← Home ← Back to /int/

Thread 214566567

17 posts 4 images /int/
Anonymous Japan No.214566567 >>214566591 >>214566714
What if India was a Buddhist country?
Anonymous United States No.214566591
>>214566567 (OP)
Look to Sri Lanka.
Anonymous United States No.214566623 >>214566632 >>214566757
would be the most advanced civilization on earth today unironically.
Anonymous Canada No.214566632
>>214566623
This
Anonymous United States No.214566646
What if Indians stayed in India?
Anonymous !!jV3SJHu2YOK Saudi Arabia No.214566666
what if zambia was a christian country?
Anonymous Mexico No.214566678 >>214566699
what if india was muslim
Anonymous United States No.214566699 >>214566786
>>214566678
Look at Pakistan
Anonymous Canada No.214566714
>>214566567 (OP)
Impossible, they're far too greedy to be Buddhists. Indians are the most materialistic people you'll ever meet, worse than the most nouveau-riche poseur Chinese.
Anonymous Japan No.214566757 >>214567160 >>214567208
>>214566623
Buddhism appears to be derived from the essence of ancient Indian cultural essence, but is there any reason why having Buddhism as the state religion would make India more 'civilized'?
Anonymous United States No.214566786
>>214566699
So nothing would change.
Anonymous United States No.214567160 >>214567267 >>214567307
>>214566757
>is there any reason why having Buddhism as the state religion would make India more 'civilized'?
buddhism was the first real approach at an enlightenment-type social movement, which is what directly propelled Europe towards scientific thinking and development.

Buddha was basically an atheist (or agnostic, possibly) that wanted ancient indian religion to stop sacrificing animals and doing strange blood rituals. At that time India was without a doubt the center of the world, there was a post here yesterday about how India was 50% of the world's population during the Buddha's time, how it was the scientific capital of the world, it was exporting culture across SEA and even as far as Greece, etc. I really do think that if buddhism had been embraced it could've fixed a lot of issues that india had, in history and honestly even today
Anonymous United States No.214567208
>>214566757
No Brahmins and no caste system, India instantly improves
Anonymous Japan No.214567267
>>214567160
If Buddhism had remained in India for a longer time, would it have become centered around Mahayana Buddhism?
Anonymous United States No.214567307
>>214567160
The Buddha was more of a religious reformer than someone trying to start a new religion. He was anti-ritualism, in part due to the fact that he had mixed ancestry - he was part tribal - and hence not completely in the Vedic fold. He emphasized a focus on inner spirituality, which was talked about in earlier Vedic philosophical texts, but had grown to become less important over time.
Buddhism did take off in India. But it didn't survive the Islamic invasions.
Anonymous Japan No.214567321 >>214567389
Or did the characteristics of Theravada remain strong, as in SEA?
Anonymous United States No.214567389
>>214567321
Buddhism, as a cultural force, is still incredibly strong in India. The Ashoka Chakra - the wheel on the Indian flag - was often used as a Buddhist symbol and Indian state seals use a lot of Buddhist iconography