>>4463731
Very unique feel to these anon. Especially the portraits. The portraits are your strongest ones here but the pictures of trash/objects were a little under composed. I feel like that would be the best thing to improve on. Very good photo set though. You really captured a unique sense of place.
>>4463733
Thanks >>4463773
Cool! Thanks for the feedback. It was mostly run and gun type of photography, no time to do proper composition. >>4463926
Yeah lucky accident >>4463938
120mm film
>>4463834
It means it's lacking in the intent department, that the arrangement/framing doesn't reveal much artistic thought. I don't necessarily agree or disagree with the critique (didn't see the pics) just explaining what it means.
OP you do have documentary photography chops I must say that. I have no interest in documentary therefor I can not say much.
You should try to make your photos more crisp and more consistent by deeply studying Walker Evans, August Sander and Eugene Atget. If you will improve your skills then you might get a shot at having a proper photography "career" by doing assignments and shit. Because academics, editors and journalists like this type of photography. You can also present yourself as a turd worlder poor fag to get diversity quotas in US and Europe. Good luck OP.
>>4466765
yeah i messed with it on my phone
i dont like because there is to much space near the top which makes the framing look weird
other than that the majority of these are solid as fuck you got some skills OP
