Thread 18146217

If Americans in the 30s could see the state of the modern world, would they have joined the axis?

>>18146217 (OP)
There's no evidence Hitler was racist. Nazi Germany had open borders. No physical evidence for battle of stalingrad.
Nazis were the anti colonial leftist side and Americans created the meme Nazis were rightwing despite all those positions being allied.

>>18146217 (OP)
Probably not but who knows
>>18146224
Kill yourself

>>18146217 (OP)
The only thing that could have saved the modern world from existing would have been a Soviet-Italian pact splitting Europe between each other. Followed by a nuclear holocaust of the Americas. Only the victory of the Totalitarian man over the Modernist man could have saved the world. The Modernist civilization (Latam + the United States and Canada) needed to be destroyed by a Totalitarian civilization (Fascist Italy and the Soviets were both on the process of becoming this before being destroyed by Judea) or else modernity would exist. Sadly, they failed.

>>18146217 (OP)
everyone would have, except, you know whom

>>18146217 (OP)
>Hitler and troons are the only two factions in history!!1!
Your brain is worthless.

if anything Hitler could be blamed for making racism and nationalism uncool forever, as well as giving leftists a permanent boogeyman to yell about

>>18146217 (OP)
I don't think they would have joined the axis, but they would have remained neutral, which pretty much guarantees Germany's victory. Even left-leaning Americans in the 30's would be considered racists by modern standards.

>>18146217 (OP)
If they somehow got a glimpse into the future with 100% certainty it was true?
Yes. Yes. A trillion billion percent yes. This is not remotely even a question

>>18146346
See >>18146302. I recommend a lobotomy.

>>18146217 (OP)
No. Nazism, communism, and other forms of totalitarianisms is such an antithesis to the American ideal for society that they wouldn't.
If anything, they would've seen it as future dystopia and done things differently post ww2 rather than join the Axis which had it's own dysptopian vision for society.
>>18146302
Seems to be a common sentiment among poltards since I've seen it so much.
I can't tell whether they just use it as a talking point or whether they're just that braindead.

>>18146527
They're just that braindead.

>>18146375
nobody likes you, jewish troon

Can someone post the thing showing WW2-era opinions of Americans? I remember one saying that 90%+ would prefer losing the war than ending segregation or something

>>18146610
It's undeniable that Americans wanted no part in the war. Farther Coughlin was enormously popular. The nick Fuentes of his day. Henry Ford has written about Jews in the 20s. American bund was a thing though even the nazis thought they were dumb spergs.

>>18146527
>totalitarianisms
USA is just as totalitarian if not even more so
yet some people argue picrel isn't a personality cult

>>18146858
>It's undeniable that Americans wanted no part in the war.
Americans tend not to care about the rest of the world, and especially back in the 1930s, most Americans wouldn't have cared that much about what was happening outside of their town. For most of its history, the U.S. could afford not to care.

There were also "America Firsters" in the 1930s who wanted to keep the U.S. out of war, and Trump has tapped into this sentiment. But once Japan attacked Pearl Harbor that isolationist stuff flew out the window. Charles Lindbergh supported the war because his attitude is that, at the end of the day, he was a patriot and America had been attacked and America had to win.

>Farther Coughlin was enormously popular. The nick Fuentes of his day.
I think his popularity might be overstated a bit and dramatized as more of a "threat" than he really was. Also his popularity fell sharply once he started openly praising Hitler and the Catholic Church ordered him to shut up.

>>18146314
somehow Stalin wasn't able to do that for the right

>>18146902
>Americans tend not to care about the rest of the world

Bibi would disagree