>>126930914
>we are 3 people
lmao and you’re doing it again, you sure you’re not the baiter?
yes and you’re only one of these people, speak for yourself, you can stop speaking for other people.
>people have their own shit to deal with
bro are you retarded? this isn’t like a guitar center where you are paid employees and your time is so valuable you can only afford to talk to durr strangers on the internet for 30 min or less, this is hobbyist forum.
if you have shit to do, go do it. there’s no hurry? these threads stay up days. no one is obligated to any particular amount of time, great constructive criticism can be said in 45 seconds or less. or sure, someone could go above and beyond and spend an hour breaking down my track.
no one is complaining or feeling entitled to feedback. my only point is, we are all here to discuss and advise each others music, so for one stop acting like it’s a chore you queer, that’s what this thread exists for, and secondly if you are going to post some advice, or feedback, make it actually worthwhile instead of the dumbest shit possible.
criticizing the timing is valid, but it would be more helpful to explain if you think it’s off by alot or by a little, maybe point out what are the parts of the song where it’s the worst.
but regardless, i could hear someone with shitty timing attempt a song and still enjoy the particular chord progression, song structuring they used or melody they wrote and offer some feedback to the song outside the aspect of timing.
>you’re gonna think im saying it to be mean
no
again, you say its bad, which is fine, but we all understand the subjectivity of music taste. if you think it’s bad, you can still try and articulate why it’s bad. maybe the ostinato bass riff is too repetitive for your taste, not enough diatonic movement, maybe you don’t even like electronic dance music, that’s where knowing your background would give me a better idea where you’re coming from.
