>yes all the same (Aperture priority mode = ISO 100, Aperture f/5, Shutterspeed variable due to CPL filter being stopping down so without filter 1/500, with filter 1/250) >no post processing (unless you mean canons internal processing based on the sensor they used blablbal I know people will argue that all cameras process but this is SOOC) >focus point the same
>>4439542
The industry standard for car photography is a 24-70, though most people also have some short telephotos too. Generally when you're shooting products you don't want the distance distortion that comes with wide angles. Even at 24mm, the banding in the sky is manageable.
>>4439582 >Is there any point in getting the cheapo $10-20 CPLs?
Yeah. As long as you're shooting raws you can just apply a preset to fix the uneven polarization issues. If your lens is under like $1500 new it's going to have more aberrations in the lens itself, but most lightroom programs automatically fix that for you. Just buy cheap filters unless you're using a lens so perfect that you need a high quality filter for it
>>4439619
yeah but if I just get an 82mm filter it will work on all my lenses and be very convenient.
There are plenty of 3D files for step up/down rings available, the only adjustment needed is shrinkage calibration.
