>>64262492
>The NCR/BoS conflict makes perfect sense if you assume they're two political factions jockeying for power.
from a narrative perspective, a lot of stuff has to happen off-screen for the conflict to make sense
in fallout 1, the good ending explicitly says they stay out of the power struggle
while in fallout 2, the BoS are the only faction actively investigating the enclave, doing so on the down low to avoid attention
they couldnt care less about wasteland politics, they care about a shadowy organization with tech that outstrips theirs and who they suspect, correctly, dont intend to use that tech for good
for them to suddenly be in conflict in van buren/FNV requires a lot of stuff to transpire that causes the BoS in particular to act way differently compared to how they were depicted in the first 2 games
it isnt exactly wrong to show them acting differently and then to show over time what led to them suddenly changing, but FNV occasionally acts like the BOS have always been autistic bunker babies rather than having changed over time into that
the NCRs more unsavory tendencies were actually thoroughly explored in fallout 2, so them being imperialistic isnt actually unfounded
but van buren would have had BOS be the one to start the war because they couldnt trust the NCR with leftover enclave tech from navarro
FNV is even less sypathethic to the BOS, they just started seizing NCRs energy weapons one day