The fact that no matter how photorealistic a picture looks you can always tell if it's AI-generated is damning proof soul is real.
Anonymous
10/22/2025, 1:46:11 AM
No.18095208
[Report]
>>18094551 (OP)
You know it's ai because the bread-horse is unlikely to exist, not because the image is low quality. If it had a more likely subject it'd be basically indistinguishable. If the viewer is stupid enough to believe the bread horse, then it's good enough now
Anonymous
10/22/2025, 11:18:42 AM
No.18096157
[Report]
Most A.I. images have an even amount of light and dark in the image because of how the technology works. That's easy to pick up on.
Then most people are sloppy and don't correct the obvious flaws in their image with photoshop or gimp. In the OP picture the background could have been removed (with A.I.) and then regenerated as a background fill with a completely different prompt, thus making it look different from the foreground image. Then these layers can be color graded to mask the light/dark issue mentioned earlier. Areas of the image can also be inpainted and regenerated, although often this will result in a noticeable tell unless very well blended in photoshop.
