>>7698341
>>7698834
No need, because, again, you didnt read what i said. I draw all the thing, from zero, what's the difference if i use a 3d model to reference the pose? what about using a pose of a photo? what about if the same client present me a photo or drawing and say "i want that but with my characters"? what if i use photos of myself, or objects, or 3d on blender, or daz, or designdoll, or photobashing something, what if i photobash one thing to make another like a texture or pattern or if i use a image to copy the color combinations or light work, or if i just copy 1:1 a photo for a portrait like the norm for painters.
Is irrelevant, you are still making all yourself, the only difference for the client is time.
You could said "ah but you must state blabla on your info because reasons and that way no one is gonna buy your shit", but again, is irrelevant because is just a thing of pragmatisms, i do all the drawing.
Also is very curious how people know so little about the workflows you can make with diffusion models, because of the anon state about "slop"; you can still make all the drawing by yourself, use the diffussion model on your own style, that is yours, and you already developed, to render the thing and copy the reference, wich is in your style, what's the point if you can do that all by yourself? you are right, the result is the same, the difference, x2 time faster, for me? is doesnt matter, the drawing is still in the same style i developed, if i study more and change my style over time i just update the lora, so you have anon make the drawing, and anon making the drawing x2 faster, and is the same drawing, i wonder which one is better for the client...
Of course if you are a beg, diffuser models will never be useful for you because you still dont understand most of the art knowledge, that's why you see so much "ai slop", is people that dont know anything about art making shit, if you already know, not using it on your workflow is just retarded.
