thru my time on the internet i have came to the conclusion that somehow, art is tied to intellect. Art is simple to peak, but hard to master. reason why attract many different type of people.

Some, just love it, others hate it because of their own incompetence, walking manifestations of the dunning-krugger effect. people who claim their failure is somehow not their own and somehow inflicted to them by some deity joke, who made them not of an specific race, didnt gave them the power to do it or simply because they have a kink for degradation and prefer to say there are better people than themselves.

you cant be bad at art, since is something you should learn just by trial and error, just by repetition you should learn, thats literally one of the things that separete us from animals. What you have is a deficit in your cognitive ability, you cant percieve figures, you cant feel the form, you cant understand concepts simple as absence of light become shadows. something that likely plagues you in every aspect of your life.

TL;DR if you are bad at drawing, you probably struggle to put the spoon in your mouth, your only purpose is to blame others and try to pull them back in the bucket you were born to be

>>7658043 (OP)
>if you are bad at drawing, you probably struggle to put the spoon in your mouth
>probably
nice job softening your own argument, you jive turkey. also learn to write better.

>>7658043 (OP)
You're bad at making threads.

>>7658043 (OP)
>art is tied to intellect
this is very vague
>Art is simple to peak
unclear
>Some, just love it
no one "just loves" art; this is at best poorly expressed, and at worst simply wrong.
>others hate it because of their own incompetence
similar to the above
>people who claim their failure is somehow not their own and somehow inflicted to them by some deity joke, who made them not of an specific race, didnt gave them the power to do it or simply because they have a kink for degradation and prefer to say there are better people than themselves
esl x10
>you cant be bad at art, since is something you should learn just by trial and error, just by repetition you should learn
the capacity to learn through a certain means (repetition, trial and error) doesn't necessitate these things such things will yield results. if smart people use poor methods (even within trial and error and repetition), they will yield poor results.
>What you have is a deficit in your cognitive ability, you cant percieve figures, you cant feel the form, you cant understand concepts simple as absence of light become shadows
intellect isn't an all-encompassing thing. even those with multiple elite dimensions of intellect can be deficient in certain areas. also, as smart as some of the old masters were, their art(s) simply wasn't/weren't developed to the point where conventions which are "obvious" to many now were not yet discovered by even the best at the time.