How to draw this guy in a more cartoon style?

>>7649562 (OP)
Draw over it I heard it was really easy

>>7649562 (OP)

Don't draw real people. He didn't consent to that and I don't want to get sued.

>>7649665
nice

>>7649665
Cool

No.

>>7649665
I will now read your webcomic about a sarcastic guy showing off how much more intelligent he is then everyone else

>>7650675
eh?

>>7649562 (OP)
Something like this?

No.

>>7650565
>>7651945
Are you OP trying to get free work, autistic, or both?

>>7652052
Not really

>>7649665
Excellent

>>7652180
>>7649665
Splendid

>>7649665
blog kudasai

>>7652559
It's 99.9% NSFW akin to
>>7649892
>>7649813
>>7650202
I'm not sure you're looking for that lol.

>>7649665
Draw him taking deer dick

>>7652619
You should try painting straight away, you have the skills for it.

>>7652619
I am. Blog nao

>>7649562 (OP)

>>7649665
is your dream to be a greeting card maker?

>>7652619
you're being trolled bro how new are you? nobody wants your low /int/ blog and we all know you won't post it anyways lol you need to go back

>>7652619
>>>/beg/

>>7650864
erm.... no.

>>7653001
>>7653074
What is it about AI that you can recognize it from a mile away?
Too derivative?

>>7653040
Not really, my dream was to make it as an artist, which I did. I draw what my clients request.

>>7653048
>you're being trolled
That's why I didn't drop the ball. I gain nothing from posting by blog, except for hate from random 4chin psychos.

>>7653156
It's not ai, they are just incredibly simple and easy styles to make in about 10 minutes or less.

>>7653168
BULL.
SHIT.

Kill yourself AI Pajeet. No one is ever going to be fooled by the most obvious bait imaginable.

>>7653168
Why the random color choices then?

>>7653168
Fuck off AIfag

>>7653173
Imitating the annoying 2010s bright for no reason style and the 70s muted desaturated colors.

>>7653172
>It has a background and isn't scribbly beginner-tier! Must be AI!!!!!

>>7653156
and if you were not a complete fucking moron you would recognize the very obvious brush strokes that artist is not even trying to hide or fix up

>>7653176
>>It has a background and isn't scribbly beginner-tier! Must be AI!!!!!
You were told already why it's suspicious. The styles are very derivative from Adventure Time and old Hannah Barbera cartoons. Way too derivative.

>>7653001
>>7653074
*AHEM*

...now, what is it about AI art that you can recognize it from a mile away? The fact that it's FUCKING OBVIOUS AI PAJEETS ARE STICKING AISLOP IN THIS THREAD?

>>7653186
Maybe that was the point?

>>7653190
The point is to whip up some aislop and pass it off as a drawing, because that's what happened.

>>7653190
Not when it's a 1:1 style copy.

>>7653194
I think you might be autistic.

Making a joke out of it by copying a style closely was the whole point behind the pics moron.

>>7653191
It's not AI.
For one, the background is the same on both, and is directly using a layered brush that can be easily identified. AI sucks at doing any kind of stamped patterns or stepped brush strokes.
For the other, there's no weird warping near extreme corners of the lines, with no signs of weird softening or transitions.
There's also a couple of spots where the colors slightly out of line, an error you'd only really see a person do when trying to get things done fast.

I don't get how you see it being AI. it takes barely any effort to tell the difference.

>>7653200
>>7653203
Pajeet pajoot adubba dabba babu go fuck yourself AI fag.

>>7653203
Hi AI fag,
Firstly kill yourself
Second, this is not the AI thread so you kinda need to fuck off now.
Third, no one is laughing at your little """"joke"""" here at all
Fourth, nice ass covering, we are all totally convinced 100%

>>7653206
you're actually just not reading anything. okay buddy.

>>7653203
You mean like how AI consistently makes line and color errors while matching up a cartoon style 1:1 in a way that no human does?

>>7653200
Sure thing Rajesh.

>>7653210
You're actually doing a real shit job of lying to everyone.

>>7653210
you're actually just not telling the truth

>>7653219
>>7653216
dog stop posting so much. just because you paid for the pass to post rapid-fire doesn't make you funny.

>>7653223
Maybe try Ghibli style next?

>>7653215
kek, it's so satisfying that they can't get away with it anymore.

>>7653215
weird when I do it, it tells me the exact opposite.

Silence of the Holy Cows.

>>7653223
>S-stop making fun of meeeee!!!!!!!
Grow up or fuck off Habib.

>>7653244
No idea, I used the 1st free online AI scanner app I found. Maybe it's not as good as the one you used, or the other way around?

>>7653250
Okay like, why exactly does it have to be a pajeet? Where is that coming from?
I'm also not the guy that did those pictures, you've got this a bit twisted in your head I think. Perhaps you need to just... calm down a bit? there's only so much (you)-posting one can handle.

>>7653262
It's a common thing around here. It's a slur for indian people. Just like faggot or nigger are thrown around just to ragebait people.
The idea is that people that use AI are scammers, and since indians have the bad reputation of working in scam call centers, automatically whoever uses AI around here is considered a pajeet.

>>7653244
Photoshop is fun isn't it

>>7653268
Nah, you can verify it yourself. I'm nta btw, I posted this >>7653215
He's right, Was it AI gives a negative result for both pics.
I used decopy.ai

Is this type of schizo bait common on /ic/?

>>7653282
this whole thread is a hot mess. be more specific or get added to the pile of baiters.

>>7653290
>Some anon just wanted to add a joke about drawing someone in a cartoon style.
>Turns into a weird AI/not AI debate.
What the fuck people....

>>7653292
Don't use AI on a fucking art board when you want to make jokes next time Rajeesh. you would have to be really incredibly goddamn fucking stupid to want to try that and think it's funny. Really pants on head retarded.

>>7653292
>>7653282
Yes, it's very common. Are you new around here?

>>7653298
I think this post explained it pretty well >>7653203
You are trolling and/or don't know enough about AI or drawing. And the argument about copying styles is fucking stupid, AI didn't invent style immitation, it's perfect for OP's request.
>>7653307
I check it out sometimes, but I don't think I've seen this level of samefagging here before.

>>7653313
>AI didn't invent style immitation
It DID invent 1:1 perfect style imitation which is what we got above. Also it was proven to be AI generated like two hours ago. Quit trying to deepfake already faggot. At this point you are spamming for the sake of spamming so fuck off.

This place used to be so much more fun and helpful of a resource before street shitters started showing up and spreading AI slop in every single thread for no reason whatsoever.

>>7653313
>I check it out sometimes, but I don't think I've seen this level of samefagging here before.
Yep, I'm not here all the time and I noticed the same thing. I used to be here regularly in the past nad it was never this bad.
It might have to do with AI paranoia and people losing trust in the community in general. Dunno, just a wild guess.

>>7653315
Pretty low effort bait, but you got a laugh out of me.
>At this point you are spamming for the sake of spamming so fuck off.
kek, the irony

>>7653001
>>7653074
Did you really just come in here and drop some ai slop[?

There was some dipshit in another thread where someone asked about pixel art and the person unironically said to not study the medium.

And I was like
Really wanting to respond with actual advice because I do that as my job, but I knew if I did the thread would get swamped with one person having an argument with themself and flooding it until no real conversation can be had.

That's what this thread is. That's all that's happening.

Anyway :gas: thread.

>>7649562 (OP)
Whelp, I was going to add a drawing but then I read some more of this thread. And you guys are a bunch of faggots.

>>7653772
Oh no, we certainly missed the opportunity to see history in the making.
Fucking kek.

>>7653320
This

>>7652619
I still want it doko

I WILL have a go at redhead boy. Too much text itt.
Consider drawing.

>>7653946
>consider drawing
>can't resist posting instead of drawing
you certainly showed them

>>7653313
Oh fuck off Rajeesh, it's fucking obvious to everyone on the first glance, and every single AI detector that they are fucking AI pics. You know goddamn well no one wants that shit in here and it would ONLY piss people off and have them getting mad at you for derailing a draw thread by posting AI slop.

>>7654191
Hey Anon,

I totally get where you're coming from, and I can see how AI-generated images might seem a bit unsettling at first. There's a lot of hype surrounding it, and it’s a totally new concept to wrap our heads around. But I don’t think AI-generated art is quite as bad as you’re making it out to be.

For one, AI is still very much a tool, not a replacement for human creativity. Artists can use it as a way to amplify their own ideas, to experiment with styles, or to bring concepts to life faster. The process of working with AI often still requires a lot of input and creativity from the person behind it. It's a new medium, like photography or digital painting was when those first emerged.

Also, the technology behind it isn’t inherently bad—it can actually open doors to new possibilities for creativity, from designers to illustrators to game developers. People are already using AI to create incredible, surreal landscapes, portraits, and illustrations that would have been hard to even imagine before. It’s about how we choose to use it.

I also think it’s important to note that AI-generated art doesn’t take away from the value of traditional art. Both forms can coexist, and both can have their own place in the creative world. There are still people out there creating beautiful pieces by hand, and that craftsmanship is something that AI can’t replicate—at least not in the same way a person can.

In the end, it’s all about perspective. AI art is still evolving, and who knows where it will go in the future? But for now, it’s another tool in the creative toolbox. It’s up to us how we choose to use it.

>>7654226
source your quotes

also :gas:

>>7654226
You won't get very far with your AI apologetics here. /ic/ regulars are here because they want to learn to draw, not to prompt.
Try /g/.

>>7654226
...you are in a FUCKING DRAW THREAD Khumar, have some self awareness of where the fuck you are and what the fuck you are doing. It is only derailing a convo with shit absolutely no one in here cares about or wants to see.

>falling for AI generated ragebait

>>7654901
Nice.

>>7653315
Lol it's not "1:1" at all. Are you genuinely retarded?

>>7655370
It's too perfect to be done by a human claiming to have spent 10 minutes on them.
Which has been proven here: >>7653215

>>7654888
Geg, they do it every time!

>>7655429
Thanks for confirming our position that AI and trolls are garbage.

>>7655429
you need a rage response in order for your bait to be ragebait. try harder.

>>7655388
If you think minimalist calarts shit or 70s Hanna Barbera is "too perfect" and too difficult to make in 10 minutes or less then you are definitely not going to make it.
Maybe you need to go find another hobby since the simplest of all overly simplified cartoons that were designed to be insanely quick and easy for anyone to draw a few hundred to thousand times is too much for you.

These things might not be the silver bullet some anons are pretending them to be

>>7655725
Excuse me SAAR but would you kindly fuck right off with the AI slop in this Draw Thread.

Can someone actually try drawing him instead of ragebaiting each other

>>7655729
>If you think minimalist calarts shit or 70s Hanna Barbera is "too perfect" and too difficult to make in 10 minutes or less then you are definitely not going to make it.
I draw for a living, which is my definition of making it.
This is me btw: >>7649665
Now you have some substance to shit on. Go ahead bait boy.

>>7654901
>>7655725
Good stuff.

>>7655797
>Trust me bro! I'm totally a rich successful gazillionaire and I only post on mongolian basketweaving forums for fun!

>>7655800
That's funny, when I look it up it says you're full of shit.

>>7655823
If you are pursuing an art carreer to become rich, I have very bad news for you anon.

>>7655832
Sure thing buddy. Anyone can test it for themselves and see who of us is covered in shit on some indian sidewalk.
https://decopy.ai
Go ahead anons.

I thought you AI bros were the smart ones lol.

>>7653168
I think it's funny how nobody noticed that the background remained exactly the same between both images, and then the color layers were turned off and both lineart layers were left on, buuuuut so was the background light blue snow brush. The flat blue-gray background was also turned off but the light snow was left on too. But we're just going to keep on pretending that it was all AI all along and ignore everything everyone says anyway huh.

Because drawing something that was intended by design to be very easy to quickly draw for inbetweens all day long is actually way too hard for a normal human to recreate. That needs machines.

>>7655841
Nope, I'm just going to ignore what YOU say Rajeet. Time to go shit all over someone else's street because no one is going to believe a single fucking thing you say here.

>>7655841
Your arguments are very sound, but I can rebut them by saying anon could have generated them on a white void and then simply pasted them on the same pre-made background.
Same goes for the line art. It could be generated separately and then used again for colors.

I feel you are just the same shitposter doing damage control.
But tbf this is not a hill I would die on. Maybe the AI detection tools aren't working, which I highly doubt as they never let me down so far.

>>7655388
you really don't think someone just happens to know and do a style well enough to be able to doodle it out with one layer of flat color? It has to be AI only?

>>7655848
Best one in the thread so far. Pls post the original.

>>7655849
i think the difference is, one detector said they were fake while 4 others said it was real. But we are going to stick to the one that gave the answer we want to hear really really super badly and ignore everything else including the posted lineart, and background. We're sticking to the narrative we really super want to hear over any other noise,.

>>7655853

>>7655852
Not really. I prefer to use AI detection tools. It's very hard for me to say if that was created using AI or by a highly talented artist. Since this place isn't really brimming with highly talented people, I was suspicious and run them through an AI detection tool.

>>7655841
I think it's funny how you keep street shitting in this thread long LONG after everyone else immediately saw through your bullshit and told you to fuck off. But here you are, still here, still lying, still trying to desperately convince anyone you fucking can that you can do art when you post obvious to anyone here AI fake slop[. A day later you are STILL HERE trying to convince people you totally drew that.

goddamn pajeet street shitniggers never fucking quit

>>7655855
No need to be snarky, you aren't taking the high ground by doing that.
Are you the person that drew them? Why are you so defensive?

>>7655852
Correct, I don't

You want to know why? Because it's fake slop. It is very very completely totally unequivocally AI slop to any artist with an eye for such things. you come into a draw thread and post VERY OBVIOUS FAKE AI SLOP and you will be rightly called out for it by everyone here.

>>7655873
Huh? This whole thread is filled with people hurling insults and slurs as much as possible and this is the guy we are saying to stop being so snarky about it?

>>7655849
What you are suggesting takes more effort to keep the deepfake alive (for a couple days no less) than to just draw the damn thing and switch layers on and off.
I think people around here are jumping to Apollo 20 conspiracy theory levels of tinfoil hattery now.

>>7655880
I was replying to somebody that quoted me directly. Are you samefagging now, or what exactly is your problem?

>>7653001
Any asshole that thinks for a second that this cannot be done in 10 minutes and claims that it simply must be AI is not going to make it.

>>7655890
To me the fact that the original author of the drawings in question hasn't addressed the situation at all, besides posting that lineart, speaks volumes.
Instead there's """a bunch""" of anons defending """him""".
Let's see what happens if I do this.
>>7653001
>>7653074
>>7653168
Could you please post your blog or just a quick sketch so that we bring this discussion to rest?
It shouldn't be a problem for someone with your skills. I'd love to be proven wrong and see that these aren't AI generated.
Just a quick sketch but in either of these styles would be fantastic.
If you're using something that has a timelapse saving tool, that would be even better.
Love you, byeeee~

>>7655856
Love this lol. Saved.

I really hope it's not AI kek.

>>7655910
PYW.
Let me gues...

>>7655917
def not AI kek, i used mspaint specifically for the 1:1 pixels and flood-fill with imperfect coverage, I wanted to see if an image impossible for AI to generate would get detected as AI.
here's an earlier save for extra assurance.

>turn stabilization to 40%
>draw basic ass cartoon
>AI!!! TOO PERFECT!!!!
does that nigga even draw?

>>7655928
Christ, Calarts exists because it is really really super easy to do that any shaved ape can make something of substance out of it. Somehow it's the lost art of the gods around here.

This took me 13 minutes to make from sketch to finish

>>7655960
And it looks like shit, also nothing like the AI slop posted above so you failed to prove anything but the fact that you cannot draw.

>>7655960
oh anon... check your eyes for a serial number now!

>>7655960
Still fake ass shit Punjab.
Still fooling nobody.

>>7655960
fake. you just got your friend who is good at drawing to make that to cover for you.

>>7655960
>Midjourney draw me a twink faggot flipping people off
>Draw the same image again but lineart only
>Draw the same image again but brushed color layer only, leave gaps between the colors resembling quick brush strokes
>Draw the same image again but as a sketch layer with multiple lines outlining the figure in red
Dust over the last one with a soft eraser and
>Guys I made Art!!!!! Praise me SAAR!

>>7655960
This was not hand drawn and no one is going to believe you any longer.
People are not going to humor pathetic Rajeets trying to prove they are actual artists....

we're just pretending to be retarded itt right? anyone not pretending?

>>7655985
This is your defense Punjabi? Samefag and try to act like it's all joking around?

>>7656006
I'll think of a clever reply later when chatgpt is back online in my village

>>7655960
Thank fucking god. Hope in humanity and ic restored.
Thank you anon. What threw me off at the start was the super clean line-art. Are you using vectors for that? If not, then you have amazing line control.
Also, you might want to rethink using this style, cause AI detectors think you are AI. Just food for thought.

>>7655944
Nah, I believed you the first time. I freaking love this. It's just too funny looking but you still nailed the vibes and character of the original photo. You have all my praise.

>>7655975
At this point I think this is just trolls trolling trolls trolling... central.
I have no idea what to think anymore.

>>7655960
Guess again street shitter.

>>7656129
Are you seriously samefagging right now just to have someone somewhere not call you out?

>>7656129
How many times do people need to tell you to fuck off Ranjeesh? what are you getting out of this anyway? No one cared for your ai slop yesterday, no one cares for it today, everyone wants you to kill yourself already, why the fuck are you still here, still samefagging?

>>7653074
I just got here and all but this is....this is ai. I cannot think it is anything but ai.

>>7656340
>>7656358
Nope, it wasn't him.

>>7655960
Pajeet Pajoo yabba dabba do street shittter nigger. Fuck you.

>>7656304
You guys have to be REALLY careful with this program. It has a pretty nasty false positive rate. I think the original artist was posting AI definitely but try this one.

>>7656634
FUCK the timelapse file is too big

>>7656634
Didn't we prove that Calarts style was so difficult that ordinary human beings simply cannot recreate it? It's too perfect.

I'm amazed at how unbelievably angry this one extremely racist dude is at a thread of people having fun drawing a funny yearbook picture is.

>>7656644
You can resize it here: https://cloudconvert.com/mp4-to-webm

>>7656680
The only thing that is certainly proven is that some people have 0 originality and have to rely on copying other people's styles to the letter. Drawing or using AI has little to do with that.

>>7656936
I think some people are so incredibly angry about AI that they will jump on the first thing they kinda, sorta think might be AI and go attacking. And no evidence will convince them otherwise.

>>7656936
You don't think someone saw a thread about drawing someone as a cartoon, and drew them as different kinds of popular cartoons?

You guys lost your collective shit so fucking bad about screeching AI and slurs over and over again you totally lost the whole joke that anon was trying to make at the time.

...and really why is it just that damn hard to grasp the idea that someone might have tried drawing it, to the point of tinfoil hat level conspiracy nonsense at every explanation up to thinking they made about 10 more steps to have lineart made, and two levels of backgrounds made, just in case someone needed proof, and then even more proof after that since they never accepted the lineart explanation. Yeah cool one site said it was fake, then three more said it wasn't but no Fuck you we're only going to believe the one site that said it was fake and get back to slinging slurs.

>>7656944
it's clearly just one person. it's been the same posting style the whole time with this guy who knows like every indian slur under the sun. he needs a hobby.

>>7656944
I never once threw around a slur in this thread. You should probably stop thinking ic is only one crazy person talking to himself.

>>7656946
>>7656951
Oops, did you forget to quote yourself there, samefag?

>>7656984
Probably, yeah.

Can everyone draw more and yap less?

>>7657223
That went out the window when someone decided to spam AI trash and shitpost.

>>7657269
There was never AI in this thread. just a bunch of sloppy photoshops of the forbes tool from an extremely racist man.

Also lmao at trying to say that people calling your ass out are just one. It's been plainly obvious who is singular this whole time.

>>7657341
>Also lmao at trying to say that people calling your ass out are just one.
Who the fuck are you talking to, schizo?

>>7657364
:gas:

>>7657223
Who was drawing? All I see is AI slop and people bending over backwards to defend that shit.

>>7657223
I don't think anyone wants to put anything in this thread if you assholes are just going to go fucking crazy on them and scream ai conspiracy theories at them for a few days.

>>7657384
Are you blind?

>>7649562 (OP)
here

>>7657341
Liar liar
AI bros got to work shitting up this thread almost immediately. When called on it they resorted to stupid stunts, that were also exactly as obvious.

>>7657523
I see you woke up from your sleep.
:gas:

>>7653074
I don't know about you guys,
https://wasitai.com/
https://sightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images
both tell me this is not AI generated at all. Seems like the deepfake detectors are having some trouble making up their minds.

>>7657582
So don't use them.
I just solved your problem for you, lookit that.

>Oh hey a fun thread about drawing something in a cartoon style
>Draws something in a well known cartoon style
>Anons "What the fuck?!!? This is a wobbly scribble, that's AI!!!! GET him everyone!!!!
>Drawanon "No I drew it, here's my linearts
>Anons "Not enough!! PROVE to me it's not AI!!!!!
>Anons "I found a thing that tells me it's definitely 100% AI! Get him everyone!!!
>Drawanon "I got more tools that say it isn't, plus the backgrounds..."
>Anons "Don't fucking care, one tool said it's fake therefore it's fake!!! Get him everyone!
>Anons "Fuck you pajeet faggot! PROOOOOOVVVVEEEE to me it's not AI, Prove it! Imma still call you shit the entire time while you are doing it!!
>Drawanon "Here's another one in the same style made the same way and here are my stages."
>Anons FUCK YOU PAJEET! You just used AI to make the lineart layer, color layer, and sketch later!!! Get him everyone!!!!"
>Anons "PAJEET FAGGOT N*gger! Fuck you!!!"

I wonder why people don't like you guys....

>>7657675
>people don't like you guys
Good, fuck off newfag.

>>7657675
Calling suspected ai bros pajeets is so fucking funny too. Sorry guys we actually can't draw anything ever

>>7657675
Learn to ACTUALLY DRAW or get the fuck out of /ic/ Pajeet streetshitter. No one will give a fuck about your feelings.

>>7657675
>Waaaaaah why are all the artists making fun of my AI prompts?!

>>7657675
Holy fuck

Shameesh actually came back here to bitch about being rightly called out for his AI shittery

>>7657688
>>7657746
>>7657789
>>7657805
^ Retards proving his point ^

>>7657223
No

>>7658065
How do you pick out your values for irl markers? I got Ohuhu's markers but I got no clue to how to pick the right color... and when I do try to mix em its so off and terrible.

>>7658345
Aez

>>7658065
So good.

Someone draw him preggo

>>7653001
>>7653074
>Oh hey a fun challenge thread.
>AI slop.

Fuck, I'm out.

>>7649562 (OP)

>>7657675
Pack it in guys, we triggered Ramjeet after nobody fell for the obvious ai bait.

>>7658265
anon i'm just winging it, i buy the lightest blick studio markers i can find and go from there
>>7658629
ty

>>7653001
>>7653074
>>7655960
>all these ai jeets calling everything AI
Demoralization tactics 101. Make your opponents doubt everything until they have nothing to believe in. It's so obvious we are getting raided by some ai jeet discord. Mods don't give a shit about this place.

>>7657675
It's a raid. Just look at these replies. It doesn't look organic, it's some clueless outsiders trying to act like they belong here. Too much replies within just 1 hour too. Any other thread is dead compared to this activity. Either it's a group of ai jeets trying demoralization tactics or 1 AI schizo.

>>7659433
I have a new winner. New best of the thread for me.
I kneel.

>>7659433
Nice

>>7655914
>To me the fact that the original author of the drawings in question hasn't addressed the situation at all
I fucking hate you brain rotten tourists from social media. Nobody owes you any explanation, nobody has to "address" some mentally retarded monkeys buck broken by AI.

>>7660413
What the fuck is this witch hunt mentality of
>PROVE to me it's not AI!!!! While I consistently insult you and attack you the whole time!!!!
>Now prove it some more, and some more and more after that!!!!!
The fuck is wrong with you people? That anon did prove it at least three times and then came back with a new drawing and all you people just keep autistically screech AI Jeets at him any way.

can't draw
won't draw
posts [null]

>>7660730
>Shamash is triggered again!
Uh oh!

>>7655836
Nta but placebo joke tool
I pity those who take it seriously.

>>7661024
Also what fucking techbro thought this was a good idea?

AI isn't better than humans at drawing or anything at all, yet now some morons made an AI to detect AI and instead of using our own instincts and reason, we're supposed to believe that AI can do this job better than us and thus deal with the retards that take what the AI says as gospel.

The collective iq of all posts in this thread is down the shitter.

>>7661029
Again i have to ask, a single tool said it was AI, three more said it was not. Why is everyone sticking to the one that said fake and ignoring the others so strongly? What makes one AI detection tool more helpful than all others combined?

>>7661113
Crabs, or worse nodraws. If you didn't generate your images, just ignore and move on.

>>7661113
Because the first one was correct. You did not draw those pics and every single person in this thread is totally are of that fact.

>>7661113
We know goddamn well you generated that shit Rajeet. Fuck off already, it has been days of this stupid shit and you are not or ever will prove to anyone that you are anything but a no talent, no draw street shitter.

>>7657675
It's only one person doing this dawg. we already know that.

>>7661290
I was also telling the AI jeet to fuck off.

>>7661113
It's ai jeet demoralization raid. >>7661178 >>7661203 They accuse everyone of ai to make artists doubt everything. Just call out their tactics and tell them to fuck off.

Is it good ;-;

>>7661757
good Haley joel osment

>>7658265
>>7660104
Art tip: Write with each of your markers on a piece of paper to keep nearby to always be able to see what you need.
Advanced art tip: Don't leave the test paper in direct sunlight (like me) so it doesn't bleach out.

Like and subscribe for more useful art tips!

>>7661931
whoops, forgot picture

>>7655960
I like how sketch looks better then that finished piece of crap.

>>7655960
This is Still AI generated slop.

>>7649562 (OP)

>>7658065
Love it
>>7658345
Soul

>>7662971
Why he urple

>>7658065
good likeness

>>7662971
he looks wise. like that picture of the fat man sitting in a pond.

>>7663366
he takes colloidal silver for his health