>>18144360 (OP)
Probably not but the topography of the physical universe at least begs the question, namely, there are huge low-energy areas where nothing seems to change for billions of years and there are also high-energy areas where billions of changes happen every day. A fundamentally causal and predestined universe sees no distinction between the two, and that may be. However the prima facie evidence seems to suggest these large masses and energy concentrations are part of the chain reaction, visible results AND causes. That would mean we're in a position to affect change at least on a perceptible level. And that would mean several possible futures exist. Suppose the world moves toward an expected outcome with momentum, tiny events can happen at random without affecting it, but trillions of such events continuously produces a randomizing effect on the whole. That process could be what we're witnessing, it could be what existence "is", the moment of defining the future.
Psychic phenomena and ghosts are thought to be errors in the human predictive faculty, where something that could exist doesn't exist. What if they're errors in the universe? Echoes of the possible world that shed off like dead skin. That would explain why you can't use them to change the momentum of the larger universe, they're tiny flakes and it is massive. If there's any leeway in causality at all, the universe is one big future predicting machine that's constantly adjusting.
