>/p/ says sony bad
>Buy sony
>It's actually good

>>4452210 (OP)
You think if they knew what they were talking about they’d be seething about the #1 FF camera brand on 4chan?

>>4452210 (OP)
Buy an ad.

>>4452210 (OP)
Because they don't know how to edit.

>>4452210 (OP)
4chan kinda does that with everything. Go to any board and there will be some gay endless war about brands of literally anything.

>>4452210 (OP)
People only "hate" brands when either they can't afford them but want to, or they think it's an alternative to having a personality.

>>4452210 (OP)
>>4450591

>>4452210 (OP)

>>4452237
>that one picture from the biased reviewer
The fact that there are no other examples from anyone else speaks volumes.

Sony looking pretty alright imo.

Close down /p/, nophoto, gear masturbation, gaslighting garbage board

>>4452247
the removal of exifs has made it better, nobody can gearfag in /rpt/ anymore

>>4452243
This. Honestly Canon Users BTFO'd Again. This Is From The Same Article. They Will Never Achieve These Natural Greens Found In White People's Skin. I Hope One Day I'll Be Able To Meet A Real White Person.

>>4452240
This is taken from a video about trying to make Sony video output match Canon's, it's not comparing two unedited samples. It's a good video, you should watch it, you might learn something.

>>4452255
Explain the above then, unedited.

>2025
>falling for the snoy meme

>>4452253
>>4452256
You mean this? The sony makes the her skin look green (which is not the colour skin is supposed to be) whereas the canon doesn't. Hope this helps!

>>4452253
>He cited this article as evidence of le superior sony skintones
Holy fucking kek they really are indians aren't they

>>4452259
ohnonononono sony shills??

>>4452262
Is it over for us, snoysisters?