>>42251318Lets say that I plant an eggplant in my yard. It grows from rain. I eat it raw. I did not pay $3.99 for that eggplant.
Lets say that I go to the store and buy an eggplant for $3.99. I eat that eggplant. It cost me money.
That does not change the fact that the first eggplant did not cost me money.
To make a claim like "the fact rarity has bought cloths before goes against the idea that she's not paying real money" is to try, intentionally, to avoid processing what you are being told.
> AJ doesn't have to be thousands of dollars in debt to be strapped for cash and not able to replace damaged equipment.She does. Is she is not in debt, then she is able to afford a thing which her business requires in order to make money.
>rarity doesn't careTHIS is why we are still talking.
Cause this is wrong.
The whole basis of every thing I have said is to disabuse you of that exact notion, since the very first post. It does not stand up that rarity, on account of not meeting your absurd demand, must then be a horrid person. You said it bothered you, that you were thinking about it, that you were thinking about how rarity does not preform this action which you think she should preform. I'm telling you why she shouldn't preform it.
Every human on earth could be giving their money and time to any number of causes which could be considered objectively good from any perspective which cares about the average well being of humans. We don't. If we did, we would all be with fewer resources. We must eat. Behaving in a maximally philanthropic way, with absolutely no self interest, would kill us all, and then end each of our philanthropic contributions.
Sometimes, in this world full of selfish people, we take actions which benefit others, when we think we can afford it. More often, we preform jobs. These jobs sacrifice our time, but support a system of order and agriculture which generally allows life to thrive for us. Small amounts of effort are scraped from these events and, as a result, children live to become adults.
While rarity is a fairly mercenary character, it's not unusual for her to take a task she was going to do, which is create fancy designer dresses for the growth of her brand, and cause that event to serve multiple purposes. If she chose not to do that, and instead put an equivalent amount of time and effort towards the repair of her friends houses, she actually would go broke, because rarity is donating a very generous amount in value. If she gave a 300% plow, that would be 300$s worth of generous. It would be good, probably, if she could afford it. Her gesture of thousands of dollars in cloths is not LESS generous.
No matter how many times I say it, you simply ignore the points
1. Rarity is paying less than other people would. She is.
2. Applejack can either afford the plow, or she can't.