Thread 18072969

Is Christianity really a racist/race realist religion?

All dutch tranime posters should be brutally raped to death. Fact!!

no christianity is not racist, nor should it be because racism is immoral (racial hatred)

No, but Christian Identity is or could be since most Christian history played out in what we refer to as white countries

>>18072969 (OP)
It's literally the opposite. Christianity was born as a universalist version of judaism.

> Galatians 3:28
> Galatians 3:28
> Galatians 3:28
> Galatians 3:28
> Galatians 3:28

Everyone, regardless of race, is equally a sinful nigger who needs salvation through Christ.

> b-b-b-b-b-but MUH CURSE OF HAM
Old Testament shit, and theologians have been debating for centuries if it was even about race or just Canaanites.

ALSO first major theological fight in the early church was about taking the gospel to non-Jewish subhumans (Acts 15). The apostles literally had a council and decided race doesn't matter.

Anyone using the Bible to justify racism is either a schizo mental gymnast or hasn't actually read the thing, either way will born in Hell, raped by Satan while there and be left in a dungeon to rot for eternity, and their soul will be obliterated with the rest of the trash that's cast into the lake of fire for their stupidity, just like the rest of us who've ignored God's words, so we'll be there too.

>>18072984
/thread

>>18072989
Failure to discern the difference between the light and the dark is the sort of blindness that Jesus often cured. :)

>>18072969 (OP)
No but it should be. I literally Catholicism because it become to associated with beaners

>>18072982
>most Christian history played out in what we refer to as white countries
WE WUZ
>>18073003
>stupid wignat babbling in metaphors he can't understand because he doesn't have the balls to admit he hates niggers in plain english

>>18073006
>christianity is le bad because I hate brown people
retarded /pol/tranny

>>18073007
Lovers of the dark are enemies of the light, and far from God.

>>18073007
>WE WUZ
But its true

>>18073006
*abandoned
>>18073015
This but unironically. I want to be amongst fair haired and skinned knights and monks not among fat third world goblinos raping their kids and having identity complex

>>18073007
>in metaphors

>>18073017
>>18073027
>>18073039
>>18073040

>>18072984
This. If you want a religion that approves of racism, become a Jew. You just can't reconcile racism with Christianity.

>>18073039
>>18073040
You will never be an aryan god

>>18073058
You will always be subhuman goblino mongrel

>>18072969 (OP)
European Christians permitted Jews to castrate and sell European pagan boys and European pagan girls as slaves to Muslims and Asians in al-Andalus and Asia. Radhanite Jews of Medieval Europe castrated and sold European pagan slaves to Muslims and Asians going as far as India and China White women, children and eunuchs from the west were sold in Al-Andalus and Asia by Jews in the Middle Ages.

>These merchants speak Arabic, Persian, Roman, the Frank, Spanish, and Slav languages. They journey from West to East, from East to West, partly on land, partly by sea. They transport from the West eunuchs, female slaves, boys, brocade, castor, marten and other furs, and swords. They take ship from Firanja (France), on the Western Sea, and make for Farama (Pelusium). There they load their goods on camel-back and go by land to al-Kolzum (Suez), a distance of twenty-five farsakhs. They embark in the East Sea and sail from al-Kolzum to al-Jar and al-Jeddah, then they go to Sind, India, and China. On their return from China they carry back musk, aloes, camphor, cinnamon, and other products of the Eastern countries to al-Kolzum and bring them back to Farama, where they again embark on the Western Sea. Some make sail for Constantinople to sell their goods to the Romans; others go to the palace of the King of the Franks to place their goods. Sometimes these Jew merchants, when embarking from the land of the Franks, on the Western Sea, make for Antioch (at the head of the Orontes River); thence by land to al-Jabia (al-Hanaya on the bank of the Euphrates), where they arrive after three days’ march. There they embark on the Euphrates and reach Baghdad, whence they sail down the Tigris, to al-Obolla. From al-Obolla they sail for Oman, Sindh, Hind, and China

>>18072969 (OP)
No, it has only become so after Christianity was coopted by Europeans and Americans who have never set foot on the holy land. It's purely a reactionary response by "whites" that are extremely opposed to migration of minorities they feel threatened by. The thing is that these whites are not anti-establishment. They love the establishment and all the degeneracy in their country. It's just that Christianity provides a perfect stand in for the true criteria of their pathetic movement, which is race.
It's gotten to this point because non-Christians, typically Muslim migrants, entertain the notion that "Christianity" is "European". So instead of pointing out how much of a LARP Christianity in Europe is, Muslims would rather enter into debates about, "oh enforcing state laws and deporting undesirables is unchristian of you", or how the crusades were NotSoChristian according to this verse in the bible.
Actual Christians in the Middle East are not welcoming of foreigners but they are not racialist.

>>18072969 (OP)
Here is St. Thomas, the wisest man in history, on adopting foreigners into one's homeland, the actual issue at hand, not race:

>I answer that, Man's relations with foreigners are twofold: peaceful, and hostile: and in directing both kinds of relation the Law contained suitable precepts... Thirdly, when any foreigners wished to be admitted entirely to their fellowship and mode of worship. With regard to these a certain order was observed. For they were not at once admitted to citizenship: just as it was law with some nations that no one was deemed a citizen except after two or three generations, as the Philosopher says (Polit. iii, 1). The reason for this was that if foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers might occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people. Hence it was that the Law prescribed in respect of certain nations that had close relations with the Jews, that they should be admitted to the fellowship of the people after the third generation; whereas others (with whom their relations had been hostile, such as the Ammonites and Moabites) were never to be admitted to citizenship; while the Amalekites, who were yet more hostile to them, and had no fellowship of kindred with them, were to be held as foes in perpetuity...
https://www.newadvent.org/summa/2105.htm
Note the commonsensical focus on the common good, a concept the west positively wars against with its worship of the individual.

IT IS NOT