Any time someone posts about m43 bad or snoy colors I know I can safely ignore them. No clue if they're right or wrong (I only shoot film) but the fact that someone wants to come here to shitfling about brands instead of discussing anything related to the work product tells me everything I need to know about their pea-sized brain.
>>4449036 (OP) >in every other art form, "low quality" means the art itself is shitty >in photography it refers to resolution, noise, and other irrelevant shit
gearfag: the hobby
>>4449160
yes, "sovl" and "magic" fucks literally credit photography to the camera
it passes because digital made it true. digital is fucking shit. film on the other hand is basically like shooting a fuji gfx100s with a fresh sensor every day.
>>4449391
Both of them look beyond terrible. M43 cameras should just cram a sim card in their and let you make calls with them. It would be such a huge improvement.
>>4449408 >i missed focus
did you? The softness is probably diffraction because nothing is sharp anywhere. I assume you shot at f/gorillion to get a lower shutter speed. Try an ND filter or shoot in the evening next time.
>>4459164
Nothing else I took is worth posting, so have a photo of a dog that was on the camera when I got it. Either this digicam can't timestamp photos or the software it came with just ignores them and sets the date/time to when you download the photo. This picture could have been on there for decades.
