Thread 64056781

We need bigger drones

>>64056788
2nd the motion

>>64056801
this is some /x/ cursed creepypasta vehicle what the fuck

>>64056781 (OP)
>>64056801
>buzzards right, eyes on!
https://youtu.be/IQWEbQSH_nc?feature=shared

>>64056781 (OP)
This war is literally turning into fucking MM: Fury Road

>>64056781 (OP)
how long until we'll see contraptions like this but without an engine
just being carried around like a medieval battering ram

>>64056781 (OP)
That is damn Orky.

>>64056801
>>64056781 (OP)
URAAAAAAAAAAAA

ṫ̴̛̠͚̟͈̮̣̰̖̠͚̻̗̩̝͉̠̰̰̖̰̮̏͒͋̌͑̈̈̒̑͋̆̏̍̓͘͝ͅa̷̧̬̞̞͚͙̠̜͖͈̬̯̝̫̰͍̬̺͚̩͍͈̓̄́͋̑̔̿́̈́̑̈̓̈́̏̎͒̃͘͠͝͝n̷̤̙͉̙̠̺͚̟̞̬͚͎̖̪̗̰̉̔̇̾̈͛͊̇̒̃̀́̋̿̚͠k̸̢̡̢͍̳̝̣͍̦̗̯̝̹͇̣̗̻̣̭̹̭̜̟͂̐̆̈́̾͛̀́̄͂̈́̋̀̃̃̂͂̉̚̕̚ͅ

>>64056826
I was about to post the same thing kek

>>64056817
>>64056815
>The Buzzards are a scavenging wastelander tribe of bandits of Russian descent living in underground burrows known as the Sunken City.

Nostradamus moment for Miller there. It must have been revealed to him in a dream.

Not sure if to keep drones out or conscripts in

>>64056835
both

>>64056835
>drive cage to enemy position
>nothing happens
>enemy approaches to investigate
>cage bursts open, swarms of drones fly out

>>64056781 (OP)
ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

Unspoken Horror from the Yamantau secret labs

>>64056817
Mad Manya: Rooster Road

i'm looking forward to burke destroyers with literal factory buildings over the top of them.

it will be 100% kino.

>>64056781 (OP)
What's under that thing and can they see anything out of it?

>>64056801
>and what do drones get stuck in?
Hair?
>No you retard, TREES.
>We plant the TREES in the vatnikmobile, and the drones can't touch us.

>>64056920
First remotely operated vatnikmobil, its remotely operated because crew can’t see shit so someone on radio has to navigate them

>>64056923
Ukraine's entire ecology is now drone based.

>>64056814
its very obviously a hunting rig or safari/scouting rig.

>>64056781 (OP)
unironically
just like planes got bigger

>>64056976
We need to bring back biplanes, the perfect anti-drone aircraft

>>64056781 (OP)
how common are EFPs in ukriane if these contraptions are considered worth building?

So what's the solution to these?

>>64057027
They get penned by everything that a normal tank or softskin vehicle is

>>64056801
The place and the light makes it look like some sort of unfinished art installation.

>>64057027
Double team them. First a blast explosive to clear out the standoff stuff, then a perforator to disable its rolling gear.

>>64057027
Wait until infantry is jumping off and then drone the infantry.

>>64057034
Right but the issue here is that drones are by far the most common munition used to destroy vehicles. If Ukraine had a gorllion Stugna-P or RK-3 Corsar or FGM-172 SRAW or FGM-148 Javelin or MOSKIT or Pirat PPK (latter two only came out this year) then they wouldn't need to use drones. They'd just have multiple ATGM/MANPATS teams on the frontlines that just delete armoured thrusts. They use drones because they're cheap and easy.

>>64057045
I've seen claims, though no videos, of vehicles like this needing 60~ drones to disable. I call bullshit, but I'd like to see a video anyway.

>>64057051
Well if it's on a tank then the tank isn't dropping infantry off (unless infantry is ablative human armour).

>>64057053
>Well if it's on a tank then the tank isn't dropping infantry off (unless infantry is ablative human armour).
If a tank looks like that then it isn't doing tank stuff like shooting.

>>64057057
Hey when have Russians EVER cared about aim? Literally yesterday (or day before) a Russian SU-34 dropped a FAB on a Russian position. Thankfully the bomb didn't go off. Unfortunately, a Ukrainian drone spotted it and decided to facefuck the FAB, with predictable results. Of course xaxaxaxaxa you wasted drone )))). But either way Russia often uses running tanks that either have degraded barrels or low ammo (or sometimes flat out don't put any in) as 'shield tanks'. Where their goal is just to soak up drones, rather than do any damage.

>>64057053
Drones have longer range than most ground-ground ATGMs, and can loiter. Meaning you can prepare a beaten zone from quite far away, with stuff in the air 10+ minutes before shit goes off.

>>64057053
>I've seen claims, though no videos, of vehicles like this needing 60~ drones to disable.
I think those numbers were for complete destruction, not just disabling. So they couldn't be towed back, summarily fixed, then sent out again.
There's a lot of empty air in that structure, so a critical hit is difficult to achieve.

>>64057063
Yes which is what I said. That they're cheap and easy [to use]. If they had a gorllion ATGM systems they'd be using those much more than drones because they have a much higher kill chance, see early stages of the war with NLAW and Javelin kills. Sadly they are expensive and rare and the new ones I mentioned (MOSKIT and Pirat PPK) are not in any large numbers. Poland is joint developer so maybe they'll be able to get numbers out.

>>64057073
I mean I guess, but the guy didn't clarify or provide proofs.

>>64056945
That's so sad.

>>64057027
Drop an AT mine on them

>>64056781 (OP)
What is the purpose of this thing? Troop transport? How would troops get in and out without getting cut up? Maybe there's a way to shift it out of the way, but have fun doing that under fire.

>>64056781 (OP)
WAAAAAGH

>>64056781 (OP)
Just drop artillery or a ATGM on the fucker. The drones were always a stop gap due to the lack of the former.

>>64057204
I had saved a pic of an entire forest draped in hundreds of criss crossing fiber optic cables but I can't find it. They're going to be cleaning up the front for the next 100 years, just like the last 100.

>>64056801
>>64056781 (OP)

the russians will geneticaly moddify themselves to be able to reproduce aesexualy via spore they drop after death

>>64057302
>Troop transport
a fun language lesson for you: "troop" in russia means "a dead body" kek

>>64056781 (OP)
The meatcube. You opened it. We came.

>>64056781 (OP)
I wonder how molotovs or other incendiary devices would work on those things, given the enormous surface area the flammable substance can stick to, and all the cracks it can flow into.

>>64056801
Can we get /tv/ here so we can identify which mad Max movie this thing belongs to?

>>64057004
We should resurrect a squadron of ww1 era planes and make a flying circus of drones.

>>64056781 (OP)
The Russians have become reavers.
So fly a big drone with an IED on it, land it right in front of its path, and detonate it under the tank.

>>64056820
Mantlets are making a comeback

>>64056801
That is some True Detective shit

>>64056781 (OP)
>it's not meant to keep drones out
>it's meant to contain something even worse

>>64056817
Mad Max X Looney Toons

>>64056945
>>64057204
life uh... finds a way

>>64056822
Knew it reminded me of something.

>>64063002
Grond is a fucking work of art compared to this shit. I will not have you badmouth the Dark Lord's work by comparing the two.

>>64063102
History always repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce.

It is in its worm stage and will soon become a buttercopter

>>64056781 (OP)
I kind of get why they think the wires on top may help, but why did they think completely covering the places the crew enter and exit the vehicle in razor wire was a good idea?

>>64063287
Stops people from entering or leaving the vehicle.

>>64056976
You won't be seeing those in Ukraine since CCP put export ban on bigger drones like pic related DJI Agras.

>>64063287
Something to cut your own throat with once you're wounded.

>>64056781 (OP)
>>64056801
At what point are armored vehicles even worth using if something as cheap as a drone is this effective against it? But I guess if this question were actually answered in good faith then Russia would just end the war and go home.