Thread 7669367

Achieving the Retro style is not too hard you know

>>7669367 (OP)
Like how?

Prompt?

>>7670122
None, this was drawn for a thread at /co/ by someone who draws some nice fifis

>>7670407
so are you going to make me hunt this anon down to figure out his method?

>>7670471
>figure out his method?
The answer is Disney. The answer is always Disney.

Obviously. Furries have been doing it for 40 years.

>>7669367 (OP)
Is it a lineweight thing? Does this have no line variation? I can't fully tell but it looks like it doesn't to me.

>>7670471
>figure out his method
You retards always looking for "the secret" instead of just motherfucking practising what you want to draw.

>>7671136
nothing wrong with asking the one making it how he does it
it can help you to avoid focusing on the wrong shit during ur practice

>>7671150
>nothing wrong with asking the one making it how he does it
Yes there is, because the answer to how to draw anything is by fucking looking at it, studying it and practising. But ngmitards like you think it's about tracking down the secret formula, oh I have to find the hidden technique he's using!!!

It's a fucking purple disney skunk, not a new element.

>>7671162
>studying it and practising.
i agree. but there is nothing wrong with asking for pointers especially if the artist is right there
this is why people like you think "talent" exists
no we just had the wits to get us a solid mentor/teacher
this also has to do with networking as well which is why these people usually get bigger faster

>>7671162
It's Warner dummie

>>7670471
the method is that preston blair shit with the spheres.

>>7671457
you mean his book on animating film cartoons?

>>7671463
i think so?
john k is a waste of oxygen but he had a good archive of construction methods for cartoon animals, this is worth a browse
https://johnkcurriculum.blogspot.com/

>>7671495
whats wrong with john k?

>>7671965
Easier to ask what's not wrong with him. Dude's an egomantic sex pest, and while the industry is willing to deal with sex pests but he was so hard to work with he got shut out from the industry as a whole.

>>7671399
My guy this is just a coomified woman's body with a generic looney tunes skunk head and tail, painted purple.

>>7672086
Did you even watch Tiny Toons?

>>7672048
>lefty reply
so he's based?

>>7672136
No, he actually is a legit sexpest it seems, the problem is that one of his victims it's also an opportunistuc piece of shit who literally is behind a lot of uglyfication of female character designs in cartoons and it's also petty as hell.

Also a whole lot of the people involved in the "investigation" of the accusations are a bunch of bad faith leftoids.

>>7672136
Like I said, the industry would bear that. But no one likes a know it all braggart lazy piece of shit who talks down to everyone around him. He was driven out of the industry well before the sexpest shit became widely known

>>7672136
>being against rapists is leftist
you're genuinely retarded

>>7671168
not him but boilerplate practice rules apply to anything, break down the forms, visualise in 3d, trace if you need to, develop the muscle memory

>>7670471
>>7671150
It's MeXon. He has a twitter:
https://x.com/Mex0n37
Dunno why you guys have to behave like such smug bitches all the time instead of answering a basic question

>>7671965

Btw nobody who hates John K like this actually cares about the bad shit he has done as much as they are mad that he ripped apart their favorite baby shows.

>>7672733
That is so fake

>>7669367 (OP)
this style is so ugly and outdated why would you ever want to replicate it

>>7673179
Tastelet

each frame of dumb ass kids shows from the 90s was drawn 4 times over by multiple artists to near perfect lines and that pisses me off to no end

>>7673250
It's crazy how great a time that was to be even mildly creatively interested.

>>7671162
>>7671168
This is a bit different, because there are things at play beyond just "learn to draw it," that you might not notice right off the bat, like how the lines are a dark warm gray as opposed to just black, or, as is the case with getting a VHS screenshot look like in >>7671399, the application of filters.

>>7670458
Source? Looks just up my alley

>>7669367 (OP)
based

>>7669367 (OP)
Wait, that's not a screenshot?!