>>7678795
Pure projection. Maybe my analysis hit close to home.
If you're offended by it then that might point you in the right direction. Look inwards.
Most artists just want to be left alone and have their work be protected against the blatant missuse of intellectual property by the hands of these tech companies.
The prompter plays the role as the footsoldier doing the bidding of these corporations. Buying into a sales pitch meant to appeal to people just like yourself so that you rally their cause.
"Everything is just about increasing productivity and profit margins, human creativity is just pretentiousness, intellectual ownership is just entitlement, there is no value in human creativity, the artpigs are jealous and feel threathened by you and your epic prompts".
We see that this is all much bigger than you and I. And that by engaging in bickering amongst ourselves we end up playing right into their pawns while they take from us something much more valuable than a prompters percieved rights to reduce everything and everyone down to an object to be utilized for personal gain.
This is a power grab, it's a way for greedy capitalists to create a monopoly for themselves while pulling the ladder up from beneath them.
If anything the prompter is like the unaware fly that keeps landing on you when you're trying to consentrate. Persistent in their ignorance and inable to think outside of their collective thinktanks. Causing further confusion with their circular arguments while everyone else are too busy being conserned with solutions.
We have observed the bugman for years now..
Our tolerance for you people and your disingenuos nature ended a long time ago. I shouldn't have to remind you are the aggressor constantly claiming to be the victim everytime anyone calls out your spiteful/ ignorant rethoric.
The artist isn't the problem; megacorporations and their cult followers are.
You're right. I am punching down but for entirely different reasons than you claim.
