>>18051735 (OP)
They didn't. There is no and has not ever been any movement called "Hitlerism", as is the case with Marx and his "-ism", for example. It's the Commies that go around putting giant pictures of themselves on every building. As an artist, Hitler put up art, which of course is forbidden in Semitic """cultures"""". No wonder it makes them seethe so much. They are allergic to beauty.
As a Jew, Marx was also very, very familiar with the herd mentality. Their own patriarchs (rulers) call them "sheep" and for good reason. Marx himself also dehumanized his own cultists by only ever referring to them by their chattle titles of "worker", "laborer", "member of the Proletariat", etc.....Sure, Karl gets the inside job with the A/C, but the rest of you Plebs....I mean """Proletariat""" go get to make a "Great Leap Forward" in the fields for the rest of your life...
So you see, one was an artist who created enduring beauty that is only just now beginning to be appreciated by the world. Whilst the other is yet another dirty, stinky(literally), lying, stealing, cheating, etc.....etc.....ugly Jew boy.
Clearly, History has proven who was the prophet and who was poser ;)
"Man, I can't wait to join the Proletariat and get that cool little book and hip outfit to wear to da Club!" <---- Said no one ever.
Seriously, why is everything Leftists ALWAYS so damn ugly?