>>64194839
>the alternative would be having no S&W today
Considering all their best guns were made in the distant past and are still plentiful and preferable to use over their new ones, I don't really care about that.
>eating your own
They aren't mine, I don't have a parasocial relationship with corporate rats. They give me a working product, I give them money. They don't do that, I don't do that. If that kills them, oh well, womp fucking womp, I'll just buy from someone who isn't being a greedy retard. Simple as.
>>64194938
>I guess you won't buy from any 1911 that offers 80 FPS or titanium firing pins
Modern 1911s are ugly as sin and the titanium pins don't offer much benefit for the added cost, so no, I probably won't.
>or ARs from manufacturers that offered bullet buttons for CA, or sells limited capacity magazines to ban states?
That doesn't affect me as I'm not a ban state cuck, Shit & Wesson sold Hillary holes as standard across the entire country with no option to not have one up until extremely recently. False equivalence. When they produce revolvers without Hillary holes that don't cost more than the ones with them, I'll buy one. Until that happens, I won't. Simple as.