Do I need full frame or APSC if I'm just doing hobby photography for myself and not for LE CLIENTS bullshit?

>>4441308 (OP)
Sure.

>>4441308 (OP)
Everything about your post screams Just use your phone, tbqhwy

>>4441308 (OP)
either is ok. FF is better in low light

>>4441308 (OP)
FF better by aps-c good enough for most, and in some cases good enough for pro work too
FF is so cheap now, no reason not to

>>4441320
>ff
>cheap
Not here in Australia
Just pay 1.5k for an a7ii without a lens bro
Then pay another one or two k for lenses

"need" is a stupid term for this purpose
you don't "need" a camera for hobby photography
but full frame is objectively better since you can use aps-c lenses on full frame too so you have more options

>>4441308 (OP)
If you’re not going straight for FF mirrorless or bigger why waste your money

>>4441308 (OP)
>Do I need full frame or APSC for hobby photography?
True answer: get one of each.
I have a Sony a7ii (full frame) and a Pentax K10D (APS-C). Get one kind or the other to begin with and then get the other kind down the road.