> Korea 1950: nuclear stalemate 75 years later
> Vietnam 1975: flee Saigon embassy via helicopter
> Lebanon 1983: barracks bombed, pack up and leave
> Somalia 1993: Black Hawk Down, US lost
> Iraq 2003-2011: stayed 8+ years, achieved nothing
> Afghanistan 2001-2021: Taliban back in charge after 20 years, US lost
> Libya 2011: turns into failed state with slave markets, US lost
> Syria 2014-now: still there, achieved nothing, US lost
YOU ARE HERE
> Iran 2025: FILL IN THE BLANK

Do you really think it matters what bomber is used, or what weapons the soldiers will carry? What even is the point of Iran threads in /k/?

brown

>>63874144 (OP)
OP is a faggot as usual

>>63874144 (OP)
Now what do those places have in common today, thirdie? The ones that play ball with the US prosper, the ones that don't are sub-medieval shitholes.

>>63874188
Try winning a war first. You lost to Vietnamese peasants, Somalian tribesmen and Afghani goat herders.

>>63874144 (OP)
why do these lists always leave out desert storm?

>>63874202
We didn't lose any of those wars. We failed to nation build.

>>63874244
You seem rather upset

>>63874257
Weak bait.

>invade your shithole
>blow up hundreds of thousands of your fighting age males
>take 3 kia and leave
>any shitskin with an IQ over 90 follows
>your shithole is now blown up, brain drained, and economially fucked forever
>but US left so you "won"
lol

>>63874144 (OP)

>>63874144 (OP)
Well at least this time you didn't frogpost.

>>63874144 (OP)
> Syria 2014-now: still there, achieved nothing, US lost

They destroyed ISIS and secured a Kurdish foothold in Northern Syria that still exists. You're either comletely delusional or a troll.

I still like to post in threads so there we go

>>63874144 (OP)
>Korea 1950: nuclear stalemate

Meanwhile in reality

>goal of the UN coalition was to preserve the existence of South Korea
>South Korea not only survived, but is now a thriving democracy and one of the richest nations on Earth while North Korea is near the bottom of virtually every human development index

We won, you lost, Chang

ameribros... it's over...

>>63874144 (OP)
>Syria

You might want to check the news bud

>>63874289
Happy to see that Anne has embraced motherhood.

>>63874144 (OP)
What about that 80's operation?

And who won most wars?: Barry suppressed Vietnam and Korea, won the falklands, and then got dragged into yank shit that they lost

terrible troll thread I expect at least 300+ replies with maybe 50-60 unique posters (fuck you hiroshimoot)

>>63874303

>>63874236
Yeah, you conquered Iraq alright! Go walk through it with an American flag, you conqueror! You'll see how quick you'll get beheaded.

>>63874246
You lost the war of attrition every time. You did not achieve the objectives of the operation every time. You may have won individual battles, but you can't win wars, which is all that counts.

>>63874264
You paid one trillion to give 10 billion in equipment to the Taliban, making them a regional power after your army routed. Tens of thousands of Americans died to achieve nothing. The Taliban simply hid in the mountains until the US was financially fucked. When will you /k/tards learn that weapons are almost irrelevant when it comes to winning wars?

>>63874144 (OP)
Despite being a dumb shit fuck face motherfucking cocksucker, op managed to type coherent sentences. What a miracle.

>>63874286
> "but muh ISIS"
> ISIS still exists, just rebranded and scattered
> spent billions to blow up some Toyota trucks

>>63874289
You did not democratize Korea, you got half of it, and the other half helps your enemies and wants to nuke you.

>>63874301
What exactly did you achieve in Syria?

>>63874321
Superiority? Your elite supercommandos are literally worse soldiers than uncivilized Somali tribesmen with Soviet RPGs and AKs. All I'm saying is that you can't win wars, and you should stick to doing business, which you're good at.

>>63874347

>>63874356
You lost to this.
Even the Serbs managed to shoot down your Nighthawk with a worthless Soviet AA.
When will you realize that weapons don't matter?

>>63874202
Again. Sub-medieval shitholes. Or do you just ignore what was said so you can spam the same bullshit over and over again?

>>63874367
>When will you realize that weapons don't matter?
There comes a point where the bait is so bad, that you should be ashamed, and should leave for the rest of the forever.

>>63874379
turdies lack the self awareness necessary to feel shame

>>63874379
If weapons matter, why did you:
>lose to Vietnamese rice farmers
>lose to starving Somali tribesmen
>lose to Iraqi street gangs
>lose to Afghan goat farmers

The mettle of the soldiers (nonexistent in the US) and the strategic ability of the commanders (also nonexistent in the US) are hundreds of times more important than having trillion dollar planes with stealth nanomaterial coverings.

How many more wars do you have to lose to learn this?

Honestly though, getting bored of killing a shit ton of someone and just leaving isn't really losing. The game just doesn't have an end. You go in for a high score and then leave once you get it.

>>63874393
>we didn't want our military base situated between our three biggest rivals
>no, we didn't spend trillions proping a corrupt puppet government
>no, we didn't want to weaponize the opium fields again china

>>63874387
>implying

What blew up?