>>214566757
>is there any reason why having Buddhism as the state religion would make India more 'civilized'?
buddhism was the first real approach at an enlightenment-type social movement, which is what directly propelled Europe towards scientific thinking and development.
Buddha was basically an atheist (or agnostic, possibly) that wanted ancient indian religion to stop sacrificing animals and doing strange blood rituals. At that time India was without a doubt the center of the world, there was a post here yesterday about how India was 50% of the world's population during the Buddha's time, how it was the scientific capital of the world, it was exporting culture across SEA and even as far as Greece, etc. I really do think that if buddhism had been embraced it could've fixed a lot of issues that india had, in history and honestly even today