← Home ← Back to /p/

Thread 4440271

15 posts 2 images /p/
Anonymous No.4440271 >>4440273 >>4440277 >>4440309 >>4440321
all my sisters teenage friends are buying old digital cameras to imitate the 2000s aesthetic in their photos
Anonymous No.4440273
>>4440271 (OP)
Are they cute?
Anonymous No.4440277 >>4440308 >>4440320
>>4440271 (OP)
Meanwhile you can achieve that look with any modern camera with the possibility to adapt vintage lenses for "enhanced" user experience.
Spending on film nowadays is arbitrary and a complete waste of money.
Anonymous No.4440279
test
Anonymous No.4440280 >>4440284
I am going to get the highest resolution I can afford just to fuck zoomies
Fuck them and their fake nostalgia bullshit
Anonymous No.4440284
>>4440280
theyre all living in their own world
anyone older than them doesnt exist to them
Jesus No.4440308 >>4440315 >>4440316
>>4440277
>Spending on film nowadays is arbitrary and a complete waste of money.

If you don't get why it is that people still shoot film, you probably never will.
Anonymous No.4440309
>>4440271 (OP)
So? I often lend digicams to my female friends. Let them have fun I say.
Anonymous No.4440315
>>4440308
Anything film does, digital can do.
Manual focus, full-control, 36 exposures mindset, adapted vintage lenses, vintage post-editing, preset jpegs, etc.
Except loading and unloading film which is a pain in the ass and expensive.
Also prone to light leaks. Kek, losing your photos to the sunlight.
Anonymous No.4440316 >>4440318 >>4440325
>>4440308
OK why do you shoot film?
>dude...the vibes...the nostalgic longing for yestertomorrow dude....check my tiktok for more
OK you shoot film because you're a faggot
Jesus No.4440318
>>4440316

You have things (and me) all wrong here.
Anonymous No.4440320
>>4440277
>spending on film
hey esl, we're talking about digital cameras here
Anonymous No.4440321
>>4440271 (OP)

Blame modern camera makers, they are the ones failing to market to the younger generation of which none are going to want giant bulky pain in the arse to use $3000 bricks that take 100 megabyte photos which can’t even be used without running into Lightroom and spending 10 minutes fucking around and then having to save to a file size of 1mb to actually put online.
It’s no surprise they want a tiny $100 camera that takes good enough instantly usable photos and actually does fit in your pocket and is decently strong it won’t break if you drop it.
Actually thinking of picking one up myself to be honest, functional aesthetic cheap does the job.
Anonymous No.4440325
>>4440316
Only women and homosexuals shoot film for that reason. I hold no silly notions about film being better or anything like that, I just like collecting and using mechanical cameras. And they only use film, therefore. Luv me griii, luv me rf mount, luv me film, simple as.
Anonymous No.4440341
invite them to dehli i welcome them my friend