Thread 4452278

Can someone explain to me how to make a photo with effects like this? I don’t know what to do but I love pics that look like this

Slow shutter speed and intentional camera movement are what you need to do during the exposure, then you would need to adjust the colours in post-processing to your liking by hue-shifting, split toning or some other process (not by messing with white balance).

Defocussing on a soft lens would probably help the end product look more blurry, too.

>>4452278 (OP)
Second curtain

>>4452285
>>4452287
>>4452292

Anything to do with just an IPhone since I don’t have camera with me atm?

>>4452294
Phones are trash. Buy a proper camera. Could be a 10 years dslr.

But look for some iphone app which gives you manual controls. And then practice slow shutter setting with someone.

>>4452331
*10 years old dslr

you can even use a 15 or 20 years old dslr to learn the basic

>>4452331
>>4452333
I have $30,000 worth of cameras I just don't have any on me rn

>>4452335
Epic trolololololo XD

>>4452278 (OP)
You are a photographer and understand the basic concepts of it.
How can you possibly not now or have a hunch on how to achieve that effect?

>>4452337
I just set the dial to the green square and shoot pictures idk my fujis just work

>>4452339
I have to give advice based on judgments. So it seems the subject is not moving horizontally so it implies on-camera motion with slow shutter speeds.
It looks like a stage, so I doubt they would allow the phootgrapher to position a flash close to him, so we discard the 2nd curtain option.
Finally, it seems like his expressions are to clear for that kind of effect and they change quite drastically. Wo my vote is for a photoshop of about 2-3 photos with the white balance all the way down to the left.
Again, this is a judgement based on a single photo and that's how I would "replicate" it if I wanted to.

>>4452278 (OP)
Long exposure panning from left to right with three bursts of a flash

>>4452294
No he's retarded you actually need a camera for this because cameras have a real shutter and phones are actually just taking a video feed and using the few seconds before you hit the button to composite a photo

What this fucker did is he used a flash and fired it 3 times in multi mode while moving the camera with the shutter stuck open, and then he closed the shutter. This is simple shit but phones can't do it.

>>4452381
>What this fucker did is he used a flash and fired it 3 times
Not unless he had an off camera flash above and to the front (where the stage light would be) but you're closer than any other retard itt. That is how you would go about replicating this but I highly doubt it's what happened. They probably had a flashing light above the stage and a long exposure just caught it right. There's no way in hell that he just held a long exposure and paused in 3 spots as >>4452285 suggested.

>>4452278 (OP)
If you wanted to do this in the real-world, she would flash you or you would flash her 3 times while your shutter was open and moving.
The blurry bits come from movement.
The "sharp" "burned in images" inside the blur are from separate flash triggers.

>>4456330
the flashes come from stage lighting dumdum

>>4452278 (OP)
My guess is moving the camera more than than range ibis can do during exposure and is keeps trying and failing.

(Entry level compact, tried walking forward during 1s exposure to see what it would look.)

>>4452278 (OP)
>>4452381
>>4452581
yes you absolutely can do it handheld, long exposure pausing in 3 spots. git gud

in lens image stabilisation, quick flashing stage light programming and static performer help a lot