>>42495490
>I'm not even a prude, but every post is about attraction, not the character.
Not every post, but yeah, about 90% of posts are. They kinda used to be a bit better in that regard about 4 or 5 years ago, but the thread's quality has degraded along with the rest of the board/site as a whole.
I might argue about you being a prude though, an entire thread with no posts about attraction, stallion or otherwise? I think you might need re-examine where you are or what you should expect, or learn how to hide individual thread posts.
>A green about a stallion that doesn't mention his sexual orientation or good looks would be impossible to see in a stallion thread.
I don't know about impossible, but yes, it would be very rare and who knows if it would get much attention (those faggots don't even show attention to the greens that they apparently SHOULD care about). Also I just think stallions are attractive in general, you wouldn't need to outright state it.
>The fact that you're telling me the generically named stallion thread isn't for me is proof enough, and laughable when there obviously isn't enough interest in male characters for them to stand on their own in any other capacity.
Welp, I'm sorry if you see it that way, but yeah, I don't think there's just enough interest in the male characters of the show, without it being at least somewhat sexually charged, to sustain a general. One-off threads here and there would probably survive and do well if handled properly (the Lyra threads a great example of this), but I mean, I don't know what to tell you, other than bee the change I guess.
