>>213953224
I don't think you actually understood the chud shit properly in the first place. The crux of the matter is that race is a very real biological phenomenon, and with the genetic differences there's a preloaded group identity, and the races stratify at different levels. And because the races are different, cognitively different, and want society to function and operate in different ways, if they share a society there will be division and tension.
Like, I'm a chud and I actually agree with blacks in a sense when they complain about "institutional racism". Rape is much more acceptable in black africa, so when we hold them to white standards of behavior in regards to notions of consent, it's perceived as unfair to them. They like turning up to shit late, they like their churches having grifters, walking down the middle of the street, being able to fight if their honor is disrespected. So when white written laws punish them severely for this behavior, and their people disproportionately end up imprisoned, they see it as them being targeted.
>if you say all criminals regardless of race should be harshly punished and address specific issues things will improve.
Most blacks themselves don't want this, so they'll fight you trying to enforce that. If black areas got swamped with police and became safe, property prices would raise and the area would end up gentrified. They'd be priced out of living where they grew up, they'd have to live alongside other races (they don't want to). They wouldn't have guaranteed black elected officials. The standards of behavior of other races would be enforced, they'd in a sense lose territory. It makes perfect sense for them to vote democrat and to agitate for lax law enforcement for their ghettos.
Your ideology comes down to basically enforcing white standards of behavior, and as demographics further shift, you won't be able to do that. Then you'll finally understand when the boot is on the other foot.