>>64161819
what the fuck is with those non-specific descriptions? Obviously half of them are patents improving an existing invention but it doesn't say that or specify what the improvement in design was it just says "lock", "mop", "horse shoe", "keychain" "riding saddles".
As if some nigga in 1880 would get his house burgled every night because no locks exist and he no keychain to put a key on anyway. All he has left is his wet dirty floor and a horse no one wants because there is no way to sit on a horse securely or protect its feet from debris.