← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 64091391

26 posts 4 images /k/
Anonymous No.64091391 >>64091425 >>64091463 >>64091864 >>64095058
Imagine being some retarded teenager getting high in the woods around the fence of a power plant and getting smoked with no warning by the DOE tac response
Anonymous No.64091425 >>64091439
>>64091391 (OP)
>Imagine being some retarded teenager getting high in the woods around the fence of a power plant and getting smoked with no warning
didnt this happen to some dudes S.T.A.L.K.E.R. larping in russia like 2 years ago
Anonymous No.64091439 >>64092895
>>64091425
I had no idea the DOE gets around like that.
Anonymous No.64091463 >>64091853 >>64093265
>>64091391 (OP)
what are those yellow pants, chaps?
Anonymous No.64091853
>>64091463
probably some security uniform
Anonymous No.64091864 >>64091883
>>64091391 (OP) There ain't no trees at Hanford. That shit is in the desert.
Anonymous No.64091883 >>64091914 >>64093249 >>64095488
>>64091864
In the evergreen state
Anonymous No.64091914
>>64091883
Axes and chainsaws, bro. You should see the place. Maybe a few trees on the river bank.
Anonymous No.64092895 >>64095306 >>64095550 >>64096004 >>64097131 >>64097910 >>64101550 >>64101556
>>64091439
Department of Energy lore is insane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Protective_Forces

> The FPFs have been described by the DOE as "elite fighting forces" designed to operate in "combat environments".

>The Federal Protective Forces are heavily armed, which is reflective of the anticipated capabilities of an adversary likely to attempt an assault against a Category I material-holding site. The current hypothetical adversary against which Protective Forces prepare is described in a 2004 Design Basis Threat (DBT) issued by the Department of Energy. Though the DBT is classified, the hypothetical adversary has been generally described as a "larger" force that would seek to overrun the defenses of a DOE facility in order to capture Category I special material. Department of Energy studies have indicated that up to 50 percent of a Protective Forces detachment would be killed responding to some variations of the threat envisaged.

>Some have called for Category I material-holding sites located near populated areas to be moved to more remote regions due to the threat of heavy civilian deaths that could be incidentally inflicted by the Protective Forces while defending a site from attack. For instance, a neighborhood sits within the 1.5-mile (2.4 km) range of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory's M134 gun emplacements, creating the potential that "children at play, joggers and families working in their yards" could be struck by stray bullets from Federal Protective Forces if an attack originated from their direction.

>An NNSA study noted that the level of force and types of weaponry the Protective Forces would deploy in pursuit of an adversary which had seized nuclear material and moved it off-site may produce heavy "collateral non-combatant casualties" during a recapture operation.
Anonymous No.64093249
>>64091883
Yes, anything east of the cascades is a fucking wasteland shit sucks. The only reason there's any green is because they irrigate the shit out of rivers to grow orchards there, outside of river range it's just rocks and small shrubs.
Anonymous No.64093265
>>64091463
yea hazmat chaps so he can bare his whole naked ass to the reactor
Anonymous No.64095058
>>64091391 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJiYc-6XcIU

The DOE is fucking insane
Anonymous No.64095306 >>64095550
>>64092895
>Department of Energy studies have indicated that up to 50 percent of a Protective Forces detachment would be killed responding to some variations of the threat envisaged.
>For instance, a neighborhood sits within the 1.5-mile (2.4 km) range of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory's M134 gun emplacements, creating the potential that "children at play, joggers and families working in their yards" could be struck by stray bullets from Federal Protective Forces if an attack originated from their direction
>An NNSA study noted that the level of force and types of weaponry the Protective Forces would deploy in pursuit of an adversary which had seized nuclear material and moved it off-site may produce heavy "collateral non-combatant casualties" during a recapture operation.
Imagine the body cam /k/ino
Anonymous No.64095488 >>64098475
>>64091883
The entire southeast part of Washington is sagebrush and farmland, you fuck.
>509 area code, wishing Ferguson eats a bullet in minecraft
Anonymous No.64095550
>>64092895
>>64095306

Also note that their ROE is basically kill everyone who is a potential threat. Hostages are all 100% expendable if Category I material is on the line.
Anonymous No.64096004
>>64092895
>M134 gun emplacements
Rule of cool and all that
Anonymous No.64097131
>>64092895
They're real-life HECU.
Anonymous No.64097910 >>64098413
>>64092895
>The Protective Forces are recruited and employed by private companies, yet are trained, equipped, and under the operational command of Defense Nuclear Security, a program of the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (two Protective Forces, those at the Savannah River Site and the Idaho National Laboratory, are under the control of the DOE's Office of Environmental Management). Each Department of Energy site housing a Protective Forces contingent contracts with a different company for manpower.[1]
ah
Anonymous No.64098413 >>64098495
>>64097910
>The Protective Forces are recruited and employed by private companies
Few years ago I was at the SOCOM trade show in Tampa
>guy walks up to booth
>badge says Pinkerton
>"we have SAWs (M-249), whatta ya got for them?"
>wut.jpg
Dude was leading a team at a DOE site, wouldn't say where.
>can I send you some swag?
>sure.mp3
>he hands me a card, with DOE site location
Anonymous No.64098475
>>64095488
I don't think he likes guns and probably wouldn't have one at the dinner table. You'd have to force feed it to him. In minecraft.
Anonymous No.64098495 >>64101522
>>64098413
>>badge says Pinkerton
Welp, there goes any chance they might have any concern for civilian casualties in the event of an attack.
Anonymous No.64101522
>>64098495
kek
Anonymous No.64101532 >>64101541
Retard here. What is Category I material?
Anonymous No.64101541
>>64101532
fissile material above a certain quantity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_nuclear_material
Anonymous No.64101550
>>64092895
I seem to recall hearing somewhere that these guys are authorised to deploy nerve agents as part of a recovery effort
Anonymous No.64101556
>>64092895
I remember someone once described the DoE's rules of engagement as "a constitution free zone"