Thread 40155780

>want to understand my sexuality better
>IT JUST WORKS THAT WAY BECAUSE IT DOES OKAY
>EVERYONE KNOWS THAT
>WHY THE FUCK DO YOU CARE AUTIST?
Why are boomerhons and zoomers so terminally anti-curiosity and anti-science?

>>40155780 (OP)
you do sound like you have autism. it is very annoying to have someone continuously keep asking why like theyre a six year old

>>40155780 (OP)

Don't take things so personally. It'll warp your worldview. I study neurology and have a strong interest in sexual psychology. What do you want to know anon.

>>40155780 (OP)
>Want to understand my sexuality more
>NO EXPERIMENT
>Only label plz
Just have sex retard
There is no knowing there is only doing

>>40155809
Why is sexual masochism a thing. Like not evolutionarily but "how" does that happen. Why is my entire body an erogenous zone and why does being hurt just feel, good when aroused, on E?

>>40155791
>>40155817

fyi they think not thinking is cool like every other retard because it implies you're out accomplishing things instead of thinking when really you're out doing things but not thinking and that usually accomplishes squat.

>>40155780 (OP)
My sexuality is that I watch increasingly extreme pornography all hours of the day and I never have sex with anyone ever. What do you call this?

>>40155817
You're being presumptuous about what I'm even asking. I do. That's what led to the question!

>>40155866

By how do you mean physiologically? Like what neurotransmitters, organs, limbic nodes are lobes are primarily involved?

It has a lot to do with estrogen yes. Female bodies have stronger enzymes and less varience between chromosomes, which means stronger hormone receptors and neurotransmitters. Aromatase is partly responsible for this, it's the primary enzyme that creates estrogen and responsible for converting estradiol and testosterone. In laymens terms you should have stronger orgasms on E, longer or more intense periods of horniness in general because your body is more receptive to hormones that constitute emotions and sensations in general. Does it make you masochistic, no. That was already inside of you. Since many neurotransmitters have dual purpose (oxytocin is used for both pleasure and secreting milk from breast glands for ex) being more emotional now ties any neural pathways between emotions and pain, and then pain and pleasure that you had but were struggling to connect.

>>40156075

>are nodes
and nodes*

Also I hope this explains the sensation of full body orgasm understanding it is more to the amount of estrogen in your body than how you masturbate.

>>40156075
Do you have any sources on this, and I mean physiologically. That's sort of what I'm driving at. If true I'd like to read more.
I got no emotional changes on E personally.

>>40156128
That explains the full body orgasm, but not the masochism. I'm not more emotional now at all.

>>40156075
This is interesting. But i like the anthropological viewpoint of masochism. Women who didnt have masochism were less likely to survive brutal times.
Because you're a feminine individual(neurologically speaking), masochism is ingrained in you and there is nothing that can be done about it.

The more interesting question is where does sadism come from? And why is it more common in males? Perhaps for the similar reasons, tho its hard to believe cruelty let to more success, but then again, maybe it did, since it seems to me it is always the worst people who gain "success " in this world.
So looking at it philosophically, maybe we live in a prison dimension where evil is rewarded and goodness is punished.

Who knows. I am bitter and cynical about the nature of reality

>>40155780 (OP)
cultural mandates for the sake of compliance

>>40156293
>Because you're a feminine individual(neurologically speaking), masochism is ingrained in you and there is nothing that can be done about it.
Again, do you have a source on this

>>40156169
>>40156306
both before and after, with measurable differences in both cases, tranny brains are different from cissy brains
being trans is a form of neurological intersex (and probably so is being a homo)

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8955456/
>Brain Sex in Transgender Women Is Shifted towards Gender Identity
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7132951/
>Sex Matters: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis of Sex- and Gender-Related Neuroanatomical Differences in Cis- and Transgender Individuals Using Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6235900/
>What has sex got to do with it? The role of hormones in the transgender brain

>>40156333
Okay where does this actually address any of what I was actually asking about though WRT masochism.

>>40156345
sorry, I wasn't trying to address that part (which sounds a little sexist but I imagine could also totally have a real case for it built if you look at studies of sexuality in men and women with regard to dom/sub and s/m tendencies and how that interacts with the physical act of hetero piv sex) so much as supporting the literal fembrained bit in general

>>40156364
"That part" was explicitly what I was asking about and why I made the thread. That's all I care about. I already know what you linked and it's not helpful.

>>40156370
well, you didn't indicate that until now, at all

>>40156376
See >>40155866

I didn't start the thread off with it because people don't read and I'd get kneejerk reddit responses if I did. But this is *the* question.

>>40156169

I would not be surprised since it's not as though you get randomly emotional solely because of E. Women aren't bipolar, and you probably don't recognize the difference between emotion and sexual gratification when estrogen is most active inside you (when you're horny) because it plays a role in both.


What estrogen is->
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538260/

What aromatase is and it's observable interactions with estrogen-->

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557856/

Estrogen effect on structures in the temporal lobe, dopamine/serotonin system and subsequent emotional spikes/disorders. -->

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9673602/

White and grey matter difference in male and female anatomy (to address the abstract idea that females have more responsive neurotransmitters and receptors for more reasons than just estrogen. 40% faster blodflow in white matter, white matter being communicative. Grey's function storing and processing) ----> https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39120466/#:~:text=Females displayed 40%25 higher perfusion,; regional differences; sex differences.

>>40156448
But again, where does this address the specific claims WRT masochism

because it functions by chasing a virtual horizon of desire, the thing you desire is spectral carrot that you are always chasing and can never catch the actual content of what you desire is a recombination autofiction that will dissolve under analysis. Thats why people get upset when you go poking at it, not out of anti-intellectualism (all though alot of people are retarded apes so it is for them) but because you are frustrating their suspension of disbelief necessary to enjoy the content of their fantasy. Go too far down the road and you turn into a bloodless academic type that can't enjoy anything.

>>40156480

It shows the neurotransmitters for sex and emotion work together. You were already masochistic. That is always emotional I should say, but I avoided saying that because we're getting into the evolutionary purpose of masochism sorta. It's a defense mechanism like sexuality on a whole is, even the standard sexuality is an attempt to save the creature through reproduction even if it doesn't feel desperate in the traditional sense more like urgent or important when horny. The reason it doesn't feel like it was already inside you is an emotion is a bunch of factors inside you, different neurotransmitters affecting different parts of your body. Some of them stay in effect when taking part in your sexual urges. Some leave. That should connect the dots in your mind why desperate sexual craving feels a little different from desperate fighting for survival. And why feeling bad in one instance just feels bad in that instance, perhaps pre-estrogen. But good now, with the help of estrogen and other factors.

>>40156293

I like the evolutionary function of sexyality too even as a borderline antinatlist lol. It is more interesting how the phenomenon developed over time than how it operates within the individual but you must understand one to truly understand the other.

>>40156540
I disagree with this user.

>>40156627
A time traveling machine would be cool. Imagine being able to document the life of neanderthals.
If they ever do create a singularity or it creates itself, i guess that might become possible then. But i think you need like Dyson spheres to even get that sorta computing power. At that level of stimulated realirt we are essentially just creatingin a parallel world. So every evil and good will be duplicated.
Its hard to justify all the horrors of humanity being committed twice, but then by that logic how does one even justify it once? It cant be justified so antintalism is a pretty sane take.
Then again, the argument for life and space travel is compelling.
And would our ancestors not want the human race to forge on?
It becomes then a sort of mission of guilt, or perhaps a sunken cost fallacy, we have already done so much evil, we must justify it by finally reaching good.

>>40156871

If we had the technology to travel through however many dimensions and find/create 'our world' we'd be a completely different species by then on a different world. a
And our old concepts limited by human perception would be discarded. We wouldn't percieve time linearly and then ironically enough we would not need the ask what progress would be made or what discoveries would be cool by the human definition of need. We would need to, to preserve the decisions we already made in the future, not to get something we are missing. I find that terrifying. But also comforting in a way, knowing that is an enlightened human state even if it is death to everything I know and love. If I knew that's where humanity was headed I wouldn't mind but whose to say.

>>40156871
>>40157000

Both of you have wanted to get fucked at one point another, at least when I talked to you. Why are you still online being insecure volcels instead of embracing the cute of being cute harem housewives?

t. me

>>40155780 (OP)
science isn't real fag. go take your clotshot.

>>40157102

Medusaposter here I don't know you. If you know me call me by name. I'm volcel but there isn't even an argument here to imply insecurity read the room.

>>40157144

Maybe it's not you but you seem like Uko. Please don't worry, my dms are always open for someone such as yourself. The only reason I'm implying insecurity is you know I would have visited you and cuddled you if you weren't so shy.

>>40155780 (OP)
There is no single cause.

>>40157144
She's some weirdo and an abuser. Has a wife but is on a never ending quest to find "admirers", basically she looks for vulnerable people to abuse and make dependent on her. And her wife is ok with it so honestly theyre both trash humans.

>>40157380
They know me don't worry. I don't need admirers, I just think it would be nice. I don't like simple friendships, complex friendships are wonderful for that reason.

>>40157380

I believe you, them responding to me past a block is enough for me. I don't know why when people get blocked they can't just leave it alone. I haven't done that since 19 years old.

>>40157485

I'm not that bad I hope... I haven't even tried to add you since then. I just noticed you seem frustrated these days and you happened to reply to one of the other cute people I know.

Later, I suppose.

>>40157485
>I don't know why when people get blocked they can't just leave it alone.
maybe because you're name/avatarfagging on a site that isn't discord? take your drama back there

>>40157706

But I'm not. The way I type and what I care about is just recognizable for anyone's who's come across me before. Also. That's not a reason to reply, that's just why they can. The reason was they're attached to me in some way, and that is what is bad for them and for me. Your 3rd opinion doesn't factor.