Thread 4422539

We hope you enjoyed your involuntary hiatus. But you're here forever.

i'm here forever. i'd unironically be quite sad if 4chan went down for good

>>4422547
yeah that's dope

>>4422539 (OP)
> But you're here forever.
I don't mind at all

missed you guys

Got this at a recent airshow. Unsure if this image actually looks good or is just out of focus. Looking for some feedback.

>>4422606
It's hard to tell exactly. Looks like the 5 on the tail is in focus but at that distance plus the exhaust, your photo is bound to have some haze / atmospherics that would affect sharpness.

Where is the exif information?

went to a protest yesterday.
>>4422606
the exhaust is making part of it out of focus. other than that, it could be color graded a little bit.
>>4422603
missed u too corgi anon <3

Is there anything in this picture? I don't want to trash it but I don't feel like it is 'right' in the current form. Can't figure out a way to crop or edit it to have any impact.

>>4422622
what do you like or dislike about it?

>>4422623
I think it's too unfocused, too busy.

>>4422622
It's called a snapshit. Very normal, don't worry about it. Either delete it or keep it but either way just move on with your life.

>>4422606
Vidya vibes.

>>4422614
Did you see me?

>>4422642
i saw a few women taking pictures and a dude in all black. assuming that was you? i was wearing a black hoodie and had a red bag lol

I saw people with cameras.

>>4422647
pretty in a weird way

>>4422647
What camera, lenses? (Canon?)

airport scanner nuked cinestill 800t

I usually hate B&W but this one was kinda begging for it

>>4422614
Why not straighten this image?

I missed you /rpt/

>>4422657
dutch angel created chaos

i kinda missed it here
for a bit
then i went out again

>>4422739
cya

I guess this is where everyone went and they didn't even tell me :( anyway.
Shot this last night trying to test out a 3d printed Bahtinov mask.
>didn't quite fit
>probably the wrong grid ratio for the focal length I was using as well (didn't know that was a thing before)
>way too drunk to drive so had to find something in walking distance
>is a fucking light pole
>somehow forgot everything I used to think i knew about taking photos at night
>didn't bring a phone or torch so couldn't see the buttons or remember how to set self timer or mirror lock-up
Could have turned out worse, at least I left the house with a camera.

>>4422612
just noticed that lol. this is gonna be so much fun!

>>4422759
>nooo I need to see what camera this picture was taken on so I can decide if it's good or not
Good. The only people it hurts are beginners asking why their pictures aren't turning out right and they can always screenshot it if they want to share

>>4422760
I just want to know focal length, F number and shutter speed, knowing the type of lens and camera used is also nice

>>4422761
I agree but it is the source of a lot of brandfaggotry. I believe they used to not let you post until after you manually remove any location info from the exif ecause the monkeys coding this site obviously couldn't figure out how to automate removal even though they left the name section. They probably disabled exif now because they can't figure out if there's another exploit in there (there isn't but they are retarded) so I doubt we'll be seeing it again any time soon.

>>4422761
>>4422762
Sorry I sort of rambled on there and missed my own point. It would be good to see shot settings but leave out brand names. That will never happen though.

>>4422761
You can always just ask

Got to test the old nikkor 105mm out and it is nice but chunky.

Trying to take a bunch of photos of those religious statues around Japan.

>>4422753
I love the colors on this. Is this a long exposure?
>>4422735
I like agriculture photography and nothing can make me not.
>>4422647
This is so pleasing. Reminds me of my old roommate's work.

>>4422799
>Is this a long exposure?
Ty! yes it its.

>>4422791
Nice cat.

>>4422799
>I like agriculture photography and nothing can make me not.
cheers buddy, yeah, im with you on that one - i always loved the huge grain silos in the US, we dont really have those here, gotta make do with stuff like this

>>4422869
>sony colors

>>4422872
>grain

>>4422838
Thank you. He is one a few

>>4422883
>>4422886
>>4422895
I can't mass reply to all dog and cat pics posted because of spam filter. I wanted to say nice to them all.

>>4422894
Pet pics are simply the best. I keep a wired strobe kit in my house to quickly set up when I get bored and want to snap some pics. Even a single umbrella + strobe can lead to some nice results.

>>4422903
I have a speedlight that I want to get a trigger for or another one, as well as a stand and softbox. But I do my best work in natural light since I started off doing exclusively nature and sunrises

>>4422907
I use a novatron 1000 and usually just point it straight up at my white ceilings. It lets me shoot around f11-f16 and 100 iso. Perfect for erratic subjects.
It's a good place to start, but the lighting can get a bit boring. Definitely recommend learning strobes a bit. It's really fun and makes producing super sharp images so easy.
Pretty sunset btw. I actually like the saturated colors in that one.

>>4422913
there's a semi-cheap strobe I found on marketplace that I've had my eye on. but I also have my eye on a 70-200mm 2.8 lens lol
I usually don't up the saturation but that was so close to looking like a painting that I said what the hell, why not
also, been trying to get the lighting just right for a macro of a cat's eye is damn difficult for a beginner

>>4422919
>>4422917
Tough choice. Lens is probably more useful for you, but the strobe will make indoor shooting a lot easier.

I would suggest using a window with a translucent curtain in front for strong/soft light. If your camera supports high fps do the macro wiggle and hope you get a couple goods ones lol.

>>4422894
Charlie has iris melanosis.

>>4422921
the lens is cheaper than the strobe too lol plus I could use a non-macro 2.8 anyways.
good idea, both those were taken using on camera speedlight with manual focus at 1:1 which narrows the aperture to a 5.6 on my lens. I had to take a few shots to get them

>>4422540
this pisses me off. what is this a photo of anyways?

>>4422550
>>4422553
kinda cool actually. nice

>>4422564
hehe funny

>>4422622
i like it. i personally like how they look at the camera. the facial expressions are a little interesting too. s'nice

>>4422650
nice.

>>4422659
this one is nice

>>4422671
is this guys fetish mannequins? can anyone confirm this?

>>4422686
nice capture. neat atmoshpere

>>4422716
cool. nice

>>4422735
be-a-utiful colors here. lovely

>>4422738
holy shit, immediately saved. nice. peacful. nice

>>4422740
so dramatic, so nice. could you imagine if the logo centered on his head perfecly? the guy on the right kinda takes attention away but the dramatic shadow covering his eyes gives him aura so its okay

>>4422752
nice color

>>4422755
cool. >at least I left the house with a camera.
Yes.

>>4422869
wow. i like how the power lines look so tiny compared to this scene. very nice

>>4422922
He does but has not been an issue hes just old and deaf

>>4422943
what a pretty cat

>>4422927
nah, I just find mannequins interesting subjects for some reason.

It was horrible being without you guys.

60000 iso maxing

>>4422545
>>4422603
>>4422613
>>4422716
I like these a lot

>>4422549
made me smile. used to play this on easter

>>4422928
>could you imagine if the logo centered on his head perfecly?
thanks bud! yeah i tried to snap a couple more before the moment was gone but this one, even though it is slightly ocd-triggering, worked out the best

Here's a photo of a worm.

>>4422982
a selfie then

>>4422987
>>4422795
the vibes are on point


I will add one I took recently

>>4422999
So nice! The bw mood really matched the photo

>wake up
>/p/ only has 9 pages
>look at the catalog
>gear thread ausrottend
israel/india ip wipe? GOOD

[x] two building corners
[x] parked car
[x] black and white
[x] slightly wrong perspective
[x] bad light
[x] cropped a cropped crop for reach
i am become /p/

first post here, rate this pic

>>4423076
I give it a 7/11

>>4423077
cool

>>4422959
>>4422907
>>4422650
>>4422564
Nice
>>4422740
If this is candid, v v nice

Ty everyone for posting except the guy who keeps posting mannequins

Shit photo from my phone. Apparently clear blue skies are something entirely foreign to the Chinese people I've been talking to. That's one thing I always see brought up by them.

>>4423133
don't you know its my art when I post mannequins on a thai noodle boiling imageboard?

>>4423155
That's aesthetics.

I tried editing a raw phone shot. Did they kill exif embedding? Awful.

>>4422753
>>4422943
Good

>>4423076
If the truck was a little more in focus I'd love it. For now I like how the crosswalk lines blur.

>>4423133
>If this is candid, v v nice
thanks, yeah, get your friends a bit drunk and they will do all the poses on their own haha

>>4422973
I appreciate burger-core

Handheld, single shot macro of a firefly

>>4423226
not on fire or flying/10
nice pic

1000054012.jpg:
Nothing engaging about this photo-it looks really boring. There’s a big black sky with nothing in it, and nothing catches my eye in the composition. The composition is lackluster, and so is the editing; stylistically, it’s unappealing.

1000054712.jpg:
Nothing’s going on. What am I supposed to look at? Debris?

1000054700.jpg:
The framing is, again, not interesting. I also don’t get why you included those random objects hanging from the top. Also, the flour doesn’t stand out. You could have used a small light to make the flour pop, or drawn the lighting in Photoshop with a soft light layer.

1000054593.jpg:
Nothing interesting is going on. I assume the plant is the main subject, but its visual weight is weak, making the composition unbalanced and chaotic. Also, using this long focal length with the heavy blur to make the plant stand out more feels beginner-like.

1000053908.jpg:
The tunnel is cool. At least give a reward at the end-place yourself or a friend at the end of the tunnel. That would have made the composition feel somewhat nice. Also, I’m not a fan that you again used a lot of black around the frame. It’s like you can’t commit to the composition.

1000053857.jpg:
This time you actually have an engaging main subject-power lines, so that’s cool. But everything around it is boring. The shed to the left looks cluttered and boring. The mountains seem like they are just placed wherever; they’re not guiding the viewer through the composition.

DSC03702-3.jpg:
I guess this is an alright photo. You used high contrast with high clarity, which creates a highly stylistic look. However, the background blur is distracting, and the two dots on the right are also distracting. The photo lacks any kind of story-it’s just “here’s the animal’s head.” It doesn’t feel like you made this photo with intention or a specific mood you wanted to convey.

one day ill be able to hold the camera still

camera locked eye focus on this sculpt

Spring is here and i can finally test my homebrew aerochrome filter stack finally

>>4423229
Are you a bot that wasn't coded to understand how 4chan replies work?

>>4423197
This is a comedy photo and I can't be convinced otherwise. You're fucked in the head anon.

Asian Bleeding Heart
D750 & Tamron 90mm macro

had some fun with an off camera flash, gels, and some friends yesterday

>>4423294
this looks like ai

>>4423299
Or HEAVILY denoised

>>4423299
>>4423303
210mm @ f9, iso 100 & 1/30s you scrubs

>>4423303
>1500x1000
4chan comprsses the fuck out of images for no reason and the smaller your dimensions are the more detail is lost.

Photos here look better if you disrespect the server and upload a 4mb file that's around 4000 or 6000 pixels on the long side and zoom out (browser downscaling algorithms are pretty good)

>>4423283
NTA, but he is probably avoiding mass reply spam filters.

>>4423308
Exposure settings aren't really relevant, ty for proving who the real scrub is

>>4423308
>using scrub in 2025

>>4423343
fucking forgot I was still on 1/250 when I went outside for these shots

>>4423344
cute cat i suppose

>>4423344
And that shutter speed was bad because?

>>4423314
of course they are ya dingus, how do you think i can get noiseless image like that
>>4423326
no idea what this means but scrub has been around longer than your ability to hold a camera zoomer faggot

>>4423284
yeah the fact that the grandma is handicapped is a bit stupid lol

>>4423353
>how do you think i can get noiseless image like that
Because you could have an image with those same exposure settings with more apparent noise. Those exposure settings don't mean noiseless. ISO 100 doesn't mean no noise.
The reason it looks like ai or heavily denoised isn't because of your exposure settings. In fact, you could even have different exposure settings and still look just as ai like.

>>4423369
>ISO 100 doesn't mean no noise.
snoy or crop sensor? you be the judge

>>4423314
>exposure settings aren't relevant
most intellectual /p/ poster

>>4423376
Is the exposure setting the sole reason why it looks the way it does?

>>4423370
An understanding that noise comes from snr, not ISO

>>4422941
artistic

>>4422954
vibey

>>4422970
>>4422971
>>4422974
nice

>>4423076
better than zach atleast

>>4423093
>>4423095
nice

>>4423160
very interesting shot. nice

>>4423230
all are nice shots. top left and bottom right look cool.PLEASE PLEASE PLESSE PLESASE PLAASE PLEASE PLSAESA share the colored versions if you have them, please.

>>4423252
the poles stop this from being excellently beautiful rip

>>4423277
im not a fan of alternative colors at all but this is cool. nice shot

>>4423285
crisp shot

>>4423294
wow. this is a professional shot. are you a journalist? i only see shots of this level from big name news organizations.

>>4423310
almost nice but the composition is just off and I cant put my finger on it rip

>>4422539 (OP)
Gorgeous shot. Love the colors and the reflections. If only the water was a little calmer.

>>4423155
Feels very dark and dreary. I like it.

>>4423285
Beautiful, sharp shot.

>>4423294
The camel in the foreground really makes this shot.

Wish I had gotten the second jet less blurred.

>>4423350aybe not those two but I lost a bunch of good shots to motion blur lol

>>4423435
Dang cat must have been zooming to be blurry at that speed!

>>4423438
he waddles but he walks kind of fast and looks around a lot (that killed most of the photos was him moving his head when someone walked by or a car went past)
photo kind of related as the geese were eating and I was at 1/1250 to freeze any movement

>>4423439
wrong photo

>>4423391
>the poles stop this from being excellently beautiful rip
It's really a shame they put this sculpt on such a dumb place and what's even worse it collecting rain

>>4423229
How's This?

>>4423284
care to elaborate? is it just >>4423363 or am I missing your point entirely

Ever get caught off guard by someone striking a pose or otherwise mugging for your camera?

>>4423465
I bet she was really cute when she was in her prime

Male Rice Fly, my 2nd time doing macro with a live subject, single shot, handheld (one hand on flower to stop it from swaying)
1/125, ISO 100, f/16, 90mm macro lens

>>4423505
Dandelion, same settings

What did I do right and what did I do wrong

>>4423509

2/2

Frozen Fountain Square, Batumi, Adjara

>>4423533
Nice giant lipstick.

>>4423473
she still is cute

goodboi at the park

>>4423577
I think some clever cropping and rotation would help this photo a lot.

>>4422539 (OP)
you got more of this

>>4422606
Looks pretty in focus to me. The left wing is just hazy because of the exhaust. Try editing it. You're not going to be able to remove the haze on the left, but you can at least get better exposure

>>4423579
Too old

>>4423533
This could've been really cool without the walkway in the shot.

>>4430273
I powerfully disagree. The walkway makes it work.

What teh fuck is happening. There's like four active RPT threads.
Also, I miss EXIF

>>4422542
Pretty, pretty good