Arguing about drivetrain layouts is always the telltale sign of a benchracer. Go back to playing gran turismo
>>28532085
I remember this one. It was even crazier when I learned that the Civic was only outputting 250hp from a B20 compared to that 86's 350hp with a 3SGTE.
>>28532020
I have never owned a fwd car but have worked on and driven a few enough to know they are total pieces of shit and anyone who thinks their fwd econobox is an enthusiast car is coping.
>>28533375
bmws 3 series and golfs are weeb cars
funny because the bmw faggot who keeps spamming, his cars are all loved by weeblets >>28533068 >incel
the only people who get consistent sex on this chart are the challenger and mustang owner
>>28533397
experienced p gnarly wheel hop once in the elantra N but turning traction control (ESC) totally off basically eliminated that and it can do 0-60 in 4.8 seconds which is about as fast as physically possible from a FWD car
>>28533397 >>28539223 >>28539241
Rear wheel drive wheel hop = as a result of worn suspensions and or bushings
Front wheel drive wheel hop = as a result of being a shit box from the factory
>>28546891
OP compares fwd to a dog with bad rear legs so anon compares rwd with a dog with bad front legs. While multiple drivetrains exist most people (not all) who pick fights with fwd are rwd fans so it's understandable why anon would make that assumption. His post was accusing OP of being a hypocrite.
>>28547785
But it's not a good comparison because the front wheels in a fwd car do the steering and acceleration. In a rwd car the front wheels steer and the rear wheels accelerate. The rear wheels in a fwd do nothing.
