>>214490202
>let's not try to turn this into all is le relative
No but categories are, trannies could be given some merit in that biological categories such as women are more often defined by function than by any tangible reality.
Women existed before we had gene testing. Why? Because there is a set of qualities with obvious tangible effects that can be discerned and assigned.
The more tangibke the effects, the more vakidated the cateogry becomes in reality
Where does a woman start? What is the "true X chromosome"
Many female animals have differen chrimosomes. And even in our females each one has different alelles and content.
Where can it stop being a sexual chromosome?
For purity you might go by phylogeny.
X descends from z and from z onwards i consider them to be a new group
If instead of amniotes you put the phylogenetic clade somrwhere before it could be as equally valid.
These are not real tangible material realities, just words to group some stuff
If you decided to group things not by origin but by color or by shape they could be equally valid, but less useful categorizations