Muslims are already coping with the al-Zutt and have provided “explanations” that are obviously lies. Here I am to debunk them.
Nowhere in the text does it say they were Djinn, it only refers to them as al-Zuṭṭ (الزُّطُّ). The Zutt were Indians who migrated to Arabia during Sassanid-times and the name “Zutt” is an Arabized form of “Jat”. “Riden” is a translation of the words yarkabūna (يَرْكَبُونَ) meaning “they ride” and rakibūh (رَكِبُوهُ) meaning “they rode him”, they both deprive from the root word *rakiba* (رَكِبَ) meaning “to ride” and all of these words can be used in a sexual context in Classical Arabic. “Crowding around” is a more obscure usage of the word and even if the Hadith was about the Zutt following him around, the imagery still would be hilarious as fuck since the text says they were naked.
It was narrated by one of the most trusted reciters of the Quran, Abdullah ibn Masud, it is part of the Aahih al-Bukhari (the collection of canonical Hadiths), and most scholars agree it’s real. Even if you think the Hadith is “weak,” it doesn’t change the fact that someone decided to write it down and the fact that it wasn’t among the Hadiths burnt for being “forgeries” means that it was considered to be legit.
Taqiyya isn’t working Muslims. Just admit your “anti-gay” prophet took BBC and enjoyed it.
Nowhere in the text does it say they were Djinn, it only refers to them as al-Zuṭṭ (الزُّطُّ). The Zutt were Indians who migrated to Arabia during Sassanid-times and the name “Zutt” is an Arabized form of “Jat”. “Riden” is a translation of the words yarkabūna (يَرْكَبُونَ) meaning “they ride” and rakibūh (رَكِبُوهُ) meaning “they rode him”, they both deprive from the root word *rakiba* (رَكِبَ) meaning “to ride” and all of these words can be used in a sexual context in Classical Arabic. “Crowding around” is a more obscure usage of the word and even if the Hadith was about the Zutt following him around, the imagery still would be hilarious as fuck since the text says they were naked.
It was narrated by one of the most trusted reciters of the Quran, Abdullah ibn Masud, it is part of the Aahih al-Bukhari (the collection of canonical Hadiths), and most scholars agree it’s real. Even if you think the Hadith is “weak,” it doesn’t change the fact that someone decided to write it down and the fact that it wasn’t among the Hadiths burnt for being “forgeries” means that it was considered to be legit.
Taqiyya isn’t working Muslims. Just admit your “anti-gay” prophet took BBC and enjoyed it.
