>>4433432
Character review.
(1,1) very smooth and creamy bokeh in the background, a but busy in the foreground. Likely achieves its bokeh with undercorrected spherical aberration.
This bokeh is very neutral and pleasant.
Color comes through nicely and and slightly warm. Fair contrast.
This is a lens with solid and manageable character. 7/10.
(1,2) much busier bokeh, soap bubble effect. Meanwhile, the foreground bokeh is much smoother. Likely overcorrects spherical aberration. Bokeh pushes color through, giving it almost a painterly effect.
This bokeh could be used to nice effect.
Colors render cool, but retain high contrast.
A lens with strong character that shines through. 8/10.
(2,1) Busy bokeh without anything special. Polygonal bokeh. Forground bokeh even more unpleasant than (1,1).
Bokeh is subpar, not pleasant.
Contrast is fair, neutral colors.
Poor character. 3/10.
(2,2) Another very painterly bokeh with swirling to boot. Foreground bokeh is quite pleasant, too.
Contrasty in in-focus areas, very sharp local contrast. Neutral or slightly warm colors.
(Is this the Voigtlander?)
I love painterly bokeh and local/micro contrast. 9/10.
(3,1) Fairly neutral bokeh but not particularly "creamy".
Nothing much to note here. It's the sort of bokeh I'd expect from a competent lens.
Neutral in most other regards, too. Unnotable.
This is the character of a competent lens. 6/10.
(3,2) Mildly painterly bokeh. Foreground bokeh borders unpleasant.
Contrasty rendering. Colors push through in odd ways.
I don't know what to think of this lens. I could enjoy it. 7/10
(4,1) That bokeh is horrendous. They didn't consider it at all in the design. Both background and foreground bokeh are bad.
Colors push through however they want. Contrasty but not in a cohesive way.
I don't like it. 4/10.
(4,2) Another lens with neutral bokeh.
Contrasty, with good local contrast. Colors warm.
Competent character. 6/10.
