will thirdie-stile window grills become standard security practice? chicken wire on windows? public alert systems that sound sirens in an area if a drone is detected by sound/radio emissions?

>>63899839 (OP)
>iran executes a buncha randos "mossad"
>still get terrored in tehran
kek

>>63899851
honestly iran did the same in israel they hired poor/criminals to do grafitti/vandalism/film places. there's been like 40 arrests so far. israel did the same in iran but on a x100 scale (simply because 1 shekel is like a billion iranian reals)

iran is a spy's wet dream most spy work is hiring/bribing people and in iran you can hire an army for pocket change

(pic semi related, similar strike in gaza)

>>63899839 (OP)
appliance fire

>>63899839 (OP)
>2 IRGC 1 nuclear 'scientist' liquidated

>>63899839 (OP)
>Israel breaks the ceasefire and resumes its jewhad.
wow, who could have seen this coming

>>63900796
israel has been killing 1-2 terrorists daily in lebanon to enforce the ceasefire there, same strategy could work in iran.

also katz said israel will maintain air superiority over iran in the future so if irgc gets new equipment that could endanger israeli aviation it will be removed by idf

>>63900804
Yeah I think one of Israel's understated goals in this was to "Lebanize" Iran and establish a new normal. They end the war but have ended it with a foot in the door.

>>63900808
around a week in there were known irgc personnel filming 'gaza videos' in tehran so gazafication/lebanonfication seems to be agreeable to both sides

>>63900804
>terrorists
aka guy living in his own country who is being jewhaded by the jews who are stealing his land to create Greater Israel

>>63901614
aka bomb the guy launching rockets and drones so israel can justify taking more of lebanon. it all works out for the best.

>>63900804
>also katz said israel will maintain air superiority over iran
Still haven't seen any pictures of IDF planes over Tehran Moshe. Trying to cope over Israel's miserable failure of a war with Iran with literal terrorist attacks is pretty hilarious ngl.

>>63901717
it was in an interview yesterday
presumably the idea is to make sure they dont get advanced AD batteries or fighter planes so the next iran war can be done under air superiority too

>>63901727
IAF has to fly hours and get fueled up just to get to Iran's borders and you expect me to believe that they will be able to enforce air superiority over a country the size of central Europe when they couldn't even do that during the war? The fuck are you gonna do? Shoot down Chinese or Russian transport planes? Somehow destroy air defense batteries on the ground when you couldn't even stop TELs from launching?

It's meaningless propaganda for the dumbfuck Israel audience to cope with them losing a war THEY STARTED in spectacular fashion.

>>63901742
they did enforce it during the war and thats with the old planes, IDF is about to get a brand new KC-46A Pegasus squadron.

i think people underestimate the range of the F15I with conformal+drop tanks it can strike iran without refuels (theyll probably still do them so they can do long loiter, ballistic missile hunting missions..)

>>63901717
>Trying to cope over Israel's miserable failure of a war with Iran
Do you actually believe this? I'm going to bring up this post here because it's pointing out just how absurd you thirdies lie so blatantly
>>63836403
>What the fuck do you gain from it?

>>63901793
war is not a zero sum game and that's a good thing. the main reason most wars are bad is one side loses
this war was won by both sides, everyone is happy. next one will be won by both sides too

>>63901742
I don't think they can loiter over Iran for very long but there doesn't seem to be jack all the Iranians can do about it either.

>>63901754
The Iranians were posting vids of them launching clusters of missiles that take 3-4 hours to prep in broad daylight. Multiple times. Whatever "air superiority" the IAF had, it wasn't nearly enough.

>>63901793
>thirdies
Alright Pajeet, I'll humour you, what exactly did Israel get out of this conflict that was worth the cost? Ignoring the obvious damage to Israel, lets looks at their three main objectives.

>Regime Change
Absolute total failure. Population rallied around the flag while the reformist faction in Iranian politics was humiliated and the hardliners vindicated.

>Destruction of nuclear program
Near total failure. Had to call in Zognald to drop MOPs on Fordow and, regardless of the effectiveness of that strike, 400kg of 60% Uranium is somewhere and good luck trying to find it. Witkoff is already back in Oman offering Iran $20-$30B for a "civilian nuclear program" and unfreezing $6B in Iranian assets if they agree to not have any in country enrichment lmao.

>Destruction of ballistic missile program
Also near total failure. Couldn't stop launches, couldn't destroy underground factories or missile cities, handful of TELs that weren't decoys actually knocked out were destroyed with on the ground assets, not planes. Got so embarrassing the IDF twitter started reposting the same strike but minorly edited lmao.

So please tell me, Sanjay, what did Israel actually gain?

>>63901825
Yea, Iranian AD outside the cities seemed non-existent, but the sheer size of Iran and its terrain made whatever air superiority they had a near non-factor. Plus the Iranian FM is likely on a Chinese shopping spree so Israel may not get this air superiority chance again.

>>63901866

>>63901866
>he Iranians were posting vids of them launching clusters of missiles that take 3-4 hours to prep in broad daylight
While Israel posts videos of them destroying the launchers. You aren't posting a flex, you're posting an unconvincing statistic that will just become a statistical anomaly given enough time. And not that much time, either.

Also, you knew everything I've just said is true and is what is actually material to the conversation. You knew that before you posted what you posted.

>>63901875
>frogposting
I accept your concession. Please don't come to the weapons and war board unless you want to actually discuss weapons and war, thanks.

>>63901866
if the enriched uranium was intact and accessible, iran would say so. thus far they have only admitted that their nuclear processing facilities have suffered severe damage.
as for missile spam, "total failure" is based on your criteria that all missiles or launchers were destroyed, which nobody would agree with. the severe decline in launches is evidence of severe erosion of that capability.

>>63901898
Alright Tehran Terrance, I'm sure your top brass getting ACK'd was actually just an elaborate IRGC psyop that we all fell for. In fact, the Ayatollah is enjoying dinner with them as we speak in his bunker!
>the AIslop images of the shot-down F-35 and F-3500 were actually real

>>63901903
>iran would say so
lmao why would they. So they can get surprise attacked again? Ambiguity is the best thing possible for them. Plus there was no detection of a radiation leak from Fordow.

>the severe decline in launches is evidence of severe erosion of that capability.
Likely a tactic to deplete Israel's interceptors as even these smaller swarms of Iran's oldest missile class were rapidly consuming Israel's stockpile, clearing the way for slower and more accurate stuff down the line as Iran was clearly trying to turn this into a war of attrition. There's a reason why Israel was the one to ask for a ceasefire.

If the IAF actually meaningfully depleted their TELs, they would be posting vids of it. They haven't because they didn't because they couldn't. Most of the TELs destroyed were destroyed with on the ground assets in the beginning of the war. It's as simple as that.

>>63901909
Please point to literally any time in modern military history where the assassination of leadership resulted in any meaningful degradation of military capabilities. In fact, you probably did the IRGC a favor as getting rid of a bunch of generals is a good way to get fresh, more adaptable to change blood in the ranks. Eisenhower wiped out nearly the entire general corps on the eve of WW2 and you can't call America's performance in WW2 unsatisfactory.

>>63901922
>"you did us a favor by killing our leadership, actually!"
>uses us as an example, just completely ignoring that we have generations of soldiers with experience in combat compared to iran
this is just sad

>>63901866
>Alright Pajeet, I'll humour you, what exactly did Israel get out of this conflict that was worth the cost? [...] Had to call in Zognald to drop MOPs on Fordow
I don't think you understand how big of a W it is for Bibi to get the U.S. to team up with Israel on a direct military operation. They always tried to keep some distance until now. It'd be like Russian or Chinese and Iranian jets taking part in the same military op. But the bigger strategic consequences will be if the Saudis and Syrians now sign up to the Abraham Accords as a result. That will be the big W.

>>63901903
>if the enriched uranium was intact and accessible, iran would say so.
Yeah I think it's fucked and the DIA report was overly conservative.

>>63901866
>Couldn't stop launches
Lemme guess, so long as Iran could fire one missile it means Israel was TOTALLY DEFEATED

>>63901922
>lmao why would they. So they can get surprise attacked again? Ambiguity is the best thing possible for them. Plus there was no detection of a radiation leak from Fordow.
Because it gives them a bargaining advantage with the US. If it's actually intact it means it's hidden somewhere else, so an ambush makes no sense. IAEA does not have any on-site radiation detectors at Fordow. Whatever the Iranian nuclear safety body says is largely irrelevant if it's likely that the uranium is elsewhere.
>Likely a tactic to deplete Israel's interceptors as even these smaller swarms of Iran's oldest missile class were rapidly consuming Israel's stockpile, clearing the way for slower and more accurate stuff down the line as Iran was clearly trying to turn this into a war of attrition. There's a reason why Israel was the one to ask for a ceasefire.
The ceasefire was forced on Israel. It makes no sense to voluntarily ease missile spam during steady attrition of launchers, especially when they have a theoretical surplus of missiles. Practically speaking they no longer had that capability to spam.

>>63901922
>Likely a tactic to deplete Israel's interceptors as even these smaller swarms of Iran's oldest missile class were rapidly consuming Israel's stockpile, clearing the way for slower and more accurate stuff down the line as Iran was clearly trying to turn this into a war of attrition. There's a reason why Israel was the one to ask for a ceasefire.
Yep. That's when you sign ceasefires. Right as your plan was beginning to work and your enemy was on the cusp of defeat, and your opponents had just proven their weapons couldn't touch your completely intact nuclear program. You should also fold when you draw a straight flush.

>>63901938
They keep their distance because Israel likes larping as a strong independent military power that doesn't need endless support to fight. Unfortuanantly this time they aren't fighting a force they massively outnumber and outgun so they had to call in Zion Don for a strike so that they can pretend that the war wasn't a total disaster because they "knocked" out Iran's nuclear program.

>Saudis
Lmao no. MBS doesn't care for the Palis but the population does. He stepped on a LOT of toes to get to where he is so he actually decides to normalize with Israel he'd get assassinated. Syria sure. They're already an Israeli puppet state anyway.

>>63901951
There was no steady attrition of launchers. If they were actually knocking them out they would post vids of them, but they didn't. Instead we have multiple vids of Iranians launching clusters of their longest to prepare missiles in broad daylight. The fact that Israel was already talking about running out of interceptors with these smaller swarms speaks volumes of the tactic.

>>63901961
>If they were actually knocking them out they would post vids of them, but they didn't
Anon, they literally have been

>>63901961
>There was no steady attrition of launchers. If they were actually knocking them out they would post vids of them, but they didn't. Instead we have multiple vids of Iranians launching clusters of their longest to prepare missiles in broad daylight. The fact that Israel was already talking about running out of interceptors with these smaller swarms speaks volumes of the tactic.
They did post videos, and their launches declined precipitously after the first three days. It's obvious that Iran is a big country and there will be dozens of launchers without eyes on them, but that does not contradict the reality that they lost the ability to spam.

>>63901972
inb4
>B-B-BUT THE LYING JEWS SHOW JUST THE SAME ONE LAUNCHER FROM MULTIPLE ANGLES!!!!!!

>>63901973
The majority of their TEL destruction vids came from the opening surprise attack and were destroyed by on the ground assets. They made elaborate claims of mass destruction of Iran's launcher fleet, but provided no proof while Iran freely posted vids of them launching large clusters in broad daylight using their longest to prepare missile class.

Unless the IDF posts proof, they're lying like they always do lol. Literally the HIMARs autism from a few years back except this time its okay because Jewish or something.

>israel doing terrorism again

>>63901990
>mentions HIMARS
Oh very nice, Iran's paying vatniggers to shill for them

>>63901961
>If they were actually knocking them out they would post vids of them, but they didn't.
>>63901990
>The majority of their TEL destruction vids came from the opening surprise attack
Nice walkback lol
So which one is it? Israel has showed proof at all, or it has showed some proof?

>>63901990
Both can be true at the same time: hundreds of launchers exist in the wild, and Israel destroyed enough launchers to largely stop the spam. You've somehow made them mutually exclusive and they aren't.

>>63901866
>Plus the Iranian FM is likely on a Chinese shopping spree so Israel may not get this air superiority chance again.
I don't understand, why would using Chinese weapons make the Iranians any more capable of resisting Israel than using Iranian weapons?

>>63901938
>DIA report was overly conservative.
Of course the report was conservative, it was made like 48 hours after the strike

>>63899839 (OP)
>FPV strike in tehran today

I thought there was supposed to be a ceasefire

>>63902042
this is to enforce the ceasefire

>>63902042
Iran violated the ceasefire within an hour of it going into effect and fired two missiles at Tel Aviv, not surprising since Islam commands Muslims to break treaties and ceasefires with non-Muslims (Hudna) and to lie to achieve a tactical advantage. wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya
Around Muslims never relax.