Is the century of humiliation starting for the English Empire?
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 6:04:06 AM
No.18066449
>>18066407 (OP)
Starting? It's been ongoing for decades.
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 7:01:22 AM
No.18066589
>>18066717
>>18066794
>>18066407 (OP)
> be britbong
> literally ended the slave trade while everyone else was still doing it
> industrialized the world
> spread parliamentary democracy and common law to every corner of the globe
> humiliation is a few decades of managed decline after winning two world wars back-to-back
> still a top 5 economy and permanent UN security council member
cope and seethe, rest of the world
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 7:08:40 AM
No.18066597
>>18066998
>>18066407 (OP)
>63 million aboriginal australians
Lmao. What a load of horse shit.
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 7:28:08 AM
No.18066622
>>18066684
>>18066407 (OP)
the uk is literally a third world country, unable to produce steel or maintain indoor plumbing anymore
the century of humiliation is well underway for them
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 8:10:10 AM
No.18066681
>>18066407 (OP)
>Is the century of humiliation starting for the English Empire?
No, only "sick man" empires suffer such a fate. The clearest indication of a sick man empire is if there is massive corrupt to the point of wide spread embezzlement of military supplies (like ammunition). In such a situation, these empires are unable to defend themselves against smaller but better trained/equipped militaries.
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 8:13:48 AM
No.18066684
>>18066814
>>18066622
>the uk is literally a third world country
GDP/PPP says otherwise
>unable to produce steel
they literally produce steel at the Scunthorpe steel works
>maintain indoor plumbing
Go to the UK you will see working toilets every, they're not Russia lol
>century of humiliation is well underway for them
I agree but not for the reason you claim
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 8:35:42 AM
No.18066717
>>18066825
>>18066589
all respect to 19th century anglos, but you gave up your empire for nothing, you now depend on the US to maintain your nuclear arsenal, london is brown and pakistanis rape white kids with impunity while you go to prison for mentioning it on social media
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 9:17:18 AM
No.18066794
>>18066589
Friendly reminder that still no Euro. Not one.
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 9:26:44 AM
No.18066814
>>18066407 (OP)
Started during WWII and its been going on every since.
>>18066684
>GDP/PPP says otherwise
GDP is a bullshit number it doesn't mean anything. And the only thing keeping that number afloat for the UK is the London banking sector, primarily helping oil sheiks, Russian oligarchs, and drug kingpins hide and launder their money. Without London, the UK has less GDP than Mississippi.
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 9:33:06 AM
No.18066825
>>18066843
>>18066717
Britain in the imperial period didn't treat average bongs any better, Charles Dickens wrote all those bleak stories about poverty and child labor at a time when Britain ruled India
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 9:47:46 AM
No.18066843
>>18066880
>>18066825
if we focussed on poor people we'd never get anywhere
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 10:04:04 AM
No.18066856
>>18066407 (OP)
>starting
It's been ongoing since we had to surrender all of our gold and bases to the USA while begging for their help against Germany in the second world war, only interrupted very briefly by the Argentines overestimating our decline (though we'd certainly be fucked had they attacked ten years later).
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 10:15:54 AM
No.18066871
>>18066407 (OP)
>63 million Aboriginal Australians
There weren't even a million aboriginals in Australia before Europeans arrived.
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 10:20:10 AM
No.18066880
>>18066892
>>18066843
so it's okay if Pakistanis rape them? They weren't hitting the kids of the elite but the same people the elite always screwed over; some things sadly haven't changed in bongland
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 10:33:28 AM
No.18066892
>>18066880
in the 19th century pakistanis were a subject people on the other side of the world, the idea of importing millions to britain would be considered utter lunacy
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 12:13:16 PM
No.18066998
>>18066597
Yup. There weren't even a million of them. Something around 60k tops.
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 2:13:42 PM
No.18067175
>>18067524
We're nearly done with it, OP.
It began immediately after WW2-we could go back further, but for the "Century" bit the 1950s makes the most sense.
>Partition of India
>Palestine War
>Egyptian Revolution
>Suez
>Aden Emergency
>Cod Wars
>Troubles
>Hong Kong handover
>Afghanistan War
>Brexit shitshow
>Overplayed pro-Israel Hand
First, Britain lost of all of its territories (and influence) overseas. Then, it lost all of its prestige at home. We have long been the "haha, cucks" nation of Europe, but we are absolutely in the thick of our humiliation and decline. Our nation is seen by our peers as a joke, by our enemies as a fallen adversary to be pitied (or manipulated), by our lessers as a means of them getting ahead. Right now, we are;
>governed by the least representative government in the history of british democracy
>seeing wide ranging, completely unregulated surveillance on a scale never seen before
>in the AFTERMATH of demographic change (it can no longer be reversed), with Britain shifting under its own weight to re-define what the country even is
>the total remaking of our foundation origins (goodbye alfred the great, goodbye the normans, goodbye the vikings, goodbye england-hello the "WW2 good guys" cosmopolitan sludge with a cockney accent
>rife with politicla instability
It should wrap up in the 2050s, assumedly with the end of the British Monarchy and the creation of the Republic of Britain. The last Windsor monarch will be a politician for one of the many "monarchist" lobbies in Europe, like with France.
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 4:49:03 PM
No.18067524
>>18067531
>>18067175
You also lost the World Cup
Anonymous
10/12/2025, 4:52:19 PM
No.18067531
>>18067524
We lose every world cup.
We won it ONCE, 60 years ago.