Thread 4464533

>some of the greatest photographs of human history were, on a technical level, blurry, grainy pieces of shit
Tell me again why you need edge-to-edge sharpness, 100 megapixels, and the ability to shoot at 124,000ISO?

>>4464533 (OP)
>confusing need with want
What a shit thread.
OP is a fag.

>>4464533 (OP)

If you don't have an eye and a vision for it, what's the next easiest thing to focus on in photography? There you go. Besides, this "sharpness" hard-on reminds me of people whose rooms are full of white Ikea furniture - looks worse than a hospital.

>>4464533 (OP)
>Tell me again why you need edge-to-edge sharpness, 100 megapixels, and the ability to shoot at 124,000ISO?
Because it is fun.

>>4464533 (OP)
You always use the best tool available for the job. Today, that photo would have been taken with a FF flagship or better.

>>4464533 (OP)
Need is a spook

Mind your own business, you controlling narcissistic demon. Let god sort these things out.

>>4464622
>actually good things are for bad people
The world’s oldest cope

Have you realized yet? Your envy makes you the most vile person in the room. And no masterpieces from you either. Just vitriol.

>>4464626
his real masterpiece is how much he hates other people.

>>4464626

I spend 10k on body so I am a good photographer tralala. Boring dentists

>>4464629
Yes. Let the darkness consume you. Assume more! Hate harder!

>>4464630

What's there to assume? You're just physically unable to say "I have it because I can afford it and not because I need it". Honesty is anatema to the poseur.

>>4464632
Why do you care? You just want power over others. Even now, you beg them to say what you want them to. You want to be the most important and glorious. And surely you will now call yourself sensible and honest?

So you’ve become the least. Degraded to whining about people owning cameras on 4chan.

Because it looks better and gives us the ability to destructively edit it if we want to.

Next.

>>4464533 (OP)
ideologies based on being mad about other people owning things the ideologue didnt think they needed have killed the second largest number of people in history, right after islam, and in a shorter time period.

one day you’re chet but before you know it you’re being beheaded by shigalov.

the message is the medium

>>4464533 (OP)
Overly sharp portraits are ugly.

>>4464659
Clarity -20 structure -10, radius 0.5 amount 120 threshold 0 don't use a gmaster lense you're welcome
>i dont know what this means!
Skill issue.

>>4464660
>still looks like absolute shit

Kek

>>4464660
Thanks this looks great

>>4464661
Maybe its you not the settings bb

>>4464664
>>4464660
>Powerful samefag cope.

Kek again

>>4464664
>>4464660
Wait before you fake the screenshot of you not samefagging you should post some pictures with your little cope settings.

This is a bot thread and no matter what opinion you post (agree or disagree with OP) a bot will begin arguing with you.

>But why?
This is intended to make you hate your hobby and waste time arguing about pointless nonsense with fake people on the internet instead of actually living your life and enjoying things.

>>4464673
>>4464667
thats a lot of seethe for a bad photographer. post the photo that didnt work out so we can tell you how to get better :)

>>4464632
This might be the post pathetic post on /p/ right now.

>you dont need expensive gear to take a picture like this!!!

picture was taken with a leica btw

>>4464680
>nophoto projects again

Your assumptions make you look hilariously retarded, samefag. Thank you for the laughs.

>>4464684
Did you expect better from the seething samefag?

>>4464688
oh so you dont have any portraits to edit?

>>4464690
I posted that overly sharp portraits look like shit, which is a fact that upsets many tasteless autists.
You incorrectly and hilariously assumed that I take overly sharp portraits because you are having a little melty in your cope thread.

Now post some of your portraits.(You wont)

>self appointed photography expert has no photography to post, can't demonstrate shit, "no U post a photo"
see anon if you just bought a sony you could be having fun right now

>>4464632
lol @ this impotent rage

>samefag meltdown

Continues

>>4464679
This actually makes perfect sense. Pretty shitty one too. Or maybe it is purposefully being extra retarded. We will never know. Either way it is pretty funny.

>>4464700
I can't see the humor after seeing how this exact shit has made things unbearable throughout the site. It means that even this slow board might be a target now. We've already had a noticable uptick in autistic rageposting in the last few months or so.

>>4464716
I like to imagine the secret king that thinks he's doing something by using a bot.
Post photos, talk about photos posted and ignore the obvious botting. It's really the only way.

>look at shitty photo why you need camera?
>look at shitty painting why you need camera?
>look at shitty mural why you need camera?
>unga bunga look stick draw stand

>>4464533 (OP)
>some of the best photographs in history were on film
wow it's almost like film existed before digital

>>4464533 (OP)
>Tell me again why you need edge-to-edge sharpness, 100 megapixels, and the ability to shoot at 124,000ISO?
Because i need a crop of a corner at night like your pic related

>>4464679
It’s the deep state trying to prevent you from enjoying your photography hobby anon

>No other portraits posted
>Just another argument thread
Faggots.

>>4464533 (OP)
There is a difference between highest-circulation of reference photos of historical figures, and optimal portraits. Certain photos carry memetic value and get spread more than others, despite being technically inferior

>>4464533 (OP)
tech specs are the refuge of the autistic mind. real photographers just go out and shoot. autistic gear enthusiast go online and post in forums.