← Home ← Back to /p/

Thread 4441308

9 posts 4 images /p/
Anonymous No.4441308 [Report] >>4441310 >>4441314 >>4441315 >>4441320 >>4441324 >>4441337
Do I need full frame or APSC if I'm just doing hobby photography for myself and not for LE CLIENTS bullshit?
Anonymous No.4441310 [Report]
>>4441308 (OP)
Sure.
Anonymous No.4441314 [Report]
>>4441308 (OP)
Everything about your post screams Just use your phone, tbqhwy
Anonymous No.4441315 [Report]
>>4441308 (OP)
either is ok. FF is better in low light
Anonymous No.4441320 [Report] >>4441321
>>4441308 (OP)
FF better by aps-c good enough for most, and in some cases good enough for pro work too
FF is so cheap now, no reason not to
Anonymous No.4441321 [Report]
>>4441320
>ff
>cheap
Not here in Australia
Just pay 1.5k for an a7ii without a lens bro
Then pay another one or two k for lenses
Anonymous No.4441322 [Report]
"need" is a stupid term for this purpose
you don't "need" a camera for hobby photography
but full frame is objectively better since you can use aps-c lenses on full frame too so you have more options
Anonymous No.4441324 [Report]
>>4441308 (OP)
If you’re not going straight for FF mirrorless or bigger why waste your money
Anonymous No.4441337 [Report]
>>4441308 (OP)
>Do I need full frame or APSC for hobby photography?
True answer: get one of each.
I have a Sony a7ii (full frame) and a Pentax K10D (APS-C). Get one kind or the other to begin with and then get the other kind down the road.