>>4440271 (OP) Meanwhile you can achieve that look with any modern camera with the possibility to adapt vintage lenses for "enhanced" user experience. Spending on film nowadays is arbitrary and a complete waste of money.
>>4440271 (OP) So? I often lend digicams to my female friends. Let them have fun I say.
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 1:49:57 PM No.4440315
>>4440308 Anything film does, digital can do. Manual focus, full-control, 36 exposures mindset, adapted vintage lenses, vintage post-editing, preset jpegs, etc. Except loading and unloading film which is a pain in the ass and expensive. Also prone to light leaks. Kek, losing your photos to the sunlight.
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 1:51:37 PM No.4440316
>>4440308 OK why do you shoot film? >dude...the vibes...the nostalgic longing for yestertomorrow dude....check my tiktok for more OK you shoot film because you're a faggot
Blame modern camera makers, they are the ones failing to market to the younger generation of which none are going to want giant bulky pain in the arse to use $3000 bricks that take 100 megabyte photos which can’t even be used without running into Lightroom and spending 10 minutes fucking around and then having to save to a file size of 1mb to actually put online. It’s no surprise they want a tiny $100 camera that takes good enough instantly usable photos and actually does fit in your pocket and is decently strong it won’t break if you drop it. Actually thinking of picking one up myself to be honest, functional aesthetic cheap does the job.
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 2:15:31 PM No.4440325
>>4440316 Only women and homosexuals shoot film for that reason. I hold no silly notions about film being better or anything like that, I just like collecting and using mechanical cameras. And they only use film, therefore. Luv me griii, luv me rf mount, luv me film, simple as.