Post your assessments, critiques but most importantly your work.

Rate me by my last "major" finished work.

I have zero idea where I fall on the scale

>>7619933 (OP)
Alright!

>>7619964
Oops forgor pic

>>7619933 (OP)

>>7619939
Mid int
>>7619950
Mid int
>>7619966
Prebeg
>>7619967
Low beg

>>7619933 (OP)
I'm not sure if I can assign someone on any level, but these are my drawings

>>7619933 (OP)
I have been drawing for 64 days and i dont think i have improved much, i learned the loomis method for drawing faces, i started like 20 days ago to do gesture drawing and tried to do some portraits.

>>7620036
Here some drawings of real people faces, its really difficult.

>>7620037
Now i stop spaming my shit, bye.

>>7620038
>>7620037
>>7620036
beg starter set
>>7620022
mid beg
>>7619967
still beg but has potential
>>7619966
beg but alright
>>7619950
probably starting the intdom
>>7619939
this scares me on a deeper level

>>7620036
>>7620037
>>7620038
nah you're here forever, or at least when you post your work from 64 days ago.

>>7620040
What do you mean here forever?

>>7620043
This could be you. But you have to work for it! Never stop drawing!

>>7620044
i guess you are telling me im going to take years to get to int level, ok anon.

>>7620039
This guy pretty much got it right, so I'll just second his ratings.

I just really like watercolor

Post last thread but got no rating :(

>>7620071
Mid /int/

>>7620036
high /beg/, but if you made these faces from imagination then you got insane potential.

Reminder:
You draw figgies in a void?
>You're probably still /beg/!
You have one thing you're really good at and you're avoiding drawing anything else?
>You're probably still /beg/!
90% of your work posted is doodles and sketches?
>You're probably still /beg/!
You do not have a routine pipeline which leads you to finished artwork?
>You're probably still /beg/!

>>7620089
so the key to get to int is to understand perspective and draw environments, right? you can only get so far drawing faces i guess, i will take that in mind i really dont know how to draw shit in perspective, i can draw the points and lines but my brain cant fill the empty space.

its the most decent i have

and this one

>>7620098
I think being int is more about finding a place for yourself than specific knowledge. Your art has to look confident enough to be considered int

>>7620406
>Can execute challenging drawings with some success. Shows proficiency in all fundamentals

>>7620098
yes because
>Shows proficiency in all fundamentals

>>7619933 (OP)
People giving ratings should have to have their work attached to their post.

>>7620442
Me: >>7619939
My ratings: >>7620039
Also ratings by me:
>>7620070
could go either way between high beg and low int, depending on whether this is from a photo / from life / from imagination
>>7620071
somewhere on the middle/high beg spectrum
>>7620160
hard to tell because it looks unfinished
but I personally avoid looking at anime art so I'm rarely able to properly give ratings for these
I wanna say mid/high beg but if you can properly render then it might be higher
>>7620177
>>7620179
high beg-ish but not without appeal. has potential

>>7620442
Now you!

Latest thing I've drawn. Lighting and especially shadows are still a god damn bitch for me to figure out.

>>7620483
easily high int IF the colors were better
now it looks a muddy mid /beg/ mess

>>7620490

What is wrong with the colors?

I rate based on subjective terms so take it as you will
>>7619939
adv

>>7619950
high beg. Could be int/ but your coloring hold you down.

>>7619967
mid to high beg

>>7620022
a little wonky but low int

>>7620037
true beg

>>7620070
high int

>>7620071
high beg

>>7620160
low to mid int

>>7620177
high beg. I like the armosphere, could be high int if you polished your execution

>>7620483
The drawing is ambitious in itself. I feel like giving it around low int, but the colors (the background, the character itself is alright) bring it down to high-beg.

>>7620495
im no good with color cuz i render in monochrome but you can definitely use more contrast, also rim lights and all that jazz
look up some tutorials on lighting, shadows etc. itll help make shit look more professional
i fucked around with it for 10 minutes and did a very shitty job trying to explain what im talking about so i recommend you to actually look up someone who knows his shit about color and lighting but i hope it helps illustrate my point

>>7620501
bro is giving high ratings because he wants his art inflated, which is high /int/ to early /adv/ no doubt. But that's why posting your work with your ratings can work against you. People aren't always honest with their ratings because they have ulterior motives.

>>7620070
Like I think this one is not high /int/, maybe mid /beg/.

>>7620501
mid beg
line art is int level but the coloring is low beg
that top hand is also beg

>>7620501
>>7620453
thank you both


'' if you polished your execution'' thats indeed still a thing i struggle with but will continue to practice

>>7620502
Hmm, you are right, I hadn't even considered the light reflected from the seal on the doorway. I had mostly just concerned myself with the light seeping into the room from the opening in the wall and the windows, and the shadows cast by that light.

>>7620514
Gaining skill is also about knowing what things to steal from artists you admire. Grab a lot, devour it, turn it into your own creative flesh and muscle.

>>7620507
>bro is giving high ratings because he wants his art inflated, which is high /int/ to early /adv/ no doubt. But that's why posting your work with your ratings can work against you. People aren't always honest with their ratings because they have ulterior motives.
Spoken like a true begcel. If you think I was too generous with my ratings, maybe the problem is you.

>>7620070
You could sell this and someone would buy it, frame it.

>>7620535
that makes him /pro/

Honestly I wouldn't mind some advice, especially about lineart and rendering.

>>7620542
That depends on your definition of "professional".
His drawing may not have the technical skill that the average retard here would think that should be the minimum for something to be "sellable", but it has other things that make it a viable product.

>>7620039
>still beg but has potential
What am I missing?

>>7620557
i think /pro/ means getting paid for your work
if you sell your art, no matter how shitty, you're /pro/
skill is a whole other thing

>>7620573
/pro/ is more about having a job that requires constant content production like in the art industry or maintaining a Patreon that pays your rent. It's not about your mom giving you ten bucks for a drawing that one time ten years ago.

>>7620577
i mean yeah obviously doesnt count if your mom buys it out of pity
if strangers want to buy your artwork, or you work in the art industry, you're /pro/ imo

>>7620573
this thread is about the chart. you can be mid beg on the chart and make consistent money, that's still not pro. pro = manifest mastery

>>7619939
>SOVL

>>7620551
Either suicide or antidepressants

>>7619950
The flat color guys look very nice, but definitely gets iffy when you try shading them. Best in thread so far appeal-wise. Still giving you a high /beg/, but like really good high /beg/.

>>7620501
Low /int/. Those blending modes are really escaping your grasp. The color is really the biggest fault here, it's like the polar opposite of muddy. Everything is so saturated and blown out it's a bit painful to look at. This one is rough on it's own, but I've seen your art before and you're pretty well rounded regardless.

>>7620642
If you're who I think you are give me your socials, I'm pretty sure I've been trying to find you for a minute

>>7620642
fair, I might have gone too far in the highlights, but a bit odd of you call out the saturation cuz pretty much I do saturated stuff al the time, this is nothing new.

>>7620642
Placed firmly in int territory, maybe even making money of it
>>7620551
what a terrible day to have eyes
I mean high beg, maybe
please, for the sake of humanity, work on your taste
>>7620502
>>7620483
high beg but you have amibitions and that's what's needed to gmi
>>7620501
you are trapped in the uncanny limbo between beg and int
many never make it out of that valley
you need to draw more and also to diversify your approach to learn more things

Also, please stop rating me int or even adv. I couldn't draw a box in perspective if you put a gun to my head and forced me to.

>>7620642
easy mid /int/ possibly higher
>>7620551
mid-high /beg/ somewhat of a polished turd, hands are especially rough
>>7620501
hard to look at honestly, some things are /int/ but overall effect is mid /beg/
>>7620483
low /int/ cool shit but ugly colors
>>7620177
>7620179
high /beg/ need to push yourself a bit more

>>7620683 cont.
>>7620160
/int/ if you can finish it, mid /beg/ otherwise
>>7620071
low /int/ if you can ground the figure
>>7620070
high /beg/ - low /int/ pretty
>>7620036
>7620037
>7620038
low /beg/

>7620684 cont.
>>7620022
mid-high /beg/
>>7619967
high /beg/ - low /int/
>>7619966
mid /beg/
>>7619950
low /int/ borderline
>>7619939
not much technical challenge on display but mid /int/ in overall effect

I don't think I'm in the position to rate others

>>7620695
This is neat, though it looks traced.
If not traced, it's just a question of polish/finish.

Last time I posted this only two people replied and they said I was beg, but they didn't say how beg. So let me try again

>>7620713
low/mid /beg/
your lines are especially problematic here, no line weight variation, and wobbly quality

>>7620721
I draw with a mouse...

>>7620724
why is that my problem faggot, I'm telling you what's making your work look beg

>>7620726
Where did I say it was your problem you retarded faggot? I was just explaining why it looks like that.

>>7620730
'explanations' in response to crit always sound like excuses.
if it looks bad because you're drawing in a retarded way then either stop doing it or figure out how to make it look good (like say, lean into low res/ms paint stuff).

>>7620737
>explanations' in response to crit always sound like excuses.
If you don't bother to understand the reasoning of why a person draws the way they do, how can you give constructive criticism?

>>7620737
>>7620741
kiss already, you two

>>7620671
Top /pro/

>>7620713
Actually isn't terrible for a mouse, or a tablet for that matter, other anon is a cockeater. Still /beg/ though.

>>7620653
https://notfuji.neocities.org/

>>7620713
Low Beg
Please refer to the chart in >>7619933 (OP) for explanation

>>7620724
I would suggest not drawing with a mouse

>>7620741
you're not that special that it takes some kind of unique understanding of your choices to tell you your lines are shit.
if you can't take simple crit like 'your wobbly, unweighted lines make your art look beg' then you're even worse off than I thought
>le constructive criticism
just go back

>>7620745
>Low Beg
FUCK! NOT AGAIN!

>I would suggest not drawing with a mouse
I know. I'll get a tablet someday

>>7620747
>Doesn't care about giving decent critique
As expected. Just another crab hiding behind the "If you can't take my shit crit you're a pussy" mask. Well, enough of it. You still helped a little.

>>7620753
well argued good sir, have an upvote

>>7620671
Fat women are literally the only thing that keeps me going
>>7620683
Yea I need to grind hands much more.

Last few doodles i was happy with
>>7620762
based bbw enjoyer

>>7620744
Ah ok I was right. Thanks for the link.

>>7620551
I hate you tier
>>7620683
It's so muddy. It's good but it's like you're purposefully not making a clear image. I dunno.
Still better than me tier.
>>7620695
Face looks like asuka to me tier
>>7620713
1 of the 3 mouse anons I see posting tier

>>7620806
DARKNESS
very cool by the way

>>7620894
Is this those Mr and Mrs feelings cartoons from the 70s?

>>7620894
confidently /beg/ and you will stay there unless you draw a shitton more
>>7620806
still beg but you might move out of it if you keep at it. Your next step will be to draw finished compositions
>>7620770
/fun/beg
>>7620713
Yeah, you're definitely beg. Part of your journey as an artist is also to overcome the limitations of your art supplies. Either by being better shit of to become a master at using them.
>>7620695
very beg but I see a bit potential in there
>>7620683
a ton of studies and very little original work. posting a collage gives off a bit of insecurity. Get rid of that insecurity and become more of your own but in a bolder way

>>7620962
>posting a collage gives off a bit of insecurity
posting a collage (of non studies) is more accurate though

>>7620969
maybe but it's more fun if just a single original work is posted and judged

Last one i put some effort into

>>7620974
Not your best. Hatching looks sloppier, but your inking looks even

>>7620044
Thanks to 4chan every single time i see a coment with exclamation marks i inmediatly think its passive aggressive.

>>7620988
Good catch!

>>7621008
Shut up woman

>>7620572
it still looks like a study
turn it into a piece that looks finished
either by more rendering or color

>>7621063
>it still looks like a study
It’s all from imagination.
But yea, I do need to start rendering and coloring more.

>>7620520
hells yeah i will
its actually kind of how i started
i wanted to draw like them so i went for it and started out by copying what they did and then it went from there that i could give my own spin or make my actual own stuff (like what brushes I found comfortable and stuff)_

>>7620962
>Get rid of that insecurity and become more of your own but in a bolder way
good advice anon, thanks
I didn't want to mass rate without posting plenty of work but studies can be a crutch

he supposed to have 6 fingers i swear

>>7620701
>>7620831
>>7620962
Any better?

>>7621523
....are you using a mouse?

>>7621523
slightly better looking but your skill level has not yet improved
this is a longer process. just keep drawing and challenge yourself every other day

>>7621550
No I'm just bad at drawing lines on a tablet

>>7621565
Well your lines are terrible, I would start working on that before color or rendering.
You're not prebeg though, you're firmly lowbeg

>>7621589
I think my line quality was better back when I was doing trad, not sure what to do about it

>>7621589
how is he low beg from the shitty line quality? You have to zoom in to even tell

>>7621660
This looks way better, midbeg

>>7621660
An improvement for sure but still /beg/
I think the difference in quality going from trad to digital might be from a change in your tempo caused by the difference in texture/tactile feedback. You might be pressing down too hard or too light. Find whatever pressure best enables you to make bold lines and feel the form.

Also, aside from all that, you still can’t see in 3d. Make that a priority.

>>7621660
I recognize that hatching style. I had a doodlezbd phase too lmao.

>>7621660
Your digital brush choice is just crap.

I feel deeply offended when I get called a beg, but when seeing so many anons with beautiful art also getting called a beg in here I don't know what to think. I don't understand this board.

>>7621696
beg is skill level not how appealing or pretty your art is. look at the chart

>>7621700
I seriously cannot separate the two. I always thought appeal and skill went hand in hand.

>>7621700
then what's really the point if lots of ints make ugly art and lots of begs make beautiful art?

>>7621696
The majority of this board is beg. Its a fairly broad term
For example:
This
>>7620483
and
>>7619967
Are both beg, despite there being an obvious skill gap

>>7621703
i don't see the skill gap, just looks like they're very different styles

>>7621705
Oh nevermind, I checked the black and white persons twitter and they're significantly more skilled

>>7621696
don't take it too seriously. I've posted sketches by professional artists in these threads and people called it beg and condescendingly told me to keep grinding.

>>7621715
Haha. I should try that sometime...

>>7621696
Dude half of the board doesn't even draw. And their rankings are sometimes so fucking strange it's hilarious.

>>7621715
hehe, I do that all the time
(the professional artist in this case is me)

>>7621702
I don't get it neither. I've seen anons who grinded for years to get to int but once they get there they can't even make an appealing comic/manga or get a decent following on Twitter. Skill is no substitute for heart.

>>7621731
>>7621706
>>7621702
Success, appeal, power level, and skill level are four distinct things that can relate to each other but don't necessarily have to. This thread is about skill level. If people don't feel accurately rated they can try to establish an appeal level thread.

>>7621735
Fuck, I meant to say "success, appeal, and skill level". Yes, I am retard.

>>7621735
If that's the case then you need to change description for /pro/ because it implies anyone making money off their art is /pro/ level regardless of artistic ablities.

>>7621735
Fair enough.

>they can try to establish an appeal level thread
I was actually thinking of doing something like that. Though not as a rating method...

>>7621696
>>7621715
>>7621721
There needs to be a requirement in these threads to pyw along with your rankings/crits. Also a requirement to have some kind of explanation for each ranking.

>>7621748
I agree.

My last finished work.

I know it's flawed, but I need to know my powerlevel, even if it's low; I need to know where I stand so I can adjust my expectations and what to work on.

>>7621753
absolutely degenerated but probably high /mid/ because of composition and color
It would look better if one of the bottom two figures was mirrored

>>7621743
low/beg/, got some potential

>>7621739
Do you not see the first two words in the description?

>>7621748
Sure why not. What work did you post and Ill post mine and crit.

>>7621748
why stop there? I want a fully ghettoized /ic/ everyone wearing badges with /beg/ /int/ or /adv/

>>7621835
based
anonymous /ic/ is a plague
so many /beg/ schizos giving you toxic advice leading nowhere

>>7621835
This but unironically. Post IDs that display the poster’s work when hovered over.

Here's my work. I'll try to give some others feedback as well.
>>7620762
Nice lines. I feel like any criticisms I could make are all minor stuff that will come in time. Please keep drawing fat girls.
>>7620806
It's beg but not bad. I think proportions need work.
>>7620894
Sovl.
>>7620974
I like the idea but something about the body feels a little too 'boxy' to me. Just keep on the anatomy grind
>>7621435
Probably a more dynamic pose would convey the character better, looks like a cool idea though.
>>7621743
Can't quite tell if he's shitting a turtle out or farting flames out to burn a turtle. I respect a minimalist style but maybe work on the readability.

Quick little portrait.

Forever doomed to lowbeg

barely ever finish anything but do I qualify for /int/flation anons

>>7622150
>barely ever finish anything
No.

>>7622150
>barely ever finish anything
early /beg/ then

Ive been trying to animate stuff but its way too hard, i cant imagine doing movements like running and such.

>>7619933 (OP)

>>7622150
The rendering feels like mossa, did you study him?

>>7622268
Any animation is witchcraft as far as I'm concerned

>>7622383
Ye, however as my laptop's broken down I've been having issues doing consistent master studies. Just been doing sketches and exercises in the meantime

>>7619933 (OP)
Hai! Just finished this one yesterday!!

>>7622129
Even your handwriting is low /beg/ dude

>>7622573
Topkek

>>7622273
high /beg/ to low /int/

>>7622564
beggish when you zoom in. Overall values are pleasing to look at though.
>>7622273
seconding that high beg / low int assessment earlier. There's an ease and a flow in the lines that suggest a certain routine
>>7622268
definitely beg but I respect everyone who even attempts animation. Ganbatte, namefag
>>7622150
draw more
>>7622129
Your handwriting is horrible. Practice even handwriting first, not even kidding.
>>7622125
somewhere beg but probably mid beg
>>7621951
That one is a bit harder to rate. There's a lot of good in there and also a lot of bad. High beg maybe?

>>7622948
>7622564
thanks!
also i just rendered over a rough sketch so i didnt get everything with the intentions of it being a little messier than usual! im pretty proud of it though :]

>>7622948
>That one is a bit harder to rate. There's a lot of good in there and also a lot of bad.
Thanks, do you have any tips on how to get rid of the bad? That drawing was from like a month ago but I always feel like there's something 'missing' with my digital drawings and I can never place what.

>>7623185
nta. i think you need to define the silhouettes better and add a light source. could be this direct sun light or perhaps a magenta rim light from the left. just whatever serves the piece, doesn't have to be super realistic

if you want a real understanding of where your art is, just go join a popular art server and pyw. Make sure it’s one large enough where people are routinely posted over with zero acknowledgement. If you get zero (you)s you're beg. If people ping you to suck your dick you’re int+.

>>7623354
where do you find them

>>7623277
Wow, I agree that looks a lot better. Thank you for the feedback, I'm definitely taking note of that and will apply it from now on.

Am I pro yet bros

7623363
You

Last couple semi-finished works

>>7623363
high int you need to work on your lighthing.

>>7624593

>>7624595

I draw fur slop

>>7619933 (OP)

>>7624529
Really good. You understand perspective. I would love if this is from imagination
>>7624593
reminds me of the stuff I drew back when I did graffiti
>>7624618
I hate you
>>7625411
Love this. Minimal, easy to read, easy to distinguish. Keep it up

>>7625411
beg
>>7624618
also beg
>>7624596
maybe high beg
>>7624595
kino
>>7624529
bretty gud but cool it with the fisheye

>>7624593
>>7624595
>>7624596
Int
Ever read any Jeffrey Brown? Your work reminds me a little of his.

>>7625426
No but I now have new name to look up

>>7625422
But why do you hate me?

>>7625559
You remind me of south koreans with their aggressively "different" styles, mixing cartoon and anime to avoid being associated with the Japanese...

It’s definitely more interesting than average popular art, but when everyone does the same kind of “different” it starts to feel a bit cliche.

>>7619933 (OP)

>>7625895
/pro/ and probably sold three commissions

Most recent thing I did, i was really proud of this one, acrylic paint and coloured pencil combo with airbrush for the shadow.

>>7627428
Noice!

>>7625638
It's not personal, as far as I know, I just hate all furries

>>7627428
Really cool

>>7619933 (OP)

Made this today. It was supposed to be just a sketch, but it changed to metaphor fanart.
About to leave for the store now.

>>7625559
Low int

>>7625895
High beg

>>7627428
Mid int

>>7620037
Really good faces but a bit of symbol drawing. Study some faces from life and darken your darks

>>7620070
Mid int. Beautiful work

>>7620177
Low int. Nice style

>>7620160
Low int

>>7620483
High beg. Work on form, colors, and anatomy

>>7620037
>>7620038
High beg

>>7627450
Thats fair enough. But what's your rating?

>>7627587
Toes the line between low and mid beg to me. I'm always more generous with rating for trad work though. You're trying to draw a more difficult angle. A for effort, but it doesn't look great. I'm sure you could be better with flatter angles

>>7627626
Im pretty shit at them as well ngl

>>7627553
High beg, id give you pro if you drew hulkenberg
>>7627538
low int
>>7627428
mid int
>>7625895
mid beg
>>7625653
low int

I'm new to doing full comic pages. How's my paneling?

>>7628725
Bad. Cramped as fuck. Text too big. Too much going on in a panel. Can't read this shit even if I wanted to (I don't)

>>7628725
Lame, fake and gay

>>7628725
You really need to read scott mccloud books about paneling. You also need to read up on dialogue and story writing.

Just ignore the one out of perspective line on the ground in the back

>>7630760
That hand is a crime
Eyes look AI but the rest of it is too shitty to be AI

>>7620695
love ur style

>>7630760
Kraut-chan, the other guy is right about the hand. It's no goodu.
My tomboys must have better hands

please lmk

>>7632920
mid beg
>>7630760
maybe high beg if not heavily reference, but definitely /seek/therapy
>>7628725
not sure if real anon
>>7627749
mid beg
>>7627553
somewhere in beg, probably not yet mid beg
>>7627538
high/doodle/
>>7627428
low int

>>7632923
your standards are retarded

Is this good I've been shitting out a lot of it lately

>>7630612
low/int/
>>7632920
high/beg/
>>7632923
pre/beg/
>>7633082
pre/adv/
>>7633945
pre/int/

>>7633949
I'm the last guy, what do you think I need to improve just out of curiosity

>>7633956
Nothing Mr.Todd McFarlane Sir, I just think you're capable of drawing better characters.

>>7633960
I don't know who that is
Better in what way
Sorry am I being rude

>>7633962
Study how to do a quick google search and get back to me. Sorry if I am being rude.

>>7633960
that looks nothing like his characters

why would anyone ever need this

>>7632923

>not sure if real anon

what's that supposed to mean

>>7619933 (OP)
Guise how do i draw better anatony and not make it seem stiff? Loomis didn't really help I know there was this other artist who drew anatomy by shapes but idk his name, pls halp

>>7634583
> how do i do this how do i do that
This is not the pre/beg/ thread pal but anyway, the left-hand shoulder should be bent a little because of the position of the arm impacting the torso, but it's stuck in position.
Looks good all and all but a bit too blocky.
tl;dr you're not feeling the form. Circular forms are simply just not present, completely absent aside from the coomer trap bewbs.

k how 'bout a non-comic

>>7634880
kek based I rate it as a mid/int/

Here you go.

>>7637789
Love it, but I can really only rate figure drawings.

>>7637789
/beg ross/

The foreground is alright stylistically, but it really falls apart with any scrutiny.

Part 1

>>7619967
low to mid int, great understanding of form
>>7620022
high beg, focus on proportions and think about starting value studies
>>7620070
high beg, try blocking in values before progressing with the painting
>>7620177
high beg, work on your linework

>>7640007

Part 2

>>7620483
high beg, kudos for finishing a piece though, lighting is too muddy, define a clear light source, also, the composition is messy, the focal point should be the action yet we're being distracted with the city scape in the background. Check out Creative Illustration by Andrew Loomis
>>7620501
low int, work on anatomy asap
>>7620551
high beg, the foreshortening on her leg makes her look like she's about to fall on me, yet the composition implies she's far back from the camera. Work on placing the figure in 3D space
>>7620642
really dig the style. Could def make money out of it so high int

>>7640011
Part 3

>>7620683
mid int. I see the vision but you're not there yet
>>7620695
high beg, work on your lines
>>7620806
high beg, a bit more face studies and you'll be in int
>>7620894
pro, do this in marker and I'll put it on my wall

>>7640017
Part 4

>>7620695
high beg, work on your lines
>>7620806
high beg, a bit more face studies and you'll be in int
>>7620894
pro, do this in marker and I'll put it on my wall
>>7621435
mid beg, needs more value variation, thumbnail looks like a black square

>>7640021
Part 5

>>7621951
low int, what the other anon said
>>7622125
high beg, study the plains of the face some more
>>7622273
somewhere in int, hard to tell from just a sketch
>>7622564
mid/high beg, bad line quality and different rendering types are really pulling this back

>>7640023
Part 6

>>7624529
low int, push the values more
>>7625559
mid int, I really dig the style
>>7625653
low int, you're on the right path. Now, pick an artist you look up to and learn from them
>>7627749
mid beg, work on constructing the body

>>7640026
>>7628725
looks fine, I like the pacing.
>>7632920
low to mid int, hard to tell. Rendering looks nice though
>>7633082
low int. Cool that you did a full piece but you need to work on your composition. The background is drawing too much attention from your characters

As a side note, FUCK this retarded website. The reason I'm wasting my time posting the replies separately
>Error: Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again.
I'll reformat your ass you fucking bitch!

Rate it

>>7640029
I think you might be retarded

>>7640241
mid/high beg, check out Proko's boob video
>>7640246
That's a given, I'm spending time here after all, but, what's more retarded is this site's cryptic spam policies

>>7640011
>Work on placing the figure in 3D space
I don't really use 3D models. Mostly some references and imagination. That particular work was mostly imagination with the exception of clothes.

But yea I get what you mean, more perspective

>>7635083
nigga

Ratings would be more accurate if people wrote if they copied a reference or were relying on their previous studies.

>>7640709
I'm not referring to 3D as in using a 3D model but rather to visualize how the character is positioned in 3d space. For instance, in your first image it looks like the girl is doing a lunge.

It's just one guy in here going
>Seeds feeds seeds
on every drawing posted. These threads are horrible

>>7640007
Mid int bordering on high int. Solid understanding of anatomy and form. Great lines amazing rendering. Gesture and the design of that guy’s face are the main things holding you back from a definite high int rating. Post more faces and girls.

also blog??

i am >>7619967 thank you for your rating.

little rusty but i need the temperature check rn

>>7641330
Please be a self-portrait

>>7640791
Oh I see, well yea you're right

I've been painting since I was a kid, but I'm trying a new style, how's this self portrait look?

Rate pls

>>7641875
Wasn't this a study? And from like months ago?

How am I doing? started 5 months ago, using a screenless tablet atm and drawing mainly from my imagination so the poses are kinda funky. She's supposed to be the same character

These are my digital ones made in photoshop with a mouse

and these are my ball pen ones (and a digital)

>>7641916
A rework. Power Level threads vary wildly in terms of how they rate things, so I like dropping an "anchor" to every now and again to calibrate myself against the room, so to speak. Plus, I haven't been back since 4chan went down, so I thought it would make sense to see if the makeup of the board changed.

>>7642143
Fair enough. It's good, I don't like the shadows, but they do stay true to the serial style.
I always rate trad things high. Honestly it could go either way, but I'll just say high beg.

Pic related is my work, which I also consider high beg, for comparison.

>>7642158
>Pic related is my work, which I also consider high beg
I'd give it low int, myself. It reads well in both the thumbnail and larger (I'm always a little disappointed when the thumbnail looks cool but the full size doesn't deliver). The lines are clean and the graphic style is well executed.

>>7641995
You need a lot of practice, but I think head construction should be your #1 priority. Low beg, but I think you show promise by willing to draw hands, feet and the like

>>7641557
Blessed schizo don't you ever take your meds

>>7642166
For real low beg, man, I thought I would be mid beg by now. Though you're right, it has only been a couple of months of practice.
Opinions from a low beg:
>>7641954
mid beg
>>7641875
low int
>>7641330
high beg
>>7640241
low beg

just lemme post this chan.

>>7642182
bro this site sucks, even after attaching images and removing half my ratings the post wont post

other ratings:

>>7640709
low beg
>>7640007
mid beg
>>7637789
low int
>>7634880
low beg

>>7642182
Just my opinion, because nothing looks uniform. The hands looks like you just flipped them, so I don't count that, but your shoulders, knees? They are all different sizes. I think if you could clean that up, mid beg for sure.
Good line weight though. That's something even high begs have trouble with.

>>7642182
thanks for rating my shit OC character, here's a colored up close and first time coloring something.

>>7640791
lil guy with his lil kicks very cute

>>7642182
I wish there was a -1 Tier to rate this

Recent sketchbook filling

>>7642708
Aint seen you in a minute. Low int despite this horrible quality.

>>7641014
Don't mention it. I feel like people here don't realize how hard it is to rotate a character while keeping the proportions consistent. I don't have a blog but here's a girl.
>>7641330
high beg. Check out the Sinix' beginner digital painting video.
>>7641875
If what that other anon is saying about this being a study, then this is a mid beg. The handle of the razor makes a really ugly tangent with the man's neck, always try to avoid tangents.

>>7643469
Part 2 cuz 4chan's busted for some reason

>>7641954
low/mid beg, You're having some trouble placing things in 3D space. Peter Han has a video on that I think so does Proko. Also, [spoiler]DAB[/notspoiler] but do that at your own risk.
>>7641995
low beg. same as above
>>7642158
high beg/low int. Adding larger spaces of uninterrupted black can really push this illustration, at the moment, details like the bullets take away from readability. Check out Mike Mignola
>>7642190
adv, no advice to give

how do I paint like this?

>>7643500
basic cel shading, add a bit of color burn in the transition between shadow and light, green rimlights on the left, teal rimlights on the right.

>>7619933 (OP)

i'm a 3DCG fag mostly but i think i fluctuate between 0 and 2.5 personally. blender really sucks the life out of me so i really only do it on days where i'm both refreshed, mentally happy, and have a lot of time to do nothing else, which happens maybe once per week.

right now i'm stuck at trying to get walk cycles to look more natural from the waist up. but i do know how to make a walk cycle, if a bad one even. i'm way ahead of where i used to be. i really need to look online to see how hands and arms are supposed to move when walking.

>>7643500
>lasso
>hard round
>play with layer magic

>>7619933 (OP)
Self-admitted, complete, dead-straight /beg/. Second drawing ever using a drawing tablet trying to get into this stuff.

Where have I landed?

>>7644399
Right where you said. It isn't prebeg, so you've got that going. Grind hands, don't hide them

what's the point of these threads? I really don't get it

>>7620501
What does true beg even means.

>>7645257
validation

>>7645355
how can you get validation if most are /beg/s

>>7645358
they're delusional

>>7645355
Fun, you can always see people get underrated by anons with the most unappealing artwork possible themselves. Also historically these threads often get derailed into some petty drama.

>>7645247
low /beg/. Dont waste time painting and grind more anatomy.

>>7645370
not him, but how is that low beg? I hate the content, but the anatomy looks fine

>>7640709
Ascended grandmaster of impeccable tastes tier

>>7645555
wasted quads

>>7620806
>>7621753
>>7627553
>>7630612
Blog?

>>7645370
That is not low beg. It's mid beg. Do you guys even take the image in OP into account when rating others or are you just trying to demoralize people? Oh, I forgot. This is /ic/. Of course it's the latter.

>>7619933 (OP)
The blind rating the blind the thread.
You absolutely deserve each other kek.

>>7645257
I post in here because I want to be called an int. But after being called a low beg so many times and seeing how you can still have appealing art even as a beg I'm really close to stop caring about it.

>>7645257
fun
>>7645766
it's not demoralization if you get told you can get even better

>>7645766
>Do you guys even take the image in OP into account
That's not the issue, the issue is that the people rating others in here are begs that have no idea how to rate artistic skills.
Just the fact that most of these morons use the word souls tells you everything you need to know about their intellect.

>>7645766
>Do you guys even take the image in OP into account
That's not the issue, the issue is that the people rating others in here are begs that have no idea how to rate artistic skills.
Just the fact that most of these morons use the word soul in order to describe art, tells you everything you need to know about their expertise and intellect.

>>7645875
What are your correct ratings? Quote them so that we know how to properly rate in the future.

>>7645879
It doesn't matter. Threads like these are pointless. Someone's success tells their true skills.

>>7645892
Success is not the same as technical skill is not the same as visual appeal

>>7645937
Of course not. I never implied that. All the stuff you mentioned are particular skills though.

>>7645980
How would you rate the people in the thread?

>>7646000
I wouldn't. My personal opinion is just that, a meaningless opinion. The only opinion that really matters is the collective one coming from a fanbase or your clients.

what are examples of /adv/ or /pro/ artists?

>>7646071
this anon obiously > >>7619939

>>7645257
It's always good for people to have a reality check. It's also cool to see anons level up. People that you recognize as pre beg from a while ago, actually improve their art. Some stagnate

>>7646071
Yeah, there are only a few here:
These guys are
>>7620642
>>7621753
This guy will be eventually
>>7624529

>>7646148
and this guy is proof that these threads are the definition of
blind leading the blind.

>>7641954
Seems highbeg or low int imo, I don't know why the others responded lower. You have flawless anatomy but need to work on line-art.

>>7646651
/pro/ and draws the crowds and gets the critics foaming at their mouths

>>7646168
If you're gonna act like you know what you're talking about, at least back it up.

>>7645370
I was expecting mid-/beg/ at least, but fair enough.

>>7646691
You are, bro. It's the content that people are really rating you on, and honestly I would have done the same.
You are mid beg, you're just gross and people dont like you.

>>7646651
Prodigy. Only seething crabs will disagree.

>>7646763
I've had people tell me my art is so ugly they feel assaulted from having to look at it. It seems I was born with negative appeal. I think the only way to break the curse is to steal the artstyle of someone with appeal. I'd need to do a lot of copying and analyzing, which would take time, but I want to develop decent fundies first, so I'll be wandering as a cursed soul for quite a while.

>>7646763
I don't think it's the content. It's more the way he painted it. >>7646691 This one looks way better.

>>7646071
so permabegs can rate your work (they have no idea about art)

>>7646837
Proven AI tracer.
Are you samefagging or just very bad at arting?

>>7646656
Anyone with functional eyes and at least some experience with drawing can see what I'm talking about.
You are exposing yourself as a beg.

>>7647076
case and point

>>7647079
That's what I thought, retard.

>>7647139
Wait, how do you want me to back it up exactly?
Mine is also an opinion, just like his is.
That's my entire point lol. These ratings are completely irrelevant, you 30 IQ monkey.

>>7619933 (OP)
I'm thinking of making prints for this drawing

I havent drawn in like a month so heres a random assortment of things.

>>7633945
Nobody thought this was AI, right? It's not that good?

>>7648116
>>7648112
mid beg but high effort.

>>7646999
Your realism is low beg but your anime girl here is mid beg

>>7646691
>>7646651
/pro/

>>7650363

The anime girl is meant to be in the mid beg bit as the example. it's obviously not pro. >>7646691

I'm so done with you guys, peace out crabby crabs

>>7650335
Mid int. With a bit more work and polish (years) top left could look like an mtg card art
>>7648116
mig beg
>>7648112
mid beg
>>7648105
mid beg
>>7646999
These could be high beg if the effort was consistent and the drawings were finished