What does capitalist literature say about this? Did the founding fathers, John Locke, Murray Rothbard, or Hitler predict the master race resorting to stuff like this to live? Does this fall in line with the "survival of the fittest" mantra they preach?
>>18100020
>>18100003 (OP)
Thomas Jefferson was all for Islam and was basically a leftist. Adam Smith was about resource depletion and never mentioned markets or anything related at all. Malthusian classical economics just sees immigration as another resource drain.
The pol obsession with race doesn't mean anything and isn't a normal position because normally race is just an aspect of other problems and not a black cock fixation like his has, since his is a retard board.
You just won't find anyone in the past mentioning race because racism was invented by 4chan and the historical racism was very superficial and instrumental and not an ideology. This immediately proves why his is retarded as race and immigration are completely new issues, and the first immigration laws were against Asians.
Because market economics is so obviously zero sum and meaningless you also won't find any deep discussion of any issue in market economics especially since they were all boomers and nothing existed back then. Nazi Germany had open borders and there is no evidence Hitler was racist. All of that was invented by psyops in the sixties and later that tried to undermine conservatives by burdening them with unpopular positions but his is retarded and actually buys the psyop.
Malthusianism is the actual correct approach to everything because everyone just dies and fails and immigration is just another idea that fails, and everyone with common sense just has this perspective hence no real immigration writing outside his, a retard board. The "competes wages" type arguments are also just a poorly phrases understanding of this issue and Smith did note that population growth would compete wages.
>>18100003 (OP)
Thomas Jefferson was all for Islam and was basically a leftist. Adam Smith was about resource depletion and never mentioned markets or anything related at all. Malthusian classical economics just sees immigration as another resource drain.
The pol obsession with race doesn't mean anything and isn't a normal position because normally race is just an aspect of other problems and not a black cock fixation like his has, since his is a retard board.
You just won't find anyone in the past mentioning race because racism was invented by 4chan and the historical racism was very superficial and instrumental and not an ideology. This immediately proves why his is retarded as race and immigration are completely new issues, and the first immigration laws were against Asians.
Because market economics is so obviously zero sum and meaningless you also won't find any deep discussion of any issue in market economics especially since they were all boomers and nothing existed back then. Nazi Germany had open borders and there is no evidence Hitler was racist. All of that was invented by psyops in the sixties and later that tried to undermine conservatives by burdening them with unpopular positions but his is retarded and actually buys the psyop.
Malthusianism is the actual correct approach to everything because everyone just dies and fails and immigration is just another idea that fails, and everyone with common sense just has this perspective hence no real immigration writing outside his, a retard board. The "competes wages" type arguments are also just a poorly phrases understanding of this issue and Smith did note that population growth would compete wages.
