Thread 18076036

Why did practically every male WHG skull have wide cheekbones

>>18076036 (OP)
Bump

>>18076072
Wide relative to modern humans on goyslop. Obviously it follows racial and diet patterns.

>>18076036 (OP)
Allows for larger muscle attachments to aid in chewing meat, and other tough foods. Not to mention eating more, good quality foods overall. Being physically robust means you could also take a beating and keep going better than a MED-MENA olive muncher. It was probably more attractive to women, the same way it is today for whatever reasons. Even Asian dudes with tiny rice pp's can have the high cheekbone supermodel look.

>>18076036 (OP)
>50% of Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers from Motala carried the derived variant of EDAR-V370A

NE-Asian admixture

>>18076036 (OP)
whgs were more robust than gravettians and aurignacians too
>>18076091
no, east asians have a lot of derived edar snps, having only V370A means nothing

>>18076090
>It was probably more attractive to women
Which is counteracted by gracile women being attractive to men. It's personally my explanation by the drop in steppe ancestry across northern europe since the iron age, scots could go as high as 60%, today they rarely get to 50%

>>18076187
Cope.
There are dozens of clinics in seoul to treat the edar caused double jaw condition, some even have columns worth of shaved jaws on display.

>>18076295
>There are dozens of clinics in seoul to treat the edar caused double jaw condition,
there's no such thing as "treating edar", be quiet and stop shitting up the thread

>>18076187
The Kostenki-Sunghir people had Dinka-like gracile body proportions due to being recent immigrants from Africa. The WHG were Neanderthal-like manlets that had more time to adapt to the cold climate of the region.

>>18076036 (OP)
Now that the dust has settled, how did yamanaya came to be? was it a result of EHG men fucking (raping) CHG women and later absorbing parts of their culture?

>>18076463
>The Kostenki-Sunghir people had Dinka-like gracile body proportions

What you're talking about, the sunghir-1 had a clavicle length of 194mm.

>>18076490
>Physical remains of people of the Gravettian have revealed that they were tall and relatively slender people. The male height of the Gravettian culture ranged between 179 and 188 centimetres (5 ft 10 in and 6 ft 2 in) tall with an average of 183.5 centimetres (6 ft 0.2 in), which is exceptionally tall not only for that period of prehistory, but for all periods of history
>They were fairly slender and normally weighed between 67–73 kilograms (148–161 lb), although they would likely have had a higher ratio of lean muscle mass compared to body fat in comparison to modern humans as a result of a very physically active and demanding lifestyle

>>18076463
>The Kostenki-Sunghir people had Dinka-like gracile body proportions due to being recent immigrants from Africa.
body proportions are irrelevant, also
>The latest results of anthropological studies of bone remains from the earliest Upper Paleolithic burial discovered on Russian territory, the Markina Gora site (Kostenki 14), are described. Multivariate statistical methods and parallel studies of the buried skull structure and dentition established that their morphological characteristics undoubtedly belonged to the Caucasian complex.

also the argument is about whgs

Modern european man with massive cheekbones

Basque man (hightest whg in Iberia peninsula)

>>18076036 (OP)
>>18076188
Wide cheekbones are the result of Neanderthalization from Ice Age conditions.
Gracility isnt attractive on women necessarily it is just that gracile populations in Europe had exaggerated bundas and boobas. farm girls were mommy tier while the broad faced WHG and Steppe peoples were chestlets and bundalets but they did have wide hips.

Steppe and WHG men had the luxury of picking from a wide variety of females while we today do not, we should breed the facially superior women out of being chestlets and into being Venus figurines.

Austrian man

Cro-Magnon as fuck

>>18077254
bald = EEF genes

>>18076075
I've eat slop all my life and I have WHG cheekbones.
It's just genes.

>>18077385
But you didn't reproduce.

>>18076478
this is just about heat retention in their respective environments. Short, stocky critters retain heat, while tall, skinny critters can lose it more quickly. Long legs can help you cover ground more efficiently too.

Ultimately, the Eskimo would do better in more places in the world. The Nog is too hyper-adapted to one area and would die in the cold, wet, or doing any work that required endurance and strength over time. He's essential just a human cheetah. Good at what it does, but it only does one thing in one place.

>>18076503
Literally me(proportionally). Amazing to think this build (6' +170lbs) was "extreme" for most of history, but it makes sense when you see real arms and armor in person and realize the average "warrior" in History was only about 5'2''-5'4'' and about 130-140lbs. The size of a small """modern""" """"woman"""". Many samurai were even slightly under 5' and Alexander and Mozart were said to only be about 5'2'', as well.

The problem with these guys vs. 6' Euro is that the Euro can adapt to Africa better than the African can adapt to Euro.

Nogs, Jeets and other Brownoids are starting to develop Rickets in the UK now b/c they're all shut-in losers that don't get enough sunlight, so they can't metabolize their Vitamin D properly.

Gringos win again!

>>18076036 (OP)
Douchebag physionomy

>>18077402
there is a very high chance she did reproduce.

>>18078451
So tall Nordics are inferior?

>>18078451
>or doing any work that required endurance and strength over time
But East Africans are the best in the world at endurance?

>>18079179
>So tall Nordics are inferior?
Yes, wypipo are going extinct because they're not properly adapted to the environment.

>>18076036 (OP)
A meat-rich diet enabled a proper development.

>>18079310
WHG were midgets compared to Gravettians.