, central and southern Africa.
Jorge, the vast majority of the world ripped off their scripts from a third party and literacy rates made jumps those regions you listed made substantial jumps. Even outside of that what the fuck do you think Ajami is exactly?
Anonymous No.17983074 >>17983078
>>17983065
Ah, the usual cope.

>Ajami (Arabic: عجمي, ʿajamī) or Ajamiyya (عجمية, ʿajamiyyah), is a term for a variety of Arabic-derived scripts used for writing African languages such as Songhai, Mandé, Fula, Hausa and Swahili, although multiple other languages are also written using the script, including Mooré, Wolof, Kanuri, and Yoruba.

Lol, maybe you should do some research bud. Sorry that blacks can't read, not my problem tho
Anonymous No.17983078 >>17983083
>>17983074
Wow so Africans used a script to write in their own language...just like every other group adopting scripts.
Anonymous No.17983083 >>17983086
>>17983078
No, Arabs used their own script to record African languages because the Africans were illiterate lmao. Presumably they then taught this to the Africans at some point, because some Africans are capable of learning to read and write.
Anonymous No.17983086 >>17983087
>>17983083
lmao wrong again retard.
Anonymous No.17983087 >>17983096
>>17983086
I won, cope and seethe :)
Anonymous No.17983089
>>17983055
where in western and northern europe was writing independently developed?
Anonymous No.17983096 >>17984154
>>17983087
You just made yourself look super uneducated.
Anonymous No.17983106 >>17983108 >>17983109
>>17982956
>this is just base prejudice

No, it's generations of scientific study and plain old common sense.

>>17982990
>Considering they can occupy positions of power and status in it on top of being in sectors like academia and industry says otherwise.

That some Blacks (almost exclusively mixed race with Whites) can succeed doesn't change the fact that as a race, they clearly can't function within Western society.

We've seen again and again and again, right up to the other day.
Anonymous No.17983108
>>17983106
>No, it's generations of scientific study and plain old common sense.
Your "generations of scientific study" is almost exclusively proof by example fallacies and anecdotal evidence btw
Anonymous No.17983109
>>17983106
You guys are spamming this shit allover /pol/ and /int/. Christ get a life and stop trying to farm cheap attention from a woman's death.
Anonymous No.17983964
>>17982921 (OP)
>faggots troons perverts
all need to get back into the got damn closet
Anonymous No.17984154
>>17983096
>uneducated
Killing fields for you
Anonymous No.17984159
>>17983028
Who cares? Ill just keep posting
Anonymous No.17984264
>>17982921 (OP)
The Founding Fathers were pretty clear about the fact that the better sorts have more rights in their nation than the plebs.
Anonymous No.17984680
LBJ explicitly address sexual orientation, leading to decades of ambiguity. It's all his fault.