← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 18089662

20 posts 22 images /his/
Anonymous No.18089662 [Report] >>18089902 >>18089945 >>18089960 >>18090074
Blacks are actually really White
Outside of a handful of regions I can't help but see that black culture is actually a time capsule of 19th century poor southern whites.

>traditional foods(greens, poke sallet, cornbread, chitlins) are just normal food for the rural south at the time
>black methodist and bapist church lineage once identical to the poor white church system
>church traditions are rooted in anglo-celtic lining out and illiteracy(the white and black connection between gospel and blues is very visible)
>musical traditions are usually just informal/improvised white jig music(ragtime rooted in improvised "rag" slave dance parties with homemade instruments)
>musical culture was heavily buoyed by white minstrels imitating blacks with a higher technical skill and instrument formalization, heavily influencing them
>blues, bluegrass, and rock and roll have very clear lineage to anglo-celtic music more than anything african
>the origin of instruments such as the banjo and guitar have been blackwashed, with near eastern and greek lute diffusion through the arab world to africa with africa framed as if its the point of origin
>most traditional folklore and superstition is often anglo-celtic and native american, not african in origin(outside of the Gullah people and New Orleans)

White culture and norms have changed so much in the past two centuries that we don't recognize how much of what defines "blackness" is just antiquated white poverty.
Anonymous No.18089668 [Report]
blacks are not christian
Anonymous No.18089672 [Report]
drugs, gangs, prison. lol this post is not great!
Anonymous No.18089679 [Report]
It you hang around blacks, they're really frustratingly pro wh*te.
They are likely the single driving force keeping dogshit american brands like Dodge, Chevy, and Cadillac in business. I never seen a black in a jdm.
They have an irrational violent aversion to the Chinese.
Their calls for change are never anti establishment. They're violent but pro establishment. The US government and corporate america constantly makes excuses for them abd normal americans pay for it.
They are fully invested in the red scares. They dint know what communism is but they get extremely peeved at paying taxes. Even if they go to services they need.
I literally see them as wh*tes.
Anonymous No.18089902 [Report] >>18089913 >>18089956
>>18089662 (OP)
Anonymous No.18089913 [Report]
>>18089902
I forgot that both world was started in Africa...it's because those savage niggers are so darn violent!
Anonymous No.18089945 [Report]
>>18089662 (OP)
Yup.
But most people are too stupid to know all that.
Anonymous No.18089956 [Report]
>>18089902
Implying you understand any of that.
Anonymous No.18089960 [Report] >>18089967
>>18089662 (OP)
Get out of /his/, Thomas Sowell.
Anonymous No.18089967 [Report] >>18090026
>>18089960
In this regard, Sowell is correct.
Anonymous No.18090026 [Report] >>18090032 >>18090039
>>18089967
The majority of negroes lived in the Deep South where the whites were Southwest English/West Midlands/Welsh, whose largest "Celtic" presence (Britons have no genetic proximity/descend from Hallstatt, the Celtic Urheimat) is in Cornwall and Wales. Appalachians are more Scotch-Irish/Ulster Scots than them.

>The predominant culture of the original Southern states was English, particularly from South East England, South West England and the West Midlands. In the 17th century, most voluntary immigrants were of English origin and settled chiefly along the eastern coast, but had pushed as far inland as the Appalachian Mountains by the 18th century. The majority of early English settlers were indentured servants, who gained freedom after working off their passage. The wealthier men, typically members of the English landed gentry, who paid their way received land grants known as headrights to encourage settlement

>In the time of their arrival, the predominant cultural influence on the Southern states was that of the English colonists who established the original English colonies in the region. In the 17th century, most were of South West England and South East England origins, from regions such as Kent, Sussex and the West Country who settled mostly on the coastal regions of the South but pushed as far inland as the Appalachian mountains by the 18th century. In the 18th century, large groups of Scots lowlanders, Northern English and Ulster-Scots (later called the Scots-Irish) (who's ancestors were Protestants from the Scottish lowlands and Northern England) settled in Appalachia and the Piedmont. Following them were larger numbers of English indentured servants from across the English Midlands and Southern England; they would be the largest group to settle in the Southern Colonies during the colonial period. They were often called "crackers", a derogatory epithet applied to rural, non-elite whites of south Georgia and north Florida.
Anonymous No.18090032 [Report] >>18090038
>>18090026
>Before the American Revolution, the term was applied by the English, as a derogatory epithet for the non-elite settlers of the southern backcountry. This usage can be found in a passage from a letter to the Earl of Dartmouth, "I should explain... what is meant by Crackers; a name they have got from being great boasters; they are a lawless set of rascals on the frontiers of Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia, who often change their places of abode."

>Most European Southerners today are of partial or majority English and Scots-Irish ancestry. In previous censuses, over a third of Southern responders identified as being of English or partly English ancestry with 19,618,370 self-identifying as "English" on the 1980 census, followed by 12,709,872 identifying as Irish, 11,054,127 as Afro-American, and 10,742,903 as German. It should also be noted that those who did identify themselves of German ancestry were almost exclusively found in the northern border areas of the region which are adjacent to the American Mid-West. Those from the Tidewater area of Virginia and the Tidewater region of North Carolina identified themselves almost exclusively as of English origins, while those from the Piedmont areas were a mixture of English, Scotch-Irish, Scottish and Irish origins. South Georgia has a large Irish presence, the ancestors of whom were largely at one time Roman Catholic; however, many were converted to various Protestant sects due to the lack of a missionary presence of the Catholic Church in the 18th and 19th centuries. The predominance of Irish surnames in South Georgia has been noted by American historians for some time. Meanwhile, a community of Scottish highlanders settled around what is now Fayetteville in North Carolina. Gaelic was spoken in this region into the nineteenth century
Anonymous No.18090038 [Report] >>18090041
>>18090032
>The Celtic nations or Celtic countries are a cultural area and collection of geographical regions in Northwestern Europe where the Celtic languages and cultural traits have survived. The term nation is used in its original sense to mean a people who share a common identity and culture and are identified with a traditional territory

>The six regions widely considered Celtic countries in modern times are Brittany (Breizh), Cornwall (Kernow), Ireland (Éire), the Isle of Man (Mannin, or Ellan Vannin), Scotland (Alba), and Wales (Cymru). In each of these six regions a Celtic language is spoken to some extent: Brittonic or Brythonic languages are spoken in Brittany (Breton), Cornwall (Cornish), and Wales (Welsh), whilst Goidelic or Gaelic languages are spoken in Scotland (Scottish Gaelic), Ireland (Irish), and the Isle of Man (Manx)

>Before the expansion of ancient Rome and the spread of Germanic and Slavic tribes, much of Europe was dominated by Celtic-speaking cultures, leaving behind a legacy of Celtic cultural traits. Certain regions with evidence of Celtic influence in northwestern Iberia, such as Galicia, Asturias, northern Portugal, León, and Cantabria (historically known as Gallaecia and Astures), are not typically considered Celtic nations. Unlike the Insular Celtic languages, there's no record of Celtic languages surviving into the modern era in these regions. Similar evidence of a pattern of Celtic influence without the long-term survival of Celtic languages is also found in various regions across Europe, including parts of Italy, Austria, and the Czech Republic

>The concept of the Celtic nations is widely promoted by pan-Celtic movements, including political and cultural organizations like the Celtic League or International Celtic Congress
Anonymous No.18090039 [Report]
>>18090026
Quibbles.
Anonymous No.18090041 [Report] >>18090046
>>18090038
>David Reich's laboratory found that 90% of Britain's Neolithic gene pool was overturned by a population from North Continental Europe characterised by the Bell Beaker culture around 1200 BC who carried a large amount of Yamnaya ancestry from the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, including the R1b Haplogroup. This population lacked genetic affinity to other Bell Beaker populations, such as the Iberian Bell Beakers, but appeared to be an offshoot of the Corded Ware single grave people. It is currently unknown whether these Beaker peoples went on to develop Celtic languages in the British Isles, or whether later Celtic migrations introduced Celtic languages to Britain

>The close genetic affinity of these Beaker people to Continental North Europeans means that British and Irish populations cluster genetically very closely with other Northwest European populations, regardless of how much Anglo-Saxon and Viking ancestry was introduced during the 1st century
Anonymous No.18090046 [Report] >>18090049
>>18090041
>The 2022 genetic study on modern English people, published by Nature, showed that the average English person is some combination of 25-47% Anglo-Saxon (some of that could have come from later Scandinavian influence because the Angles, Saxons and Jutes were really similar), 14-57% pre-Saxon Briton, and the remainder, if any, is filled by French influence from after the Anglo-Saxon invasion. The study also showed that people of 100% pre-Saxon Briton dna were buried in the same way that an Anglo-Saxon might be buried, with items indicating the same status as other Anglo-Saxons

>All of this means that the Anglo-Saxons came on large numbers, but they didn’t replace or genocide the natives. The two groups heavily mixed and the Britons in England assimilated to Anglo-Saxon culture. Then, probably at several points afterward, Frenchmen came in waves to further affect the English gene pool (Frankish migrants, the Normans, the Huguenots, etc.)

>Pic related: Red = Anglo-Saxon, blue = Briton, green = French. If I messed anything up, I’m sure an anon will correct me
Anonymous No.18090049 [Report] >>18090060
>>18090046
Phenotype.
Anonymous No.18090060 [Report] >>18090063
>>18090049
Anonymous No.18090063 [Report]
>>18090060
Anonymous No.18090074 [Report]
>>18089662 (OP)
>poverty is universal
someone give this guy a medal, did you know that latino culture is also very similar to white culture with the only difference coming from food and linguistics? yes, they in fact do follow traditional catholic values and place a lot of value on family just like southern europeans, even their language bears a striking similarity to spanish language, who could have guessed
no shit american blacks have similar culture to the whites of america, they have been living in us for a few centuries and ghetto culture is a pretty new thing that came with crack cocaine and the music industry being shilled to them