>just shoot jpeg
>less time wasted infront of a computer and more time actually taking photos and being in the moment
It's that simple.

>>4452088 (OP)
she was always kinda piggy looking but holy fuckin grim

>>4452092
>she
HE WILL NEVER BE A WOMAN

>consoom for your photos to be less than stellar! consoom the specific soon to be $1000 ewaste camera! just so your photos can be only slightly worse than a $50 canon rebel+capture one!
Shooting jpeg is bugman behavior.

>>4452100
Some of them are already $1000. Just to avoid 20 min/week of editing throw "NO THATS PIXEL PEEPING! BAD!" copes directed at anyone with more than 1080p and a non-phone screen pointing out the smeary detail and color fog

>>4452100
>You have to hurry home and spend 5 hours editing atrocious snoy RAW files in front of your computer after every photo you take because... you just have to okay! Also im white and have an IQ of 150!!

>>4452088 (OP)
Yeah, it depends on the camera.
I tried using a profile on my Canon for a cinematic street photoshoot and the result was crap. Luckily I also shoot raw.

>>4452102
hyperbole is an admission of defeat.

>>4452101
pixel peeping is look at 1:1 view

>>4452088 (OP)
Recently i've began to realize this.
Almost all cameras today have jpg settings in the cameras also highlight, shadow, contrast, saturation settings.
Most shots i take don't need that extra 10% detail of DNG, carefully adjusting each components 1 to 50 level with viewed on my color graded 4k monitor.
>t. snapshitter.

>>4452137
Still i use capture one for landscapes and some photos to edit detail and color.

>>4452088 (OP)
>Just take shitty pictures.
>It's that simple.

>>4452088 (OP)
That's what your fukken sellphone is for you tard. They even make crappy fx to make your shitty jpgs look even shittier so you can pretend to be "authentic" like some sad bastard who has no place in this world.

>>4452119
1:1 view is basically just full screen on a first world computer.

>>4452119
Pixel peeping is more than 1:1

1:1 is just enjoying the whole photo.

>>4452163
>Just take shitty pictures and waste more hours editing them infront of a computer
ah, much better

>>4452186
>>4452118

>>4452088 (OP)

imagine small jpeg normal 5200Kelvin 1/100s f8 ISO100 28mm rangefocus taped to 3meters all day long

>>4452198
thanks for confirming jpeg is actually the end stage of gearfag cancer

i shoot raw so when i think of camera settings its like, "put it on A and toggle that thingy". i save my brain cells for the image, and looking at womens asses.

>Gearfags: raw makes every camera basically the same. how will people truly know what i used is an essential part of my identity?
>non gearfags: i found a free fuji lightroom preset pack
>gearfags: *hysterical hyperbole and being angry at sony*

>>4452095
She's a cis girl, strong like an ox, built like the ones in the Middle Ages.

>>4452455
if this is what cis women look like nowadays in America I understand why everyone is gay there

>>4452456
She's English.

>>4452457
It really does make you understand why they're all nonces when you see what their grown women look like

It's literally that simple

>>4452541
you can literally just make your own preset for raws and it's as fast as using jpegs but looks better and has more dynamic range

>>4452543
and you can always go back and adjust as taste and skillset changes

>>4452541
Shooting jpeg is a world of bullshit
>need to buy specific bodies for their SOOC jpeg rendering. Some suck at high ISOs, some don't, some smear more, some smear less, some have the good settings, some don't. This is why certain cameras have inflated in value from $50 to $500. Zoomers can't use computers and MUST shoot jpeg, and if they want ISO 3200 to not have colored dots all over they MUST buy a certain camera.
>need to fiddle with settings before taking a picture or accept camera-generated fuckups. white balance, "dynamic range optimizer/active d-lighting hdr###", color profile, etc.
>can never fix anything in post. must be on top of camera settings at all times.
>shoot more worthless photos, delete more worthless photos, all of a sudden the jpegger yearns for film
>lens magic is real again because camera lens correction support isn't always there or good, and lenses effect on color and detail is magnified by camera jpeg and minimized by typical raw processor defaults
Basically it turns photography into a gear-centric activity which is great if your real hobby is using a camera and looking like a photographer

With raw every camera is the same
>doesn't matter if it's a sony a6000 or a canon r6ii everything looks fine
>Don't overexpose, otherwise who cares
>white balance? lol
>no idea what half these settings do don't care
>click auto and spend 30 seconds moving stuff
>editing 500 photos would take forever, so shoot it like it's film

>>4452545
>editing 500 photos would take forever
nah you just go full rajeesh mode and use the AI integration to learn how you like photos edited and then let it grokify your raws

>>4452088 (OP)
I have a workflow that works for my camera, so I have no reason to shoot jpeg. You're kind of shooting yourself in the leg by refusing to learn how to edit. By shooting jpeg you're losing image quality and you're taking photos that you won't be able to adjust later should you learn how to edit. It also fucks you if your camera gets the WB wrong.

>>4452550
>I have a workflow that works for my camera, so I have no reason to shoot jpeg
the thing is, that workflow can easily be transferred to a different camera since there's not a big difference in raw processing despite what schizos here will screech
shooting raw is just more practical, if you care about space you can just shoot compressed raw

>>4452088 (OP)
why the fuck would I waste my time on JPEGs

>>4452088 (OP)
"Developing" the photo is half the fun. Its part of the process. If you are just letting the camera decide every aspect of the photo just use your phone.

>>4452564
Within a decade your phone will have AI connection that looks around and tells you where to put your phone to frame and composit your photo and then it will take a photo and 3d scan and use them to AI generate an infinite resolution replica of the photo designed to be maximally aesthetically pleasing, better than anything a human could ever produce
just cope and rope

>>4452566
you can ask AI today to make cartoons and paintings, but people still draw and paint. id be worried if i were a professional doing this but as a hobbyist, who cares? if you dont want to use skynet to take pictures then dont do it.

>boomer millennials cant go a few hours without sitting infront of a computer

>>4452593
editing 50 photos (1-2 weeks of snapshits) takes 15 minutes
maybe 20-25 minutes if you have a lot of fuck ups/moire

learn to use a camera instead of spraying and praying

>>4452593
Do you have anything better than just hyperbolic mumbling directed at no one?

>>4452601
25 minutes of an actual task (ie: not social media) feels like 25 hours to the zoomers maldeveloped adhd digital dementia brain

>>4452566
How will it know? What data will it learn this godly aesthetic from?

>>4452604
Neuroaesthetics research

>>4452564
it's not knowing what you're doing, le fix it in post. Get better

>>4452652
The last thing I want to do is "know what I'm doing" with digital cameras jpeg settings. What a fucking waste of time.

You go ahead and toggle white balances, DROs, and stay on top of exposure while the world passes you by. I'll sit comfy with exp. comp -1 and not give a fuck. Which is basically what shooting film is like (but negative film is +1)

>>4452652
>I'm so skilled, I double check my white balance like ken rockwell said
you are also limited to a selection of overpriced meme cameras for their jpeg output

with raw, every camera has the same image quality and "color science". stop being a soulless techie bugman and learn to do things that actually matter.

>>4452658
BS, RAW fixes a lot but CFAs remain different.
Agreed that JPEG output is a bad criteria for cam picking.

>>4452665
If you actually knew more than brand wars you'd know most alleged CFA differences are actually lens coating differences and even those more dramatic changes calibrate out

>>4452656
use auto white balance, and ofc check that your exposure is ok before you burst
>>4452658
I don't use meme cameras,, I use previous generation or the cheapest new ones, True satisfaction comes from being able to know what the image is going to look like before pressing the shutter