Thread 18082496

If you reject Christianity the only two consistent moral positions are Schopenhaurianism and Nietzscheanism, anything else such as utilitarianism is a compromised cope.

>>18082496 (OP)
Where does Zoroastrianism fall?

>>18083862
Op just lost.
But Christianity would move more toward most other religious morality since all them were founded by Jews based on local myths.

>>18083862
Does Zoroastrianism have a savior in the vein of Jesus?

I don't need a position, let alone a consistent one.

>>18083981
This is jus Nietzschean amoralism though.

>>18082496 (OP)
>Christians believe that a magical Jew capable of controlling storms and modifying matter, that is, basically an x-man, died, was resurrected and flew away to sit in the clouds on the right side of himself

>>18082496 (OP)
>Nietzscheanism
I favor explicitly Homeric Nietzscheanism.

>>18083964
Yes. The jews may very well have picked up their messianism from zoroastrianism.

>>18082496 (OP)
>moral positions
Is it moral to burn pagans, kill sorcerers, heretics, apostates, and heretics? Or how did churches in the Middle Ages bless wars between Christian countries? What kind of morality is that? Why were so many more sophisticated executions devised in the Middle Ages? is that also Christian morality?

People had laws before Christianity. What kind of Christian doctrine is this, that people were savages before it?

>>18083964
Can you explain why?
>>18083995
Nietzsche's philosophy is a much more reasoned position than 'muh force durr'.

>>18084042
Nice fashion statement, you want a substack and some 'aesthetic' instagram posts with that?

>>18084093
>the books you reference are mere fashion statements
the lady doth project too much

>>18084098
You got your ideology from X. And you use it to pose as a learned and bookish man.

>>18084045
Details?

>>18084125
>You got your ideology from X.
The negro rapper?

>>18084249
The everything app. I do not keep up with Nigger rap too much.

>>18084289
Sorry zoom zoom I don't know anything about apps. In my generation, X is a party drug or a negro rapper who puts flatscreens in your shitbox car - and I don't recall MTV ever teaching Nietzsche.

>>18082496 (OP)
Utilitarianism is cope but unironically believing in a slave morality invented by desert cultists isn't? Get real.

Your "two options" are a false dilemma for edge-lords. Most moral systems don't need your sky-daddy to function. Virtue ethics existed before Christ, and Buddhist ethics completely shatters your weak dichotomy without needing nihilism or cringe superman LARPing.

The only inconsistent position is pretending your arbitrary choice between basement-pisser pessimism and might-makes-right is the only "logical" path.