← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 18136917

40 posts 18 images /his/
Anonymous No.18136917 [Report] >>18137025 >>18137026 >>18137037 >>18137514 >>18139343 >>18140160
>wants to overthrow capitalism and create a communist utopia
>all they manage to do is create industrial feudalism

good job lenin
Anonymous No.18137012 [Report] >>18137653
Still an upgrade
Anonymous No.18137025 [Report] >>18137053 >>18137464 >>18137579 >>18137584 >>18138926 >>18138991 >>18139342 >>18139793 >>18139800 >>18139899
>>18136917 (OP)
>wants to overthrow capitalism and create a communist utopia
>they succeeded so hard that stormniggers call it fascism in a desperate attempt to regain some credibility and capitalists call it "not real communism" thereby becoming the same commies they always mocked
The Chinese century will be glorious.
Anonymous No.18137026 [Report]
>>18136917 (OP)
What the fuck does "industrial feudalism" even mean? Do liberals just bundle random words together hoping they mean something?
Anonymous No.18137037 [Report] >>18137045
>>18136917 (OP)
Anonymous No.18137045 [Report]
>>18137037
>the successful
>it's just a bunch of jews who got rich off not paying employees real wages and sucking off the government
Huh?
Anonymous No.18137053 [Report]
>>18137025
>it will start concurrent with the Indian century
The Horsemen of Famine and Pestilence reporting
Anonymous No.18137464 [Report]
>>18137025
who would you rather kill a Chinese millionaire or an American working class man?
ReplyGuy No.18137514 [Report] >>18137605
>>18136917 (OP)
The USA wanted to invent a modern egalitarian democratic republic and only managed to build a kleptocratic neo-feudalist banana republic run by a criminal mafia oligarchy
Anonymous No.18137579 [Report] >>18138725
>>18137025
>"Chinese Century"
>Already 1/4th the way through the 21st century
>China is still considered a third world developing country
Sinobros...
Anonymous No.18137584 [Report] >>18138725
>>18137025
>over a billion people make less than 2000 USD a month
Anonymous No.18137605 [Report] >>18137616
>>18137514
>USA wanted to invent a modern egalitarian democratic republic
I'm not sure that's even the case. Only rich people could vote. It was an oligarchy from the beginning. A dictatorship of the merchant class.
Anonymous No.18137612 [Report] >>18137633
Please define "industrial feudalism" if you make this accusation
Anonymous No.18137616 [Report] >>18137618
>>18137605
Letting poor vote is the worst idea ever.
Anonymous No.18137618 [Report] >>18137629 >>18137632
>>18137616
Share your schema. Who gets to vote in your utopia?
Anonymous No.18137629 [Report] >>18137643
>>18137618
Honestly, what use the state even has? Anything it can do the markets would do better due to incentives.
Anonymous No.18137632 [Report] >>18137643
>>18137618
Only people who pass an IQ test and receive a 100 (average) or higher are allowed to vote. This will weed out 90% of southern voters of course but it's a sacrifice I'm sure we're all willing to make
Anonymous No.18137633 [Report]
>>18137612
Not him but in the late USSR local party leaders often treated their regions as personal fiefdoms. It was especially pronounced in national republics of Caucasus and Middle Asia, especially Georgia and Uzbekistan, the latter of which became the center of the biggest criminal case in the whole Union
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uzbek_cotton_scandal
Anonymous No.18137643 [Report] >>18137647 >>18137823
>>18137629
This doesn't even make sense. Governments are not states, a state is the government plus everything outside of it, including religion and culture. As far as the markets doing "better", markets only seek to expand and are at the whims of its most pernicious interlocuters. There's no built in justice in a market, it has to be produced and put onto the markets. The markets only want to expand themselves, which is basically what liberalism is. Liberalism is just the cultural side of capitalism. Liberalism also doesn't survive when war is on the table and neither do free markets.

>>18137632
>This will weed out 90% of southern voters of course but it's a sacrifice I'm sure we're all willing to make
Do you realize southern is a euphemism for black people or...?
Anonymous No.18137647 [Report] >>18137659
>>18137643
>Do you realize southern is a euphemism for black people or...?
black, white, whatever they are, a lot of stupid people come from there, and their loss on the ballots will be a sacrifice I'm sure we're all willing to make
Anonymous No.18137653 [Report]
>>18137012
Russia had the fastest-growing GDP in the world just before WW1. They didn't need Bolsheviks to create industrial feudalism.
Anonymous No.18137659 [Report] >>18137666
>>18137647
It's important you understand that the IQ rates are directly correspondent to race and when you say the southern US has a low IQ that you are distinctly referring to ghetto culture in places like Atlanta and Memphis. Maybe you forgot you were on 4chan thinking that no one would point this out, or maybe you thought you were doing some weird democratic "gotcha" but it's also worth remembering that Hawaii is a liberal stronghold and it's consistently ranked as having one of the lowest IQs in the country.
Anonymous No.18137666 [Report] >>18137672
>>18137659
What the fuck is this schizo crashout? Are you a low-IQ southerner perhaps?
Anonymous No.18137672 [Report]
>>18137666
Are you black or a dedicated liberalist? It's got to be one of the two. Either way, you wouldn't be able to vote in your own system.
Anonymous No.18137823 [Report]
>>18137643
>Governments are not states, a state is the government plus everything outside of it, including religion and culture.

No, what you're referring to is called a nation. A nation is properly defined as a group of people with shared ethnicity and culture. The form of government that they have doesn't factor into it unless they have a traditional form that is part of their culture.

The state refers to the jurisdiction of a governing body which rules over that nation, it does not have to necessarily belong natively to the people who constitute a nation.
For example the case of an occupation state.
Nations proper do not have borders. States do. A state can contain multiple nations within it.
Anonymous No.18138725 [Report] >>18138729
>>18137579
>>18137584
Grocery bill status?
Anonymous No.18138729 [Report]
>>18138725
>Grocery bill status?
You aren't billed for buying groceries my uneducated tankie ESL friend, what you are likely referring to is a receipt
Anonymous No.18138926 [Report] >>18139790
>>18137025
I can’t take people who predict communist victory this century seriously. Communists have literally never beaten Islamists and the world’s Muslim population is growing rapidly.
Anonymous No.18138935 [Report]
>One of the most centralized state governments in human history.
>Brainlets literally call any centralizing efforts "communism!" because of them.
>"Industrial feudalism."
Anonymous No.18138991 [Report]
>>18137025
Two of the five stars on their flag stand for the bourgeoisie moron
Anonymous No.18139342 [Report]
>>18137025
>stormniggers call it fascism
>capitalists call it "not real communism"
They're both right
Anonymous No.18139343 [Report]
>>18136917 (OP)
The elite know they have to use capitalism to keep the ship afloat. They "allow" it for just the degree they need to not starve to death en masse. Even then they have actual concentration camps right now, textbook leftism.
Anonymous No.18139790 [Report] >>18139813
>>18138926
Islam has been irrelevant since the 17th century. You psyoped yourself so hard you refuse to believe that commies won because China isn't run by trannies or jews. So it simply can't be real communism in your mindbroken head.
Anonymous No.18139793 [Report]
>>18137025
It is fascism, CCP is textbook fascism that is no different from Nazi Germany, they only need to invade Taiwan for the bingo
Anonymous No.18139800 [Report]
>>18137025
china is succeeding mostly because americans are retarded and keep destroying their own economy to "own the libs"
Anonymous No.18139813 [Report]
>>18139790
I agree that China is communist, I am arguing that given demographic and religious trends, there is no chance that the global socialist society predicted by Marxists will ever emerge.

>Islam has been irrelevant since the 17th century.
Everything since 1979 proves you wrong. Today several of the worlds most powerful countries (Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Qatar) are entirely or to some degree Muslim theocracies. Other big countries (Pakistan, Indonesia) are nominally democratic/secular but with significant Islamic control of society. In the Sahel secular/socialist forces are getting crushed by jihadists. Communism may have temporary wins in East Asia and perhaps even the West, but it is doomed in the long run.
Anonymous No.18139899 [Report] >>18139902
>>18137025
>Chinese century
>First time in History that China's demographics are below population replacement rate
Sinocommies are literally worse overlords than Manchu steppenigs
Anonymous No.18139902 [Report] >>18139915
>>18139899
To be fair basically everyone except Africans and Pakistanis/Afghans are in the same boat. If everyone declines China still comes out ahead
Anonymous No.18139915 [Report]
>>18139902
Again, just because you use whataboutism at a global scale does not detract from the fact that modern China isn't functionally sustainable while the agrarian absolute Qing regime was
Anonymous No.18140160 [Report]
>>18136917 (OP)
COMMUNISM IS THE WORST