Thread 213468625

Grand Theft Auto VI could be banned in the UK - the developers' own country of origin - due to the requirements of the new Online Safety Act, according to new reporting by the Telegraph.

>>213468625 (OP)
>due to the requirements of the new Online Safety Act
What are the requirements?

Good, nobody should have to play more movie slop

>>213468648
You need an Online Driving Loicense

based, give it 20 years and britain will be the only first world cunt that has functional young adults. now all that’s left is tiktok

>>213468692
oh yeah their youths are looking real functional

>>213468712
they WILL be. give it 20 years. i guarantee you their ADHD and autism rates drop below the rest of the first world

>>213468625 (OP)
Lucky for them, it's gonna stink.

>>213468648
You have to get a loicense for street violence m8, just like Ahmed does in real life. At least he has the decency of legally mugging and shanking pedestrians.

>>213468750
>tf talking about violence being legal
when i was biking in northeastern mexico i had a guy “jokingly” threaten to stab me with his machete

>>213468625 (OP)
Lowering the voting age was a monumental fuck up for labour

>>213468625 (OP)
GTA Online died overnight when they started using AI moderation, nobody says anything in the game chat anymore.

>>213468782
Menacing gringos with your rusty machete is a tale as old as lynching Chinese store owners

No way this happens. It's a British game and we're still one of the largest video game markets in the world. Our pozzed government will literally collapse before GTA VI is banned here. People (if you can call gamers people) will fucking riot.

>>213468917
why do random old drunk niggas walk around the countryside with donkeys and machetes anyway? i swear i saw this 10+ times in Coahuila alone

>>213468982
Traditional work tools

>>213468977
>It's a British game and we're still one of the largest video game markets in the world. Our pozzed government will literally collapse before GTA VI is banned here. People (if you can call gamers people) will fucking riot.
Why do you think Keir Starmer would give a single flying fuck about all that?

The political establishment in this country has always hated video games and seen them as "dangerous" because they allow escapism and potentially promote "problematic" ideas. And no party holds this view more strongly than Labour.

This government would gladly destroy the video game industry because they see it as an obstacle in the way of their goal of establishing total draconian control over the thoughts and lives of every British citizen.

Cynically, I'd also point out that the Labour government has many monetary ties with big tech companies like Meta, Google, Netflix etc, all of whom have little-to-no involvement in gaming. If they severely restrict or ban major video games, it means people are forced to spend more time scrolling Facebook or consuming Youtube/Netflix slop for entertainment.

>>213468625 (OP)
500 SEAT SUPERMAJORITY FOR REFORM DUE TO GTA IV BAN

>>213468648
Pledging that Muhammad (Pieces Be Upon Him) is the true messenger of Allah

>>213468625 (OP)
this country is so fucking cucked its unreal

>>213469101
Yeah but since like 10% of the british population has played gta V wouldn't they get upset? It would be like banning pubs.

>>213468625 (OP)
>lower the voting age to 16
>immediately afterwards stop under 18s from watching porn and playing video games
Are politicians competent in your country?

>>213468738
They won't even be first world in 20 years lol

>>213468625 (OP)
GTA is like one of UK's biggest cultural exports rn, what are they doing?

>>213471098
We aren't first world now.

>>213471149
there's nothing british about it. it's made an American company and most of the deverlopers are americans

>>213471098
They will be. Islam and sharia law will save UK from the claws of NATO, liberal democracy and capitalism

>>213471250
How do you not know that GTA is a British video game series? GTA 5 is probably the most famous game made in the UK.

The Labour Party are true subhumans.

>>213471379
depends what you consider to be the defining factor. rockstar is an american company, they have a dev house in scotland but most of the developers are americans. the owners are scottish but that hardly makes it a british game.

>>213468625 (OP)
UK säljer ut allt till USA.

No porn... No games... Damn, now is Britain the Korea of Europe?

>>213468977
>>213469101
Is Rockstar still meaningfully a british studio at this point? Not that I'd think it would influence PM Sir Keir Starmer's fundamentally retarded thinking.

>>213468738
In 20 years britain will be a brown majority brown shithole like all other brown countries lol

No magic soil
Brown people ruin societies
See: latin america

>>213471379
>>213471460
It's "owned" by Strauss Zelnick, I think. A good chunk of 6's devs are indian codemonkeys, which is why it leaked early.

>>213471169
>filename
bongpunk would be a pretty cool setting for a game imo.

>>213471584
You're mixing up Rockstar (An American Publisher) with Rockstar North (A British Developer)

you can tell it's a British game because leftists get very tame jokes about them while right wingers are depicted as inbred hicks who sell meth.

>>213471631
that's the holding company. the owners of the development company are scottish.

>>213471899
Well, Dan Hauser left so it's just his brother working on 6. I think.