>>4436348
>people will say the bottom right is just a glitch
>but when every photo from cameras that do this on the dpreview test do it in real shots, it's not a glitch
>they are just in denial
Honestly it's very very bad. Very bad.
So bad, it's very bad. Like very bad. Much so.
You have to realize that cameras don't even capture color. When you see color, it's post-processed. The fact that all the other cameras capture data that can be post-processed well enough to give okay looking colors but these types can't is a very telling sign that SOMETHING IS FUCKED at the sensor level.
This is a common thing for 4turds cameras and a bunch of newer budget CMOS sensors.
DP Review's studio comparison always has the color checker in the scene and anyone can download the RAWs for themselves and use that on the RAW capture to try and fix the colors.
When you try correcting colors with sensors that do this shit, you'll see the deltas are way into the crazy territory (sometimes even fucking 8+, when ~1 is "ideal" and ~3 is "good").
Not all 4turds suffer from this greenwashing.
Most cameras overall haven't.
It's kind of a new phenomenon, and typically affects newer high megapixel sensors because they don't separate colors well enough either from weak filters or just too high of a noise floor compared to older equipment.
Even Fuji's bayer GFX 100 is objectively bad at color separation. With good exposure it gives a clean enough image to be corrected, but it's actual RAW unprofiled uncorrected bayer capture is basically as colorblind as 4turds shit.
BUYER BEWARE
If you don't like green tints, you should see if there are any signs of one showing up for the camera on DPreview. It's not fool proof, but it does expose the obviously bad offenders quite well.
